Hi Robert and Everyone:
Sorry for the delay in replying. I have had some real life emergencies that had to be
taken care of.
I would like to offer as an alternative the Amendment proposed by Ellen Pack:
http://www.natchezbelle.org/amendment/amendment.html
It is essentially the same as the one I proposed here. I do not have a problem with both
being considered (and both being sponsored by NV).
--
Joy Fisher
---- "Bremer wrote:
Don Tharp's proposed amendment to the USGenWeb bylaws has been
sponsored
by KSGenWeb and is now posted on the USGenWeb site at
http://www.usgenweb.org/volunteers/notice.shtml under the announcement
dated Feb. 20th. It would still need the sponsorship of additional
states before it would even become an ballot issue to vote on in the
next USGenWeb election.
Don's proposal is an amended version of what he originally presented to
NVGenWeb. Joy Fisher had proposed an alternative amendment in response
to Don's original proposal. Joy, do you still wish for NVGenWeb to
consider your drafted amendment or do the changes in Don's proposal
cover your initial concerns?
We can either do a simple poll on Don's amendment or a poll on Don's vs.
Joy's amendment or take other suggestions on how to handle the issue.
Yes, politics is not what we're necessarily about, but it is sometimes a
necessary responsibility. I think we can quickly tally NVGenWeb CC
preferences on this issue in short order and move on to other things
more genealogical and historical.
Let me know how you would prefer to proceed.
Robert Bremer
NVGenWeb SC
bremerr(a)oclc.org
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to NVGEN-request(a)rootsweb.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message