Beginning March 2nd, 2020 the Mailing Lists functionality on RootsWeb will be discontinued. Users will no longer be able to send outgoing emails or accept incoming emails. Additionally, administration tools will no longer be available to list administrators and mailing lists will be put into an archival state.
Administrators may save the emails in their list prior to March 2nd. After that, mailing list archives will remain available and searchable on RootsWeb
<<unless we the NCGW decided in advance to award the seat to the winner of a
plurality.>>
I vote we do just that--the winner who just won the majority of the votes
takes the position and we get on with things.
My best,
--DS
DS,
Your suggestion is interesting. There is one problem, however. Volunteers
can not vote to set aside the bylaws.
Those particular bylaws are reproduced here for your perusal.
ARTICLE VII. ELECTION PROCEDURES
Section 4. A majority of those members voting shall elect. No member shall
hold more than one voting office at any one time.
ARTICLE XII. STATE PROJECTS
Section 3. It shall be the responsibility of each state organization to
ensure that the state project is in compliance with the stated bylaws of The
USGenWeb Project.
*** end quote
We must therefore hold a run-off election or else we'll be in violation of
the bylaws. In our election, the majority of members voted for other
candidates, and by a large margin.
Again, I'd like to express my personal observation how well the election was
conducted by all of the candidates. I'm sure none of them now wish to ignore
the bylaws that they will be responsible to enforce when properly elected.
Best Regards,
Charles Barnum, USGenWeb Volunteer
----- Original Message -----
From: <DAnnAStoddard(a)aol.com>
To: <NCGENWEB-DISCUSS-L(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 8:51 PM
Subject: Re: [NCGENWEB-DISCUSS] [NCGENWEB] Final Results of the State
Coordinator Ele...
<<unless we the NCGW decided in advance to award the seat to the winner of
a
plurality.>>
I vote we do just that--the winner who just won the majority of the votes
takes the position and we get on with things.
My best,
--DS
To the leadership,
BTW, I don't recall that the EC is empowered to "officially" declare anyone
the winner of anything. They are merely to arrange for the collection and
counting of votes. It is up to our local area to determine how winners are
selected.
Derick Hartshorn received substantially less than half of the vote. There
should be a runoff between him and Ron, unless we the NCGW decided in
advance to award the seat to the winner of a plurality. But we didn't do
that.
Until a candidate has won a *majority* of the votes in NC, he cannot be
named
the winner of this event.
Could you call on the EC to set up a run off election?
diane
Congratulations Derrick.
It is hoped that much light has been shed on
things that are much in need of correction and
that emphasis will be placed on those things
that some people think are important, even if
they are not popular.
There is much work ahead and you will need to
foremost remember that even those that seem
so disagreeable are not enemies of the state, but
members of the same project and interested in
more than just the pages and data. As with any
leadership position, recognition of people's strengths
and weaknesses is very important, because those
that are only interested in the pages and the data
are not going to be there to help when you really
need a hand. It will be those that have an interest
in the inner-workings of the project and actually
have an opinion and are willing to speak it.
Good Luck, And God Bless.
Ron
Hello Fellow CC's.
Volunteer Bill of Rights and Responsibilities
I am very pleased that a new and official committee is now being established
concerning Volunteers Bill Of Rights. I have applied to become a member. I
was one of the people hoping it would be established, and I'm quite happy
about it. I am concerned that they added the words "and Responsibilities" to
the title of the committee. The topic should be about volunteers rights, not
about adding responsibilities. But I can live with that.
I'm also somewhat concerned that "elected" USGenWeb Member's rights, Like
State Coordinators and others, will be included in the subject. I have no
objection to Elected Members having their own committee, but by mixing the
two subjects--Volunteers and Officers, I fear the elected members might take
over at the expense of those who are not elected. Again, I can live with it.
I have already drafted a Bill of Rights for Volunteers consisting of Eight
Articles which I think address the main causes of conflict in USGenWeb. If
I'm allowed to become a member of the committee, I will present my ideas
when the Chair permits and at the appropriate time.
I hope you will consider joining the Volunteer Bill of Rights and
Responsibilities Committee to express your views and contribute to making
USGenWeb an organization dedicated to providing free genealogical
information to the public. A good show on the committee from North Carolina
would be a feather in our caps.
Charles Barnum
Congratulations Derick.
Charles Barnum
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Eason" <rkeason(a)tir.com>
To: <NCGENWEB-DISCUSS-L(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 7:05 PM
Subject: [NCGENWEB-DISCUSS] Election
Congratulations Derrick.
It is hoped that much light has been shed on
things that are much in need of correction and
that emphasis will be placed on those things
that some people think are important, even if
they are not popular.
There is much work ahead and you will need to
foremost remember that even those that seem
so disagreeable are not enemies of the state, but
members of the same project and interested in
more than just the pages and data. As with any
leadership position, recognition of people's strengths
and weaknesses is very important, because those
that are only interested in the pages and the data
are not going to be there to help when you really
need a hand. It will be those that have an interest
in the inner-workings of the project and actually
have an opinion and are willing to speak it.
Good Luck, And God Bless.
Ron
Y'all
Being three hours under the deadline, I would like to take this tardy
opportunity to publicly nominate Elizabeth Harris for the position of USGW
SouthEast/Middle Atlantic County Coordinator Representative. Knowing that
this position is ideally suited to Elizabeth's temperament, her
impartiality which was often stretched to limit and her indomitable spirit,
I am deeply honored to nominate her for this position. Having worked
closely with Elizabeth for more than four years, I think she richly
deserves to represent a greater number of CCs so that they may have the
opportunity to appreciate a real lady, one who has been the bulwark of our
North Carolina GenWeb Project. A voice of moderation and calming, I hope to
see her as a stabilizing force in an organization that so desperately needs
stability.
Respectfully submitted,
Derick S. Hartshorn
Asst. Co-SC, NCGenWeb
Burke/Catawba Co.
At 05:51 PM 6/14/02, you wrote:
>Ladies & Gentlemen: The nominations for the upcoming USGenWeb Election close
>tonight at midnight. If you have been thinking of nominating someone please
>do so as soon as possible to be sure your nomination is recorded before
>midnight Central Time.
>
>Nominees at this time are:
>
>NC - Nominated not yet declared:
>Teresa Lindquist
>Jana Black
>Trey Holt
>Linda Haas Davenport
>Keith Giddeon
>
>NC - Candidates
>Richard Harris
>John Rigdon
>
>Special Project - Tombstone - Nominated not yet declared:
>Joe Miller
>(If Joe does not declare for this seat then the Tombstone Representative
>seat on the AB will be vacant without other nominations)
>
>NENC State coordinator - Nominated not yet declared:
>Patrick Hays
>Tina Vickery
>
>NENC County Coordinator - Nominated not yet declared:
>Bill Oliver
>
>NENC County Coordinator - Candidate
>Jan Cortez
>
>NWPL County Coordinator - Nominated not yet declared:
>Gail Meyer Kilgore
>
>NWPL County Coordinator - Candidate
>Kelly Courtney-Blizzard
>
>SEMA County Coordinator - Nominated not yet declared:
>None
>
>SEMA County Coordinator - Candidate or accepted waiting on verification of
>eligibility from SC.
>Heather Jones De-George (waiting on SC response)
>Jimmy Epperson
>Vickie Stevens
>Tom Parker
>Diane Kelly (waiting on SC response)
>
>SWSC State Coordinator - Nominated not yet declared:
>Larry Flesher (If Larry does not accept the nomination then the SWSC SC seat
>will be vacant)
>
>SWSC County Coordinator - Nominated not yet declared:
>Joe Miller
>
>SWSC County Coordinator - Candidates
>Phyllis Rippee
>Bettie Wood
>Scott Burow (waiting for SC verification)
>
>The nomination site is:
>http://www.rootsweb.com/~usgwelections/2002nominations.html
>
>If you wish to nominate anyone for any position (or volunteer for any
>position - the nominator's information is confidential) then please do so as
>soon as possible.
>
>Thank you
>EC
Ladies & Gentlemen: The nominations for the upcoming USGenWeb Election close
tonight at midnight. If you have been thinking of nominating someone please
do so as soon as possible to be sure your nomination is recorded before
midnight Central Time.
Nominees at this time are:
NC - Nominated not yet declared:
Teresa Lindquist
Jana Black
Trey Holt
Linda Haas Davenport
Keith Giddeon
NC - Candidates
Richard Harris
John Rigdon
Special Project - Tombstone - Nominated not yet declared:
Joe Miller
(If Joe does not declare for this seat then the Tombstone Representative
seat on the AB will be vacant without other nominations)
NENC State coordinator - Nominated not yet declared:
Patrick Hays
Tina Vickery
NENC County Coordinator - Nominated not yet declared:
Bill Oliver
NENC County Coordinator - Candidate
Jan Cortez
NWPL County Coordinator - Nominated not yet declared:
Gail Meyer Kilgore
NWPL County Coordinator - Candidate
Kelly Courtney-Blizzard
SEMA County Coordinator - Nominated not yet declared:
None
SEMA County Coordinator - Candidate or accepted waiting on verification of
eligibility from SC.
Heather Jones De-George (waiting on SC response)
Jimmy Epperson
Vickie Stevens
Tom Parker
Diane Kelly (waiting on SC response)
SWSC State Coordinator - Nominated not yet declared:
Larry Flesher (If Larry does not accept the nomination then the SWSC SC seat
will be vacant)
SWSC County Coordinator - Nominated not yet declared:
Joe Miller
SWSC County Coordinator - Candidates
Phyllis Rippee
Bettie Wood
Scott Burow (waiting for SC verification)
The nomination site is:
http://www.rootsweb.com/~usgwelections/2002nominations.html
If you wish to nominate anyone for any position (or volunteer for any
position - the nominator's information is confidential) then please do so as
soon as possible.
Thank you
EC
Hi Folks,
I have to take full blame for the lack of an introduction for those
folks. At the time I was doing
good just to get them going and on the mail list, considering my health.
My apologies to all.
And welcome to you all.
Sharon
NCGENWEB-DISCUSS-D-request(a)rootsweb.com wrote:
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>NCGENWEB-DISCUSS-D Digest Volume 02 : Issue 35
>
>Today's Topics:
> #1 [NCGENWEB-DISCUSS] New Members ? ["Ron Eason" <rkeason(a)tir.com>]
> #2 Re: [NCGENWEB-DISCUSS] New Members [Charlie and Janet <ryangb(a)nvbell.n]
> #3 Re: [NCGENWEB-DISCUSS] New Members [RockyIII(a)aol.com]
> #4 Re: [NCGENWEB-DISCUSS] New Members ["Derick S. Hartshorn" <derickh@cha]
> #5 [NCGENWEB-DISCUSS] problems with v ["Beaufort" <y8g3n2ws(a)coastalnet.co]
> #6 Re: [NCGENWEB-DISCUSS] problems wi [Charlie and Janet <ryangb(a)nvbell.n]
> #7 Re: [NCGENWEB-DISCUSS] problems wi [ncgen(a)mindspring.com (Elizabeth Ha]
> #8 Re: [NCGENWEB-DISCUSS] problems wi [Angie Rayfield <angie@angiesplace.]
>
>Administrivia:
>To unsubscribe from NCGENWEB-DISCUSS-D, send a message to
>
> NCGENWEB-DISCUSS-D-request(a)rootsweb.com
>
>that contains in the body of the message the command
>
> unsubscribe
>
>and no other text. No subject line is necessary, but if your software
>requires one, just use unsubscribe in the subject, too.
>
>______________________________
>
>
> Part 1.2
>
> Content-Type:
>
> message/rfc822
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Part 1.3
>
> Content-Type:
>
> message/rfc822
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Part 1.4
>
> Content-Type:
>
> message/rfc822
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Part 1.5
>
> Content-Type:
>
> message/rfc822
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Part 1.6
>
> Content-Type:
>
> message/rfc822
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Part 1.7
>
> Content-Type:
>
> message/rfc822
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Part 1.8
>
> Content-Type:
>
>
Angie,
I agree that it is problem to change an email addresess. I've had my
current one for several years. I changed it once because of all the junk
mail I was getting, but it only took a few days for the junk mail to start
arriving on my new account, so I'll not change it again.
I also have hotmail accounts for misc. business. I have no problem with
using them. I just had a strange feeling about voting using a hotmail
address.
I voted last year and they placed a cookie on my computer to verify me. I
did not know if using hotmail would interfear with verification.
Thanks for your feedback.
Have a wonderful day everyone.
Charles B.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Angie Rayfield" <angie(a)angiesplace.behosting.com>
To: <NCGENWEB-DISCUSS-L(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: [NCGENWEB-DISCUSS] problems with voter eligibilty?
At 10:57 PM 6/5/2002 -0700, Charlie and Janet wrote:
>Hi Everyone,
>Yeap, I 'm new here, and do not know every email that has been sent to the
>list in the last 2 or 3 years, but from Paul's last three emails on the
>Announce list, I see that some CC's have hotmail or yahoo emails. Would it
>not be better if for voting purposes if CC's used their email address
>assigned to them by their ISP's.
>It seems a little scary to me that someone can vote using a hotmail
address.
I can't speak for anyone in particular, but I know a lot of people use
hotmail and places like that so that they can keep their email address even
if they change ISPs. That's why I use 'em -- it's a total pain to change
email addresses!
Angie
>As of today's date, 8 of these county websites give email addresses which
>bounce as "unknown". Even though our Co SCs have turned in alternative email
>addresses so that these 8 may vote.
Most of these CCs have been contacted and asked to update their pages.
Following previous guidelines, they are entitled to a grace period in which
to get their pages in order. If they fail to do so, then their counties
will be put up for adoption.
>16 counties have a date of 1998 to 2001.
>5 have no date at all, not even a copyright date.
We have no formal requirement for a date on the page, although personally I
think it's highly desirable, and that a page carry a prominent statement of
when it was last updated and what has been added recently. It's already
been suggested that people examine their pages to see if the home page
needs refreshing, even if the subsidiary pages are being maintained.
Elizabeth Harris
NCGenWeb project: http://www.rootsweb.com/~ncgenweb/
Winston-Salem NC area genealogy: http://www.fmoran.com/ (note new address!)
I would like to inquire of our 3 ASCs, two of which (Paul & Derick) are now
acting co SCs, what is the problem with abt 24 counties in NC (whose host
have been given the right to vote) that have some serious problems with
those counties.
As of today's date, 8 of these county websites give email addresses which
bounce as "unknown". Even though our Co SCs have turned in alternative email
addresses so that these 8 may vote.
Late last night, I emailed 19 addresses as shown on 19 counties pages which
showed a different email address than Paul presented....8 bounced and 3
responded, leaving 7 that have not yet responded to the address on their
page....it may be early to say...but, i have written to some of these people
before and never gotten a reply...some are yahoo and hotmail addresses.
Below is what i found after just looking at less than 1/2 the county sites,
even though abt May 13 they were asked to update their pages and dates.
16 counties have a date of 1998 to 2001.
5 have no date at all, not even a copyright date.
2 links on the NCGenWeb county selection page point to URLs hosted by folks
other than those which Paul named.
2 has no email address offered at all.
2 no ncgenweb logo -one with a 2001 date
4 no usgenweb logo-one dated 1999 has never had the logo ever.
2 no link to the usgenweb project-one dated 1998
Are these members in good standing and thus qualified to vote?
diane
Hi Everyone,
Yeap, I 'm new here, and do not know every email that has been sent to the
list in the last 2 or 3 years, but from Paul's last three emails on the
Announce list, I see that some CC's have hotmail or yahoo emails. Would it
not be better if for voting purposes if CC's used their email address
assigned to them by their ISP's.
It seems a little scary to me that someone can vote using a hotmail address.
Anyway, hope we have a 100% turnout.
Charles Barnum
At 06:34 PM 6/5/02, Ron Eason wrote:
>Not sure how new some of the following members are,
>but it is possible that they were not formally introduced,
>or maybe that I or someone else missed them,
>but just in case,
>I would like to say "welcome" to them.
>
>And if anyone else missed it, maybe you would like to
>say hello to them as well.
>-----------------------------
>Brunswick - Natasha Miles - bittersweet3(a)yahoo.com
>
>Haywood - Mary Newsum - paloma(a)drizzle.com
>
>Rutherford - Teresa McLaughlin - tamclaughlin(a)att.net
>
>Transylvania - Linda Hoxit-Raxter - linidi(a)brinet.com
>
>Union - Ann Medlin Sendgikoski - annemedlin(a)aol.com
>
>Wake - Rocky Strickland - RockyIII(a)aol.com
>
>Good to have everyone,
>Enjoy.
>Ron Eason
I join all the folks in the NCGW to welcome these fine folks. The pay
stinks but the benefits are enormous.
Don't ever hesitate to ask what you may think is a "dumb" question. We're
all here to help--so don't suffer in silence.
--Derick S. Hartshorn
Burke/Catawba Co. page/list
Acting or Asst. or something..SC
> Not sure how new some of the following members are,
> but it is possible that they were not formally introduced,
> or maybe that I or someone else missed them, but just
> in case, I would like to say "welcome" to them.
> And if anyone else missed it, maybe you would like to
> say hello to them as well.
> -----------------------------
> Brunswick - Natasha Miles - bittersweet3(a)yahoo.com
> Haywood - Mary Newsum - paloma(a)drizzle.com
> Rutherford - Teresa McLaughlin - tamclaughlin(a)att.net
> Transylvania - Linda Hoxit-Raxter - linidi(a)brinet.com
> Union - Ann Medlin Sendgikoski - annemedlin(a)aol.com
> Wake - Rocky Strickland - RockyIII(a)aol.com
Thanks! I don't feel too new though, as I've been doing the Wake County site
since D'Ann Stoddard (Nash and formerly Johnston and Wake CC) prevailed upon
me last August.
Rocky Strickland
Wake County Coordinator
http://www.rootsweb.com/~ncwake/
Not sure how new some of the following members are,
but it is possible that they were not formally introduced,
or maybe that I or someone else missed them,
but just in case,
I would like to say "welcome" to them.
And if anyone else missed it, maybe you would like to
say hello to them as well.
-----------------------------
Brunswick - Natasha Miles - bittersweet3(a)yahoo.com
Haywood - Mary Newsum - paloma(a)drizzle.com
Rutherford - Teresa McLaughlin - tamclaughlin(a)att.net
Transylvania - Linda Hoxit-Raxter - linidi(a)brinet.com
Union - Ann Medlin Sendgikoski - annemedlin(a)aol.com
Wake - Rocky Strickland - RockyIII(a)aol.com
Good to have everyone,
Enjoy.
Ron Eason
I'd like to say Hello and Welcome as well. There are some great folks here!
Charles Barnum
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Eason" <rkeason(a)tir.com>
To: <NCGENWEB-DISCUSS-L(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 3:34 PM
Subject: [NCGENWEB-DISCUSS] New Members ?
Not sure how new some of the following members are,
but it is possible that they were not formally introduced,
or maybe that I or someone else missed them,
but just in case,
I would like to say "welcome" to them.
And if anyone else missed it, maybe you would like to
say hello to them as well.
-----------------------------
Brunswick - Natasha Miles - bittersweet3(a)yahoo.com
Haywood - Mary Newsum - paloma(a)drizzle.com
Rutherford - Teresa McLaughlin - tamclaughlin(a)att.net
Transylvania - Linda Hoxit-Raxter - linidi(a)brinet.com
Union - Ann Medlin Sendgikoski - annemedlin(a)aol.com
Wake - Rocky Strickland - RockyIII(a)aol.com
Good to have everyone,
Enjoy.
Ron Eason
Although I am familiar with the nominees for SC, it would still be very
helpful to hear their views and especially their GOALS for NCGenWeb--or
even issues that they think are important to address.
Reading this would certainly be helpful to me in making my decision.
And after reading them, I'd like to be able to ask them a question or two...
I thought they were going to put up something on some web pages?
Has this been done?
Virginia Crilley
NCGENWEB-DISCUSS-D-request(a)rootsweb.com wrote:
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>NCGENWEB-DISCUSS-D Digest Volume 02 : Issue 32
>
>Today's Topics:
> #1 Re: [NCGENWEB-DISCUSS] Instructing [Angie Rayfield <angie@angiesplace.]
> #2 Re: [NCGENWEB-DISCUSS] Instructing ["Terria W. Baynor" <hoji@skantech.]
> #3 Re: [NCGENWEB-DISCUSS] Instructing [Elizabeth Harris <ncgen@mindspring]
> #4 Re: [NCGENWEB-DISCUSS] Instructing [Elizabeth Harris <ncgen@mindspring]
> #5 Re: [NCGENWEB-DISCUSS] Instructing ["Terria W. Baynor" <hoji@skantech.]
> #6 Re: [NCGENWEB-DISCUSS] Instructing ["Terria W. Baynor" <hoji@skantech.]
> #7 Re: [NCGENWEB-DISCUSS] Instructing [Elizabeth Harris <ncgen@mindspring]
> #8 [NCGENWEB-DISCUSS] breaking frames [Sandy <teylu(a)mac.com>]
>
>Administrivia:
>To unsubscribe from NCGENWEB-DISCUSS-D, send a message to
>
> NCGENWEB-DISCUSS-D-request(a)rootsweb.com
>
>that contains in the body of the message the command
>
> unsubscribe
>
>and no other text. No subject line is necessary, but if your software
>requires one, just use unsubscribe in the subject, too.
>
>______________________________
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
>
> Re: [NCGENWEB-DISCUSS] Instructing new CC's
> From:
>
> Angie Rayfield <angie(a)angiesplace.behosting.com>
> Date:
>
> Fri, 31 May 2002 09:15:30 -0500
> To:
>
> NCGENWEB-DISCUSS-L(a)rootsweb.com
>
>
> At 06:47 AM 5/31/2002 -0400, Terria Baynor wrote:
>
>> Does the EIN require that tax forms be filed quarterly? Have they been
>> filed as required? Will they be easily transferred to the next SC?
>> These
>> are all questions that need to be answered, especially before the
>> election
>> of a new SC. They need to know what their duties are.
>
>
> I believe Paul covered these questions:
>
> "The NCGenWeb Project and name was registered with the Secretary of State
> of North Carolina as an unincorporated club or association. Registration
> required the notarized signature and physical address of the principal
> officer of the association, at the time Sharon Williamson. A "one-time"
> filing fee of $50.00 was paid. The NCGenWeb Project is registered as
> "owned" by its members, not Sharon.
>
> A tax number (EIN) was obtained to register the NCGenWeb Project with the
> Internal Revenue Service as an unincorporated non profit association. The
> NCGenWeb Project is not registered as a 501(c) organization and is not
> required to file any returns because it does not sell anything, accept
> contributions, collect dues, or incur expenses. No registration fee was
> paid."
>
> The tax number itself would not need to be transferred to the next SC
> -- it belongs to the registered entity, not an individual
An addition to the above statements:
I don't remember anything about being required to file
any papers quarterly, or even yearly. But there is a $35
renewal fee at some point. I think every five years or so.
(I'm sitting here looking at the forms and it doesn't say
that part there, but I think I remember it being five years.)
I will be glad to personally pay that fee when it comes
time to renew.
>
>
> We can't stop someone from using a domain name, but if I remember
> right, Sharon has dealt with at least two web-hosts, who agreed to
> remove the pages as violating copyright/service mark regulations. I
> don't know if the current webhost has been contacted, but I believe
> that it's something that should be considered -- on the ncgenweb.net
> page, they're now displaying a logo marking the NCGenWeb name as
> trademarked. The name is already registered as a service mark
> belonging to the NCGenWeb Project, so at the very least, the logo is
> misleading and unethical. And possibly illegal.
I contacted both GeoCities and Tripod. They both
immediately pulled down the pages that came up
under the NCGenWeb domains. I also contacted
internettrash.com where the pages are now located
and they did nothing.
I also contacted the folks who issued the NCGenWeb
domains. At first they pulled the domains, but later
challenged us and reissued the domains. They had
checked with the state of NC and not found any
legal evidence that we existed. That is one of the reasons
I found it necessary to apply for the service mark. That
made us exist legally. And it was presented to the CCs
at the time that this action was being taken.
And no, at the time I don't think it was necessary to keep
the CCs posted on every little aspect of things that occurred.
This was war of sorts and sometimes one just has to keep
silent in order to have the best advantage.
>
>> I also never understood why anyone in this state got upset that the
>> domains
>> disappeared from our grasp considering, the vote of the CC's was, as
>> Angie
>> said, against purchasing the domain. If we didn't want it, then why
>> are we
>> complaining? It was never ours, through our own decision, so why
>> were we so
>> possessive?
>
I was never much upset about the domains disappearing
from our grasp. It was the way in which our NAME was being
used that upset me. Just because we did not want to purchase
the domains didn't mean someone else has a right to associate
our name with a tasteless web page.
>
>
> Angie
>
> ______________________________
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
>
> Re: [NCGENWEB-DISCUSS] Instructing new CC's
> From:
>
> "Terria W. Baynor" <hoji(a)skantech.net>
> Date:
>
> Fri, 31 May 2002 11:37:47 -0400
> To:
>
> NCGENWEB-DISCUSS-L(a)rootsweb.com
>
>
>Angie & list,
>
> Not everyone agrees that it was the
>right thing to do. If that was the case, then why aren't the other
>states following suit?
>
Maybe the other states aren't following suit because
either their names haven't been dragged through the
barn yard, or they see how I have been personally
slandered and don't want the same treatment for
themselves.
>
>
>Terria
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
>
> Re: [NCGENWEB-DISCUSS] Instructing new CC's
> From:
>
> "Terria W. Baynor" <hoji(a)skantech.net>
> Date:
>
> Fri, 31 May 2002 17:15:40 -0400
> To:
>
> NCGENWEB-DISCUSS-L(a)rootsweb.com
>
>
>Sharon told us on the manditory list. When I questioned her about who
>was going to have to file it and she said that she could sure file a
>little paper quarterly....it wasn't a problem.
>Terria
>
Well, Sharon doesn't remember that conversation and I have
lost my e-mail from that area of time. So if you have an e-mail
that says that, well and fine. At any rate, I don't remember
anything about having to file quarterly or at any time other than
to renew the registration after five years.
This message I responded to was rather long, so I have
snipped out the parts that I wasn't responding to. For the full
messages check the original Discuss digest posting.
Sharon
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>