I have now done another test at
smgf.org -- this time using 11 markers (or
twelve -- one of them seems to have two parts) -- and I got the result:
8/11.
That probably involves too long a time to the most recent common ancestor
for the similarity in surname to be anything more than a coincidence. My
family did not start using surnames (I think) until the 17th century A.D..
Peter Zohrab
How the Government Creates Child Abuse
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?print=yes&id=13996 Feminist Mob
Rule at University
http://equality.netfirms.com/univmobs.html Joint Custody
Annotated Research Bibliography
http://nzmera.orcon.net.nz/custbibl.html The
Next President's a Batterer
http://nzmera.orcon.net.nz/hillaryc.html US Men’s
Group Launches Suit
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/mar/06031010.html
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Zohrab" <peter(a)zohrab.name>
To: <ZARUBA-L(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 4:43 AM
Subject: [ZARUBA] Zaruba = Zorab/Zohrab ?
Hello,
I did a search at
http://smgf.org/ using "Zorab" and my Genographic
ancestral genetic test results and got the result:
http://smgf.org/ysearch_results.jspx?markerOrder=smgf&labStandard=Gen...
which might indicate that Zaruba is the Czech & Hungarian version of
Zohrab/Zorab. It is certainly worth looking into, anyway.
See my family history page at:
http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/zohrab1/
Peter Zohrab