We could divide USGenWeb into a large number of smaller projects.
I prefer all projects be under the SC. But I'll never win that argument.
Charles
----- Original Message -----
From: "FISHER,JOY R" <jfisher(a)ucla.edu>
To: <NVGEN-L(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 7:16 AM
Subject: Re: [NVGEN] Fw: [STATE-COORD] Bylaws Revision -- News
Some special projects have never had an AB rep, such as the Kidz
Project
Quoting Gen <ryangb(a)nvbell.net>:
> Great question. To be 'fair' EACH project should have a rep.
> Charles
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Scism" <scismgenie(a)adelphia.net>
> To: <NVGEN-L(a)rootsweb.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [NVGEN] Fw: [STATE-COORD] Bylaws Revision -- News
>
>
> > Section 3. The members of each officially-approved USGenWeb Special
> > Project shall together elect one Special Projects Representative to
> > serve as
> > a member of The USGenWeb Project Advisory Board.
> > --
> >
> > Ok is that ONE Board member for each project or one for ALL projects
> > combined?
> > ~~~~
> >
> > Jeff Scism, IBSSG
> >
http://blacksheep.rootsweb.com/
> >
> >
> > ==== NVGEN Mailing List ====
> > 1930 Census is now partially online!
www.us-census.org/nevada.htm
> >
> >
>
>
> ==== NVGEN Mailing List ====
> Have you checked our archives recently? Lots of updates.
>
>
==== NVGEN Mailing List ====
Have you read how Nevada became a state? See the USGenWeb Nevada State
page!