And likewise, I will repost here my response to Diana's earlier message.
"Excuse me, but Philip sent his message late last night. I wrote back and
asked if it would be ok to post his message on the NCGenWeb Read Only list.
Angie's message was sent at 5 something this morning and at that time I
hadn't heard back from Philip with permission. Philip was the first
motion, and Angies came second. So far, there has been two other motions.
Just what I have to gain by "rigging" something like this, I can't see. I
am about to become weary of all the suspicions and such.
As far as my copying and pasting the original message into a new message, I
do that because I am aware that some folks browsers don't display the old
messages, only the new response that doesn't have the >> in front of them.
So by copy and pasting the message it all comes across like a new message and
I know it will show up on everyone's browser. But if anyone would like to
see the original messages, I will be glad to forward them.
Sharon"
Diana wrote:
I meant to send this (below) to the discuss list, but I replied to Sharon's
message and it was on the read-only list, which I didn't expect. Anyway,
Point of order ...
1. The motion was already made by Angie so Philip's was a 2nd to Angie's
motion (not the other way around).
2. It is my opinion, at least, that motions and 2nd's and such should be
made in public. If somebody is interested in something enough to be making
motions about it, why wouldn't they be subbed to this list so they can speak
up about it themselves? I just think people should make their own motions
and 2nd's to motions if they want to make them, and not relay them through
somebody else.
What does somebody else think about that?
Diana H. F.