Well......
There could be the review system done with no area for comment....other
than just listing the problems....like broken links...things of that nature.
The only thing about the comments, is that for me anyway, I've always made
a *suggestion* about something that could be done maybe a little bit
easier, or cleaner (w/o using that word) for the site to present
something. I do say that flashing "new" signs, or the sort are
distracting....and they are.....especially for me with the visual handicap.
It needs to be remembered that a LOT of researchers are of the gray hair
community! Visual acuity for them is very important.
Mari
At 12:40 PM 4/29/2004,Jan Cortez wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mari" <ddmmjm(a)netins.net>
> (sigh) I don't know what to say....but still am steadfast in that I don't
> see another way of being sure that the sites are all providing the same
> level of quality for the researchers. That's ALL I'm interested in.
*********************************************
Mari, it isn't your fault and we know that, and I agree that is what we are
all interested in.
Maybe, if a check list were set up, kind of like they do in TX with the
surfing committee, it would be a case of no direct comments, but will tell
if links are all good, logos are there, updates are regular, etc.
In fact, maybe a surfing committee would be a good thing for WI. Provide
winning monthly logos for the top site and runners up. Might give some an
incentive to build a better site.
Just my two cents worth.
Jan
==== WIGEN Mailing List ====
Celebrate Wisconsin!
Visit the Taylor County WIGenWeb Project Pages
http://www.rootsweb.com/~witaylor/