Beginning March 2nd, 2020 the Mailing Lists functionality on RootsWeb will be discontinued. Users will no longer be able to send outgoing emails or accept incoming emails. Additionally, administration tools will no longer be available to list administrators and mailing lists will be put into an archival state.
Administrators may save the emails in their list prior to March 2nd. After that, mailing list archives will remain available and searchable on RootsWeb
Just received this and I assume this is accurate.
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 6:08 PM
Subject: HR-10 - Will restrict our access to county and state birth records
> Hello, fellow researchers,
> I've recently learned of a bill moving swiftly through the U. S.
> House of Representatives that would severely restrict our access to birth
> records, even those kept by counties and states, in the name of
> "security." We genealogists (and any other citizens) would have access
> only if we are the "registrant" (it's our own record), or are named in the
> document. If we don't meet those criteria, we would have to meet "minimum
> standards for issuance of a birth certificate to specific family members,
> their authorized representatives, and others who demonstrate that the
> certificate is needed for the protection of the requestor's personal or
> property rights."
> You might be interested in reading the actual language of this
> bill. It can be found at http://thomas.loc.gov./ Put in the number of the
> bill (HR10) on the home page, where it says "Bill Number." Once on the
> page where the bill starts, find the part about birth records using "Find
> on this page."
> It is my understanding that David Rencher, Chairman of the Record
> Access and Preservation Committee, a joint committee of the National
> Genealogical Society and Federation of Genealogical Societies (FGS), has
> sent a letter to the bill's sponsor, Congressman Dennis Hastert,
> recommending an amendment to the bill as follows:
> "However, nothing in this Chapter 2 shall be construed to require a State
> to change its law with respect to public access to (A) non-certified
> copies of birth certificates, or to (B) birth certificates or birth
> records once a period of 100 years has elapsed from the date of creation
> of the certificate or record."
> A copy of the entire letter is available on the FGS site at
> Because this bill is moving toward passage so quickly, it is urged
> that the genealogical community take action immediately and let their
> representatives know that they are in support of David Rencher's proposed
> amendment and the FGS position in this important matter. To find your
> state representative's contact information, go to:
> ==== MOCLARK Mailing List ====
> MISSOURI STATE PARKS AND HISTORIC SITES
I am looking for any information on Ezra L. Fowler, bn 1842, OH, and wife,
Mary Ann (Hayward) Fowler, bn 1844, Ohio.
They were in Poweshiek, Co, IA in 1872 thru 1875, according to the birth of
3 of their children born in Iowa.
George A. Fowler, bn 1868, MO
Edward T. Fowler, bn 1870, MO
Ezra Lonzo Fowler,Jr., bn 1872, IA
David Albert Fowler, bn 1874, IA
Andrew Jackson Fowler, bn 1875, IA
Robert William Fowler, bn 1877, Mich
Mamie May Fowler, bn 1878, Mich
Charles Sumner Fowler, bn 1881, Mich
Perhaps someone will have some info on this family. I have reason to
believe they went to Iowa because Ezra might have had Fowler kin in Iowa.
Darline Fowler Smith
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.3.0 - Release Date: 11/13/2004
Welcome to the IAPOWESH mailing list!!
PLEASE SAVE THIS INFORMATION so you have it for future reference.
PLEASE BE CONSIDERATE of your fellow list members. Some folks are beginners at computers and some to genealogy. The world is a better place when we are all patient with each other. Personal attacks, criticism, or flaming are never permitted.
HOW DO YOU POST? Send an email to email@example.com
WHAT SHOULD YOU POST?
1. Questions about your ancestors. Give as much detail as you can.
2. Interesting history that is relevant to the list.
3. Genealogy and family history conferences, even if they charge for admission.
4. Genealogy societies should feel free to post about their society and their websites.
5. Book reviews of genealogy books are reasonable to post. A list of books is not, but sharing a good genealogy book you've found is a good idea.
6. Links to personal blogs that are about genealogy. They can be your blog or another. Even if the blog has ads, that is not a problem.
7. New collections on various genealogy sites that are relevant. We don't want advertisements, but if you find an interesting collection on Ancestry, FamilySearch, Library of Congress, or some other site that has relevance to the list, let people know.
WHAT SHOULD BE IN YOUR POST?
1. An informative but concise subject line.
2. When replying to a previous message, be sure to check that the intended recipient's address is showing in the Send To box of your email BEFORE clicking on SEND.
3. Proofread and be sure you want your post public. All posts go in the archives!
WANT TO UNSUBSCRIBE?
Send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org and put unsubscribe in the subject and body and nothing else.