Aren't we CCs capable of reading the bylaws ourselves. Why do we need to go
so far as to file a grievance? Grievances usually get filed away in file
13 anyway, because the AB doesn't even know what their own responsibilities
are at the national level. Maybe that is why you are pushing the idea....you
already know that is how it works.
But Angie it will always be our right to debate ( i hope), and we shall
debate whether it will solve anything or not, because it is our inherent
right. And finally this list was created just for that very purpose!!!
Remember no one has to be subbed here unless they want to stay
informed--anyone can drop out at any time. This list is for the discussion
of project business or anything else concerning genealogy, and i don't
appreciate you trying to tell us to hush up. By discussion, be arrive at
truth. Does anyone have anything against that?
Anyway, i wouldn't expect you to disagree with your boss who appointed you
to cover his back.
diane
----- Original Message -----
From: "Angie Rayfield" <angie(a)inmyattic.com>
To: <NCGENWEB-DISCUSS-L(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 10:20 PM
Subject: Re: [NCGENWEB-DISCUSS] Ron Eason's Resignation from NCGenWeb
At 09:02 PM 8/21/2002 -0400, diane wrote:
>One small comment Derick.
>
>It is YOUR Board, not OUR Board. We had no hand in the selection process
or
>even the organizational process....to me this is a clear
violation of the
>National bylaws that indicate that "the State" (we CCs are named the
>foundation-- not the SC who is only a coordinator) shall create
>organizational policy to govern us.
I don't know if anyone will agree with me (and Derick especially may not
appreciate me), but at this point, I'm not sure I'm overly concerned by
that detail.
Whether you agree with him or not, it should be quite apparent that Derick
is not going to suddenly do a 180 degree turnaround and toss his
organizational plan out the window, no matter how many pointed comments
may
be made on this list. At this point, I would respectfully suggest
that
anyone who believes that this set-up is in violation of the national
by-laws should file a grievance through the appropriate channels as set
out
by those same by-laws.
If it's not worth the trouble to have the matter looked at and decided
upon
by the people authorized to do so by those by-laws, or people are not
sure
enough of their position to take that stand, then could we please let the
issue drop? It serves no useful purpose to continue to beat the subject
to
death in this forum -- I don't think the people on either side
are likely
to be swayed at this point.
If, at the end of the process, it's determined that Derick overstepped,
then he'll be told what he needs to do to comply, and I'd go so far as to
say that he would owe an apology to the CC's that have protested. Of
course, if it's determined that Derick has *not* overstepped, I'd say an
apology would be due to him....
Angie
--Boundary_(ID_imw82a/WJ7MgkbuymK6pJw)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-avg=cert;
x-avg-checked=avg-ok-268E8A2
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-disposition: inline
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (
http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.381 / Virus Database: 214 - Release Date: 8/2/2002
--Boundary_(ID_imw82a/WJ7MgkbuymK6pJw)--