Maynard, I agree with your assessment: that makes no sense to me either.
But maybe if they knew the copying was to be done for a group (vs. an
individual), and one that is likely to post the information on the web
at that, maybe they could be persuaded to make an exception.
From: VKRatliff(a)aol.com [mailto:VKRatliff@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 5:51 PM
Subject: Batte Papers
Carol Morrison provides reliable and bad news on the matter of accessing
The library limits the number of copies one can make from this box per
dread scenario likely to be undone only if or when the library
the stuff and puts it on line. As quickly as they got the Batte cards
would hope they would do an encore with the "papers."
It's almost impossible to criticize the LVA considering the trail they
blazed and are blazing with respect to putting stuff on their site but
one sounds at least a tad dumb to this guy who merely doesn't understand
I'll keep pursuing it but it appears a dead end for the moment. But
there and I have a hunch it's going to be big.
==== POYTHRESS Mailing List ====
Poythress Geneaology Research Web