Hi Derick,
Y'all do what you think is best. No problem with me.
But I did not write the email you referred to below. A man named David wrote
it to me. He sent you a copy. He is not associated with NCGenWeb as far as I
know.
I'm not sure if he is warning you or is warning me about states rights. I
found his email very confusing. I did not contact him about this. I assumed
someone did.
Otherwise,
I am very strongly for states rights, and Volunteers rights. However, I do
not wish to be on any committee for a runoff. Also, I have not raised any
question of partially at NCGenWeb. As a matter of fact, I plan to de-list
from this discussion board after the election.
I am, however, making myself available and offering to help any new SC in
any capacity, regardless of who is elected.
Peace and Best Regards,
Charles
----- Original Message -----
From: "Derick S. Hartshorn" <derickh(a)charter.net>
To: <NCGENWEB-DISCUSS-L(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 4:55 PM
Subject: [NCGENWEB-DISCUSS] Re: NCGenWeb election
At 02:59 AM 6/20/02, you wrote:
Charlie,
The specific bylaws governing the election - apply only to the AB
and NC. The States have their choices. No State's rights shall be
abrogated. You need to respect the precedent already established
by NCGenWeb's last election before this. Most vote get the position.
If you insist on this, you can count on opposition from many states
on this matter. Best to leave states' rights and choices alone!
David
Hi, Y'all,
I'm back from Branson, MO (which I STRONGLY recommend as a holiday spot)
and am overwhelmed with lots of mail (686 SPAMs were deleted at the Branson
Public Library) leaving me with 288 to deal with.
After having read all the mail, learning in the process that I had the
greatest number of affirmative votes in the NCGW SC election, I wish to
thank the EC for helping us with this process.
I also noted discussion for and against a run-off. I want to go on record
at this time as not caring, one way or the other, which motion prevails.
National allows us to conduct our business any way we want, within the
limitations of governing by-laws. On the other hand, nobody wants to see a
leader presiding with less than a mandate. I certainly don't want the
stigma of illegitimacy placed upon my shoulders.
I didn't tally the responses on the issue at hand. Many of those who have
raised questions of partiality in the past need fear not from me. If y'all
want a runoff, go for it! I do believe, however, that the folks who favor
the run-off be appointed to a committee to determine the best way to
conduct this run-off.
Signing off until I learn the results of this discussion.
--Derick