How about just a general time lag? By the time I get to read and answer
anything, most of you people are either gently snoring in nice warm beds or
are bushy tailed and ready to pounce if the question is already answered
<chuckle, chuckle, chuckle>.
At 10:58 AM 2/25/2001 +0000, you wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Gerry Langford wrote:
> Do they not bother to read the earlier replies before firing off their
The time lag that digest-mode subscribers experience may be responsible
for some of these. As a list-mode subscriber, I find that topics often
seem to "echo" on these mailing lists.