Beginning March 2nd, 2020 the Mailing Lists functionality on RootsWeb will be discontinued. Users will no longer be able to send outgoing emails or accept incoming emails. Additionally, administration tools will no longer be available to list administrators and mailing lists will be put into an archival state.
Administrators may save the emails in their list prior to March 2nd. After that, mailing list archives will remain available and searchable on RootsWeb
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [STATE-COORD] Fw: State maps
Resent-Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 04:45:32 -0600
Resent-From: STATE-COORD-L(a)rootsweb.com
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 05:33:27 -0500
From: Linda Haas Davenport <lhaasdav(a)cox.net>
Reply-To: STATE-COORD-L(a)rootsweb.com
To: STATE-COORD-L(a)rootsweb.com
----- Original Message -----
From: <corajanee(a)shasta.com>
To: <lhaasdav(a)cox.net>
Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 11:04 PM
Subject: State maps
|I am in the beginning stages of making pages of counties of each
state.
| It will be a long time in the completing.
|
| I have CA, MT, OR, and SC finished and have started Utah.
|
|
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~shastaca/maps_index.html
|
| it is a 1914 atlas, we found the book in a shed after my
mother-in-law
| passed away. My problem is I don't know how to spread the word
that thay
| are available. Anyone can help themselves to them.
|
| I'm open to suggestions.
|
| Janie
|
Osiyo Nancy,
Good suggestions. I don't always look for "for further reading" but I
should. Most of what I do comes from the written page and though I can
reference it, that reference is seldom available to the average bloke.
Also, unless I read at least most of the sites that come through, say,
google, I am not sure of the accuracy. But, then, golly, who says the
written word is accurate. <smile>
Thanks for the suggestion and thanks for taking the time to read it.
Wado,
Bill Oliver
-=-
Sftrail(a)aol.com wrote:
>
>Bill, I'd suggest that for people who see something interesting
>in your piece and want to read more, you add links ....
>
>
= = = = clip-i-ty chop = = = = = =
Scott Anderson moved and Don Kear seconded to end discussion on Motion
2005-01-3 and bring it to a vote. In three days no one has objected, so
we will now vote on the main motion itself (see below).
*Instructions to vote*, reply to this e-mail so that it has the same
subject. You can either :
1) Leave your message addressed to the mailing list
ohgen-l(a)rootsweb.com, and vote publicly or
2) Vote privately off the list by sending one email to all three of our
OHGenWeb volunteer vote counters to *lboorom(a)fuse.net* and *also
include* a CC to these others- *Pcmom(a)aol.com* and to
*jdietz2(a)woh.rr.com*, for assurance of fair counting of the votes. All
three emails must be included on your email when you send your private
ballot for it to be counted as valid.
Your vote consists of either one of the following in the body of your
message:
*Yes*
or
*No*
A Yes is a vote in favor of Motion 2005-01-3.
A No is a vote against Motion 2005-01-3.
Please do not send anything else in your message as it will not be read
at this time. Thanks!
*You will have TEN days from the time of this message to respond.*
=================================================
Motion 2005 - 01 - 3
Be it resolved that the following article be included in the OHGenWeb
Project's bylaws, effective immediately upon approval by a 2/3 majority
of the legal votes cast:
The affairs of the OHGenWeb Project shall be conducted in accordance
with the most recent edition of the American Institute of
Parliamentarians' "Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure" (aka
"Sturgis"), subordinate to U.S. laws, the bylaws of the USGenWeb
Project, these bylaws, and adopted rules.