An *either/or* is what I meant to say.
Vivian
At 03:40 PM 3/2/2005 -0500, you wrote:
I think an and/or statement might be the solution. We can bring it up
during the CC comment phase.
Vivian
At 05:11 PM 2/28/2005 -0500, you wrote:
>O.K. by me to present to the CC's at this point. I still think the queries
>item with a site-wide search feature (like freefind) should be a suitable
>replacement for the Surname Registry. The rest sounds good to me.
>
>Barbara
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jacki Jonas [mailto:genealogy@jackijonas.com]
>Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 4:52 PM
>To: GAGENWEB-L(a)rootsweb.com
>Subject: [BY-LAWS] Site requirements, final
>
>
>Ok, here's the current list, slightly revised to reflect recent postings:
>
>~ National logo, linked to USGenWeb main page (*logo required by national)
>~ State logo, linked to The GAGenWeb Project main page (*link required by
>national)
>~ Queries (*required by national)
>~ Basic resources info (*required by national)
>~ Updated and links checked quarterly
>~ Surname registry
>~ Individual links to neighboring counties
>~ Link to county mailing list
>~ Link to county archives
>~ Brief history of the county
>~ Connect to "About GenWeb" ***
>~ County Table
>~ Search engine
>
>*** Still no clarification here - would this be the About USGenWeb or About
>GAGenWeb?
>
>Did I get everything?
>
>If there are no objections or changes by Wednesday, Mar. 2, I will consider
>this list approved for presentation to the CCs for comments.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Jacki