----->>"diane k" <skunk(a)coastalnet.com> wrote:
It doesn't matter how the folks voted. No one (even Sandy) was
allowed to
be heard to completion.
---------------------->>>
Wrong, Diane. Speak for youself. YOU are the one who had more to say, not me.
I did not feel pre-empted at all. ;-)
And I have NO complaints about the vote or about the setting up of the new
Discuss-L list.
I do have a problem with your "baiting" people via the NCGenWeb-L list.
You have been told - repeatedly - to stop posting your controversial
messages to NCGenWeb-L. Yet you selectively post to NCGenWeb-L anything you
want to ensure goes to all NCGenWeb volunteers.
per our SC's message of yesterday:
6) Protracted discussion of any issue, controversial or not, should
be
taken to NCGENWEB-DISCUSS. Just because a message was posted initially on
NCGENWEB does not mean that the reply must be posted here. If it's a
rebuttal to someone else's challenge or provocation, then it should be sent
to -DISCUSS or handled privately.
But you continue to ignore her, as witnessed in your voluminuous message
this morning regarding your version of your multiple complaints over the
past many weeks.
You've made your point, Diane. You do not like our SC. You have made this
clear.
But more than half the NCGenWeb volunteers voted, and overwhelmingly
support our SC.
For someone who purports such support of democratic principles, Diane, you
seem to be completely ignorant of the most fundamental of those
principles....the *majority* rules.
Sandy