Hey Jack,
I re-read my post and I don't think I explained enough. We discussed
cemeteries on private property and cemeteries that are landlocked quite a
bit. Veterans buried in these cemeteries was just ONE of our points WHY it
important to access these cemeteries to restore, preserve, and show them the
respect they deserve.
If it is any consolation, Rep. Tom Saunders was upset to hear that a Rev.
War vet was buried in the almost non-existent Farley Cemetery.
Angela
----- Original Message -----
From: <Jackbriles(a)aol.com>
To: <INPCRP-L(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: [INPCRP] cemetery legislation??
In a message dated 3/27/03 11:27:33 PM Eastern Standard Time,
tielking(a)knightstown.net writes:
> Ruth,
> I am sorry. The meeting was tonight; and I did not get your o.k. in time
to
> include it. Veterans buried in pioneer cemeteries and landlocked
or
private
> property was discussed, though briefly.
> Angela Tielking
>
Angela,
I guess I was mistakenly believing that Ingress and Egress, at least
to
our Veterans in our cemeteries was almost at the top of the List.
May I
ask
what could be more important.? This has been the biggest problem in
the
Southern part of the state. What was the top subject discussed at the
meeting
as to possible Legislation.?
Or were there any Possible New Laws discussed.? We all need to know what
to
expect to work toward. We have all went into a slump. Are we afraid
of
being
rejected.? I just want to know what to expect, as I am sure others
do
also.
We need motivation. So far you are it. God Bless, Sincerely,
jackbriles(a)aol.com
Jack E. Briles, Sr
Floyd Co. PCRP Coordinator
PO Box 444 New Albany, In. 47151-0444
(8120 282-6585
==== INPCRP Mailing List ====
If we cannot respect the dead, how can we respect the living?