Sandy,
Yes it is optional and you also have the same right as everyone else, but
after this amount of time, give your fingers and opinions a rest and observe
how peaceful it would be. As everyone has said, GIVE IT A REST, WE DON'T
WANT TO READ MORE OF YOUR OPINIONS FOR NOW! GOT IT? I would have thought by
now, reading all the posts that it is time for you to move onto some more *
PRODUCTIVE* genealogy.....?? I think it was mentioned in some form by
someone earlier that maybe we should consider blocking those who keep this
type of disructive behavior going. Sounds good to me. I vote yes alreadyl.
Joyce Harrison
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 7:53 PM, Sandy <teylu2(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Well, it's not as if I enjoy Derick's evangelical missives,
but as I
said, it is an optional list.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Mike & Diane <garebel(a)embarqmail.com>
wrote:
> That is the problem, things are not discussed on here and other lists,
> people are attacked demeaned and belittled. We are all tired of it and it
> just continues on as a personal crusade to try and make everyone see the
way
> they do and it just isn't going to and just won't work.
>
> Seems to me it should be given a rest already.
>
>
> NCGenWeb CC
> NCGenWeb Special Projects
> -------Original Message-------
>
> From: Sandy
> Date: 9/17/2008 6:56:14 PM
> To: ncgenweb-discuss(a)rootsweb.com
> Subject: Re: [NCGENWEB-DISCUSS] Current state of affairs of the Project
>
> Claudia, this is the discuss list. It's optional. If you don't want to
> Receive what's posted to it or participate, it's okay to just unsub.
>
> Sandy
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Mmaker52 <mmaker52(a)aol.com> wrote:
>> ENOUGH PLEASE
>>
>>
>>
>> In a message dated 09/16/08 23:01:03 Eastern Daylight Time, teylu2@gmail
> com writes:
>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Derick Hartshorn <DerickH(a)charter.net>
> wrote:
>>> Some of these individuals think that Nola incorporated the NCGenWeb
>>> for her own purposes. Nothing could be further from the truth.
>>> In spite of endless accusations, Nola incorporated the Project, FOR
>>> THE PROJECT!!!! We are now protected from any hijack attempts from
>>> sinister forces.
>>>
>>> The truth be known, the only reason that one particular individual
>>> discovered that Nola incorporated the NCGenWeb was because of an
>>> attempt by that particular person to incorporate the NCGenWeb Project
>>> as their own.
>>
>> Your hypothesis simply defies accepted principles of logic, Derick.
>>
>> If a singular individual is fearful for the project and wants to
>> protect it "on behalf of" the *full* membership, then logic says that
>> person would:
>> a) quickly incorporate the project as a corporation that _has_
>> members, which under NC statutes ensures the membership retains
>> control of its project. Nola didn't do this. She incorporated NCGenWeb
>> in July 2007, as a corporation which will have _no_ members, which
>> under NC statues means voting and control of the corporation rests
>> solely in the hands of the incorporator and/or directors.
>> b) Having taken that protective action, would be immediately
>> forthright and announce her actions to the full membership. Nola
>> didn't do this, either. She kept her corporation secret for more than
>> a year, and only came forward after I discovered what she'd done while
>> researching records of the Secty of State for an unrelated news
>> series.
>> c) Certainly would not publicly assert, three months after she'd
>> personally incorporated her state project, that it would be illegal
>> for USGW members to incorporate their own project and threaten to sue
>> if any members did.
>>
>> On the other hand....
>> My support of incorporation of the project by its *membership* is long
>> standing. Indeed, I - not knowing Nola had secretly incorporated
>> NCGenWeb 9 months earlier - was the one who made the motion in March
>> 2008 that our *membership* incorporate NCGenWeb as a nonprofit, which
>> the membership voted to approve. Why didn't Nola come forward then
>> with her 9 month old secret and inform us that she had _already_
>> personally incorporated NCGenWeb as an organization with _no_ members?
>> Particularly since our membership's vote was moot, as she knew,
>> because the law precludes any group from incorporating someone else's
>> corporation. ;-)
>>
>> If her action was so above-board, why did she incorporate in a manner
>> which seized control _from_ the membership and placed it solely in the
>> hands of the corporation's directors, and why did she keep it all
>> secret for more than a year until she was caught?
>>
>> Are you a director of Nola's corporation, Derick?
>>
>> -Sandy
>>
http://home.comcast.net/~teylu/ncgwinc.html
>>
>>>
>>
>> -------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> NCGENWEB-DISCUSS-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe'
without
> the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>>
>> -------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> NCGENWEB-DISCUSS-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe'
without
> the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> NCGENWEB-DISCUSS-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe'
without
> the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>
> ____________________________________________________________
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG -
http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1676 - Release Date:
9/17/2008
> 9:33 AM
>
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
NCGENWEB-DISCUSS-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without
the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
NCGENWEB-DISCUSS-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without
the quotes in the subject and the body of the message