So -- is it ok to adjust the site requirements to the list as broken down
into required and suggested?
Anything else that needs tending to in either Article 3, Article 4, or the
P&P? Or are they ok to present to the CCs for final comments and then
voting maybe at the end of August, beginning of September?
Thanks,
Jacki
I think we have it fairly well nailed down.
Deborah
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jacki Jonas" <genealogy(a)jackijonas.com>
To: <GAGENWEB-L(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 9:28 PM
Subject: Re: [BY-LAWS] Site requirements/suggestions
So -- is it ok to adjust the site requirements to the list as broken down
into required and suggested?
Anything else that needs tending to in either Article 3, Article 4, or the
P&P? Or are they ok to present to the CCs for final comments and then
voting maybe at the end of August, beginning of September?
Thanks,
Jacki