I am feeling slightly frustrated here because this sounds a potentially
important issue and yet - unless I've missed it - we don't know what the
event type is, what the relationship of the person on the other end is
(i.e. the one with the event type) to the unborn person - and crucially,
we don't know the exact values of the dates for this allegedly odd event
and the birth of the unborn person.
Personally, I don't see anything wrong per se with a timeline event
before birth - it's a timeline, not a life history. But the important
thing is the detail. Can we have that detail?
On 16/03/2015 11:31, Greenbee via wrote:
... The timeline is a really good idea, just poorly implemented.
Another black mark for v6. If no one will fix it.
Jane has told me how to fix timeline events that happened after death, but
at least one of my records has a timeline event 8 years BEFORE his birth.
This surely has to be an error. ....