I believe most of the pages that had a name attached to them when I
inherited them, are still that way and I personally believe they should be
unless the person request that their name be taken off. Nancy
At 10:07 AM 03/27/2004, you wrote:
In one of the responses from a CC, there was a question about the use
of
the "copyright" on the County Pages.
I"m not sure this has ever really been defined, and perhaps we could get
some feedback here.
The question raised was if a CC gives the page to another CC, is it proper
for the copyright for those previous years to be "assumed" by the new CC.
Or would it be better to retain the CC's name and copyright for those
earlier years.
"Copyright 1996-2001 by Jane Jones
Copyright 2001-2004 by Jerry Smith
Do you think this would be a better way to state this? It would then give
a record of the county from it's origin to the present day
Coordinator. OR does it really matter?
Additionally back in 2002.... CAT has some suggestions...in which she felt
the content belonged to USGenWeb but the design should be the CCs --- and
that new CCs should not assume the "graphics" without proper permission
from the creator of the graphics themselved.
This resulted in some unresolved dialogue about who does own the content,
and if the CC must "leave" the work that they did themselves. That is an
issue in itself--and not what is meant here!
I wanted to clarify that the "copyright notice" in the "page
requirements"
is not about who owns the content of the page, but just the statement of
the "copyright".
==== GAGEN Mailing List ====
Genealogy research usually begins with our great-grandparents to preserve
the privacy of 'living persons'. If you encounter a person searching
their birth parents, the need to go to the area on the web that deals
with just this type of research. Please refer them to:
http://www.adoption.org
Nancy Gay Crawford
MeMeC(a)alltel.net
************************
Always try to be Fair, Honest and Kind.