Well, living in California and having all the fun we're having with
the recall, I'm definitely against making recalls easier. >:)
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [STATE-COORD] bylaws revision
From: damorgan(a)nyx.net
To: STATE-COORD-L(a)rootsweb.com
>
> From: "Roger Swafford" <sagitta56(a)mchsi.com>
> Subject: [STATE-COORD] Bylaws Revision -- News
> Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 16:12:05 -0500
>(**Please forward to all appropriate project lists**)
>
>The Bylaws Revision Committee (BRC) has completed a first draft revision
>of Section 7 of Article XI. State Projects.
>
>Section 7. State Coordinators and Assistant State Coordinators
>are subject to removal for valid cause; by vote of the Advisory Board,
>or by majority vote of the Local Coordinators within the state
>subsequent to a recall petition submitted to and approved by the
>Advisory Board.
>
>All revision drafts may be viewed at
http://home.mchsi.com/~sagitta56/
The current version of Article XII, Section 9 (I think), says that the SC
can be removed with a 2/3rds vote of the state volunteers, with 75%
voting.
This is a radical change, going from 2/3rds to a majority vote. I guess
since the recall failed in Georgia, it was decided to make it easier to
remove an SC you are mad at.
Look out, Tim!
Let's get on with the voting on the bylaws. I have my NO vote ready.
David
TX
==== NVGEN Mailing List ====
Nevada started out to be Washoe, Sierra Nevada, Esmeralda, Bullion,
Oro Plata! We ended up with Nevada "Snowy"! Go figure!
Joann Betschart | mailto:pershinggenweb@surfmodesto.com
Pershing County, Nevada, US GenWeb Project coordinator