Without getting into a lot of unnecessary details, over the past few months
there have been some problems with the USGenWeb Project Census project.
Those of you who have subscribed to lists where there have been major
disagreements are aware of just how heated and confusing the arguments can
get. Mostly I've read through the emails posted to the State Coord. list
and ignored them.... not even sure I understand the disagreement. I
believe that perhaps it boiled down to a simple case of personalities not
mixing.... people complaining about the efficiency of a separate project,
about who was in charge of what, just old basic "pride" issues, etc.
Anyway, Tim Stowell published this today and asked us to forward it to you.
He is trying hard to resolve the issues, I believe. For those of you who
want to find out more, make comments to the main project, or to get
involved in the Census Project itself, I'd suggest you join one of the main
USGenWeb Project discussion mailing lists.
Thanks.
Corky
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 23:02:18 -0500
From: Tim Stowell <tstowell(a)chattanooga.net>
To: STATE-COORD-L(a)rootsweb.com
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20000330230218.01777820(a)mail.chattanooga.net>
Subject: [STATE-COORD-L] Census - Open Letter - Alternative Proposal
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
State-Coordinators - please forward to your CCs - Thanks - Tim
- --------------------------
Census Project volunteers, Board members:
I've taken a step back and thought on the census issues raised over the
last few months. I've received input over several weeks from members
throughout the Project.
I ask that you think of the census project as a whole series of tasks to be
completed.
From the time a person volunteers to transcribe a census for a
county/parish/borough until it goes on-line for all to view several items
must be addressed by coordinators along that path. Perhaps a solution can
be found by a division of tasks rather than a merger of projects.
Since everyone knows more or less how things are handled now, I'll not go
into that here but instead offer the following for your consideration over
the next couple of days. I would appreciate feedback as to its workability
and palatability.
I believe that the tasks involved include: recruiting volunteers,
acknowledging their requests to volunteer on a timely basis, assignment of
the transcription, maintaining web sites of what's available for
transcription and/or status, assisting the volunteer in getting the
materials to transcribe and software if need be, answering questions
concerning transcriptions, keeping in contact with the volunteers to make
sure that the transcription is proceeding without problems, assisting the
volunteers in getting the completed transcription uploaded or turned in to
the Project, formatting the files for viewing by the public, storing the
files, updating web sites to current status of completed transcriptions.
There may be other minor jobs but I believe that this list should cover the
bulk of the process of getting census material on-line.
Therefore please consider breaking down the tasks as follows:
USGW Census Project (CP) retains their name, logo and project coordinator:
recruits volunteers, acknowledges their requests to volunteer on a timely
basis, assigns transcription, maintains their pages to show assigned
census, assists volunteers in getting materials, software, answering
questions, keeps in contact with volunteers, assists transcribers in
getting the materials uploaded, modifies their recruiting web sites that
transcription is complete.
USGW Archives Census Project (ACP) retains their name, logo and project
coordinator:
receives completed transcriptions from CP, formats files for viewing,
stores files, modifies census on-line web sites to current URL for stored
files, contacts appropriate CP file manager with any questions regarding
the files.
Division of the tasks in this manner allows both projects to continue
without duplication of transcriptions, singularity of purpose, increased
effectiveness, better service to the transcribers and to the public at large.
Working together as a task based mission rather than being divided by
personalities would I believe lead to a stronger project in the long run.
I would encourage both projects to maintain archived mailing lists of
volunteers / transcribers to keep them abreast of news regarding software
changes, improvements and to give a FAQs section.
As for the volunteers working within each project or in both projects, I
would encourage them to volunteer for the task(s) where they feel they
could best contribute.
Lastly, someone needs to coordinate the process. It doesn't have to be
someone with an iron hand but it does need to be someone who thoroughly
understands every aspect of the process. It should not be a popularity
contest. This person either needs to be appointed or chosen from qualified
candidates.
Thank you for giving consideration to this proposal of a way to give
rebirth to the Census endeavor of the USGenWeb Project.
Tim
Corky Knebel
MtGenWeb Project State Coordinator
http://www.imt.net/~corkykn/montana.html