I move that we move on and put the article to a vote.
A hand to each of us and a pat on the back to all.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jacki Jonas" <genealogy(a)jackijonas.com>
To: <GAGENWEB-L(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2005 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: [BY-LAWS] RA Responsibilities
Haven't heard no objections to the slight change in wording, I've made the
change to the proposals page. Anything further? If not, could I entertain a
motion that the proposed Articles 3, 4 and Policies and Procedures as
posted on the proposals page be presented to the CCs for a vote? I would
propose setting the vote up so that the CCs could respond with a) accept,
b) reject, return to committee, c) no opinion for Article 3, for Article 4,
and for each numbered section of the P&P.
Jacki
At 09:18 AM 8/29/2005, you wrote:
I will go for that wording. Or I will support it I know I dont have a
vote
on it in committee but I will vote for it when the time comes.
Every one of you have done a fantastic job working on these Bylaws and I
thank you!!
Ed Gordon
>From: Jacki Jonas <genealogy(a)jackijonas.com>
>Reply-To: GAGENWEB-L(a)rootsweb.com
>To: GAGENWEB-L(a)rootsweb.com
>Subject: Re: [BY-LAWS] RA Responsibilities
>Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:13:07 -0400
From Vivian:
>
>>2. Maybe we could change the wording a bit. "The SC and ASC will be
>>responsible for having the vote counted."
>
>Sounds like a reasonable substitution to me. Allows for either the SC and
>ASC to count the votes (for RA) themselves, or involve a non-interested
>party.
>
>What do the rest of you think?
>
>Jacki
>
>