Osiyo,
This candidate stands accused of a truth; that of condoning the action
of another individual. The condoning of a decision is a matter of
public record and has never been hidden. Condoning that particular
action was not an isolated incident, standing alone in the wind. Nor
was it offered and given without just and due deliberation. The
reference is at
<
http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/read/OHGEN/2005-12/1133712360> The
public thread is for any to read, along with other threads which led to
this decision by the Ohio SC.
Unless a totally different set of circumstances and evidence would come
forward to change my mind I would repeat the same decision to support an
individual's action.
What is missing from that public record are the warnings given to the
"delinked" individual to cease and desist his continuous bombardment to
individuals and the group as a whole to his singular point of view.
Due to the decision of the State Coordinator of Ohio to delink the
individual, this continuous bombardment has not ceased to the SC, and I
would suspect to the members of the AB, including the NC, in the course
of the grievance that was filed.
Individual rights ARE important to me, as is fairness. And, I repeat, I
may not have handled the situation exactly the same way as the SC of
Ohio did, but I still support the end result, or her decision, if you will.
A copy of this is sent to the OHGen-L.
Wado,
Bill Oliver
-=-
Linda Haas Davenport wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daryl Lytton" <dlytton(a)mindspring.com>
To: <USGENWEB-DISCUSS-L(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 11:05 AM
Subject: Question for Bill Oliver
| Bill wrote:
|
| > Still valuing the individual and standing for fairness
| > in all dealings has continued to be my concern....
|
| Bill...that statement does not concur with your actions. You
are an
| OHGenWeb CC. Recently, a certain SC of a certain state, broke
that states
| rules and national rules in order to delink a certain CC with
no fair
| hearing, that she personally didn't like. You, publicly on that
states
| required list, condoned her actions. Is that your platform for
running for
| NC?
|
| I'm not trying to be a wise-guy, several NCs have stood for
allowing SCs
| breaking state and national rules, and the current AB condones
such actions
| by refusing to correct that certain SCs actions. Regardless of
what you
| say, you condoning such actions, cannot be ignored when the
membership
| needs to decide who should be NC.
|
| Daryl
|
|
|