*I* didn't say your page did or didn't meet the requirements. I am
not the election committee and thankfully it wasn't my job to check
pages.
My comment was a general one to anyone who's shocked and surprised
that they have a page that's not under compliance. The first thing I
did when Dale contacted the list about copyrights was to bring my own
pages up to compliance. I didn't look at any other pages.
If I confused you I apologize.
Sincerely,
J. Asche
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Lorraine Sonnenberg Newsome
<lorraine1952(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
If you look at our page, it has the current year on it, and it also
has copyright information. No where in the guidelines does it state
that the two have to be "tied" together. Just that the current year
and copyright information need to be there. Therefore, our page meets
the requirements.
At 03:27 PM 2/15/2011, you wrote:
>Sorry -- here's the link to the archives.
>
>http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/OHGEN/2011-01/1296355464
>