Ellen,
Perhaps Tim is not trying to be misleading in any way. Perhaps he
is stating it as he receives or understands it. I am well aware how
moderation works and I also know despite what the rootsweb site may say, if
someone complains about being moderated, rootsweb will e-mail the list
maintenance person and ask what the problem is. As I stated before, it has
to be a threat or swearing. Maybe perhaps even if a person verbally attacks
one person with unrealistic comments that would offend. However, Tina
stated the person Tim referred to was not subbed to the list, there fore I
believe it was not his intention to hurt the feelings of this person or to
belittle them.
I perceived Tina's letter as a note from mother telling her
children they really did something wrong. I think there would have really
been no reason to post to the mailing list that they are being moderated
for any reason. That should have been sent private to them as it doesn't
interfere with any of the other members to the list if they are moderated,
other then to say there is no real freedom of speech here then.
As to offense about a comment, you have every right to state your
discontent to the statement, just as much right as Tim has to make the
statement, that is what Freedom of speech is all about. You do not know if
he was purposely trying to mislead, or was stating his opinion as he
perceives it. Right or wrong, he should have the right. Ellen, how would
you feel if you were moderated because you didn't like someone's opinion?
There really is no difference in what happened here, not in my opinion.
What if Tina would add you to the moderation list because of your opinion
written to me?
I see no reason to argue about this, as it stated before, I had a
few questions, I need to know what comments will be moderated for everyone
or if it is just certain people. I also stated my opinion, which in theory
I should have the right to do, no matter if everyone agrees or nobody
agrees with me at all.
I just don't think it was handled incorrectly in any instance and
since she is a leader, I feel Tina should have handled this with more tact
and respect. The only thing I see here is Tina is letting everyone know
that if she doesn't like it, she has all the control over you. Perhaps if
she would have e-mailed Tim and Jan privately and asked them about these
comments, maybe they would have found the content was misleading. It has
happened to people before, a few words were placed in the wrong order or
are missing and the letter that was meant to be a general non-argumentative
letter, has turned into something else. I am curious if she just added them
to the list of needing her consent to e-mail for a week or if she did
contact them privately to attempt to set this straight? Actually I don't
even need to know if this was done in private as to the attempt, but I do
feel the need to know what guidelines she is going to use or are already
using to decide who will be moderated and why. I would like to make sure I
am not moderated for just writing my opinion and not intending to hurt anyone.
Debie Blindauer
Calumet & Sheboygan Counties
At 12:38 AM 7/31/2003 -0500, you wrote:
I agree that it is nice to be informed, however when the information
comes
with negative tones and sometimes is not factual it causes discontent
among the members. Especially when the leadership of the organization is
presenting the informaton.
As elected members of the advisory board, Jan and Tim have accepted the
responsibility to serve as a good example of the guidelines and standards
of The USGenWeb Project.
Debie, as list administrator, Tina does have the right to monitor all
posts and determines the guidelines for the list. She also has the right
to intervene to resolve problems or disputes that are detrimental to the
list. (
http://helpdesk.rootsweb.com/listadmins/duties.html) If she feels
something is going the wrong direction, she has the responsibility to do
something about it.
Perhaps a warning could have come first, perhaps it did and we just didn't
hear it.
Moderation does not mean they cannot post to the list. It means that the
list administrator gets the post first before it is posted to the list.
As a member of the BRC I personally take offense at Tim's statement
reagrding the intentions of BRC. He was not an active participant in any
of the discussions of the BRC and therefore has no authority to speak as
if he knows what the intent is. Because he is an AB member he has
presumed authority and people will accept his statements as fact without
really understanding that he has no basis for his statements.
How can the membership here make a sound judgement for themselves if the
information they are receiving is spoken without fact?
Ellen-
>From: "Shari Milks" <2skeeter(a)charter.net>
>Reply-To: WIGEN-L(a)rootsweb.com
>To: WIGEN-L(a)rootsweb.com
>Subject: Re: [WIGEN-L] Moderated members
>Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:52:50 -0700
>
>I back Deb up on this. Freedom of speech is first and foremost. A person
>should be allow to speak what they think and that includes making other
>people aware of what's going on so they can look into it and judge for
>themselves what happened.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Debie + Joe" <sebring(a)excel.net>
>To: <WIGEN-L(a)rootsweb.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 9:47 PM
>Subject: Re: [WIGEN-L] Moderated members
>
>
> > Tina,
> >
> > I have read the note that seems to be from both Tim and Jan. I guess I
> > missed why they are being moderated. Can I ask what happened to freedom of
> > speech? If the people he is talking about aren't subbed to the list, then
> > how do they know they are being brought up in an e-mail? I guess, you can
> > moderate me as well now if you feel the need. I believe that freedom of
> > speech should be as it is, freedom. Actually you are not the owner of this
> > mailing list, your just the caretaker of it. Did they receive a warning
> > that if this didn't stop they would be moderated or was this just done
> > because they are Representatives? Are you aware they can complain to
> > Rootsweb about being moderated and you would have to prove they did
> > something against the rules of mailing lists, which is usually containing
> > swearing or threats.
> >
> > I just think this whole thing is getting way out of hand here and that
> > everyone should have the right to speak their piece as long as it isn't
> > swearing or threatening,
> >
> > My 2 cents worth,
> >
> > Debie Blindauer
> >
> > Calumet & Sheboygan Counties
> >
> >
> >
> > ==== WIGEN Mailing List ====
> > Celebrate Wisconsin!
> > Visit the Washburn County WIGenWeb Project Pages
> >
http://www.rootsweb.com/~wiwashbu/
> >
>
>
>==== WIGEN Mailing List ====
>Celebrate Wisconsin!
>Visit the Trempealeau County WIGenWeb Project Pages
>http://www.rootsweb.com/~witrempe/
_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
==== WIGEN Mailing List ====
Celebrate Wisconsin!
Visit the Waupaca County WIGenWeb Project Pages
http://www.rootsweb.com/~wiwaupac/index.htm