Beginning March 2nd, 2020 the Mailing Lists functionality on RootsWeb will be discontinued. Users will no longer be able to send outgoing emails or accept incoming emails. Additionally, administration tools will no longer be available to list administrators and mailing lists will be put into an archival state.
Administrators may save the emails in their list prior to March 2nd. After that, mailing list archives will remain available and searchable on RootsWeb
Hi All, well after reading the message from you all saying 1901 census
site was up and running, I decided to give it a whirl, pleased I did, I
went on at 9pm Friday night, and by 10:30, I had searched, found, paid
for, and downloaded 7 images, superb images at that, all for £5.25p,
Cant be bad. Only problems I encountered were frequent messages telling
me my session had timed out, after only a minute or so. But on searching
again it worked. Also, after saving the image to my hard drive, the
viewer sometimes froze, and had to be terminated with the dreaded ctl
alt del combo. None the less, I am impressed...at least it works. Sorry
it has nothing to do with FH, apart from me now being able to fill in a
few more gaps:-) but thought I would share that with you.
Regards,
Dave Pacey
-----Original Message-----
From: Geoff Lowe [mailto:Gpclowe@btopenworld.com]
Sent: 29 August 2002 23:00
To: FAMILY-HISTORIAN-USERS-L(a)rootsweb.com
Subject: Re: [FHU] 1901 Census
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Goff" <peter.goff(a)btinternet.com>
> Its only on line 0900 hrs - 1900 hrs Monday to Friday, but at least
it works.
It actually works outside that time too; it just seems more difficult to
open an account outside the official opening hours.
Geoffers
Charlbury, Oxfordshire
Its only on line 0900 hrs - 1900 hrs Monday to Friday, but at least it
works.
Peter Goff
Kingsclere, Hampshire, UK
www.langdon-goff.org.uk
All outgoing e-mails are scanned for viruses
There are no attachments to this message
Simon,
I have been using Family Historian now for over 2 months as my primary
Genealogy program and must say that I have found it to be *_superb_*.
I do have a few items that I would like to add to the "Wish List" for
future developments - mainly things that will make FH easier to use:
1) Property Dialog for Individuals: can you have an option to always
open this out in the fully expanded state (spouse and children) every
time, including Source details. I always work in this mode and find the
extra button clicks a little inconvenient (perhaps this should be
remembered from the last session?)
2) Individual Records window: can you make the search for individuals
"incremental" - that is to say that the selection will continue to be
refined if you type a series of characters, rather than simply move to
the first instance of the character.
3) Can you always offer the "families" and "multimedia" tabs on the
records window - rather than having to select these from the main menu.
4) Can you offer a tool to capitalise surnames automatically - I like
the convention of capitalised surnames, but if I import GEDCOM files I
sometimes have to laboriously capitalise these.
5) I would love to see a diagram where the reliability of data can be
assessed at a glance (hence helping to plan future researches). What I
have in mind is a diagram where the source status ("primary evidence,
Secondary evidence, Questionable and Unreliable") associated with a
particular Fact (e.g. "whole record, birth, death" etc) would provide a
diagram with the individuals' boxes highlighted in different colours
based on the status (e.g. green, amber, yellow, red?). At a glance I
could assess the strength of the data!
6) I would love to see the multimedia properties to be able to display
the content of *.rtf, *.doc, *.pdf files which are associated with
multimedia records (e.g. by using OLE or by launching the appropriate
application on double-click).
7) I would love the capability of saving diagrams to a document type
(e.g. .pdf, .jpeg or .tif). On a couple of occasions I have wanted to
share my researches with friends and found that my only solution was to
print out a hard copy. In the future I would like to put some diagram up
on a web site.
For anyone who reads this and is considering using FH, these are my top
ten reasons why I like this software:
1) It does seem to be 100% GEDCOM compatible - as this is the dominant
standard then I think it is most likely to be future-proof
2) Its capability of merging GEDCOM data sources is absolutely awesome
and under complete user control
3) Its diagramming facilities are the best I have ever seen - I
especially love the capability of linking photos and the way in which
the diagrams are "interactive", i.e. you can add or delete individuals
within the diagram.
4) It is very fast
5) The query capabilities are superb
6) The display of all elements of a record and associated links in a
grid structure (see the individual properties dialog and choose the
"all" tab), which can be "drilled into" offers complete access to all
the facts in the system at a glance
7) Automatic Source Citation is a real boon - few genealogy applications
assist source references in the way that FH does, yet it is widely known
that a family history is only as good as the sources provided
8) The manual written in the form of a tutorial rather than a features
list got me up and running quickly (although it is essential that the
new user goes through tutorial as FH is less than intuitive for users
more accustomed to applications like Family Tree Maker)
9) It is very stable (I am running windows XP)
10) The on-line discussion group offers a good environment for feedback
and suggests that the authors are open to ideas and meeting the needs of
users
Apart from the suggestions above I do suggest that new users are aware
that:
1) The power of FH does lead to a greater learning curve than some of
the other applications on the market - if you don't make the investment
of some time to learn how to use the software, then you may find it hard
going!
2) FH more probably suits people with a reasonable level of confidence
in computing as some areas (such as creating new queries) are more akin
to a data analysis paradigm than a document/reporting approach
3) The reporting capabilities are fairly poor - with standard
individual, family reports etc being absent. This is being addressed in
a free upgrade to all users, but if you must have this capability today
then just be aware that it isn't there yet!
Being in the software application business myself I can appreciate the
work involved in creating FH and the elegance of the solution provided.
Congratulations.
Niall Enright
--------------------------------------------
Niall Enright
Group Director
Enviros Software Solutions
Telegraphic House
Salford Quays
Manchester M50 3XW
UK
Tel: +44 (0) 161 874 3611
Fax: +44 (0) 161 848 0181
Mob: +44 (0) 7976 263 716
Email: Niall.Enright(a)Enviros.com
Web: www.enviros.com/montage
--------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: John Hanson [mailto:john.hanson@one-name.org]
Sent: 29 August 2002 06:36
To: FAMILY-HISTORIAN-USERS-L(a)rootsweb.com
Subject: [FHU] Problem with queries
Simon
I have set up a query to try and find from my file all of those people
that should be alive in 1901. This includes the names of the spouses as
well. I have a question.
1 I have included a line in the query to exclude people who died
before 1901
(It doesn't seem worth looking for them) but there are still some
included. The query specifies only the year and not an exact date These
appear to be people where the date shows as something like "before 1881"
which obviously means that I have found the family on the 1881 census
and the persons spouse was shown as a widow(er). Is this a problem with
the program??
Regards
John Hanson
Member of the Society of Genealogists (www.sog.org.uk)
Member of the Guild of One Name Studies (www.one-name.org)
==============================
To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy
records, go to:
http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237
Peter Bolsom asked
>> How do I remove an unwanted file name from the drop down list of the 4
most
recently opened files that you get when you open File ?
These work the same way in many Windows applications (e.g. most versions of
Microsoft Word). They simply list the last 4 files you opened. If you open
a file using the File>Open command it should move to the top of the list (if
not already there), and the remaining files should then move down, and the
4th should drop off the end. So you can use File>Open to open 4 different
files you want to use. Actually, you're not usually suppose to worry which
4 files are listed there. Its just intended to be for convenience.
Geoff Lowe said (about family tree diagrams)
>> I'd like to be
able to have a basic tree of names and then add individual bits of
information such as dates of birth, marriage, burial, etc; the present
format is a bit restrictive..
You can define your own "text schemes", Geoff, which will allow you to
display whatever information you want in diagrams. You can have just names,
or any of the other items of information you mention (or, any other items of
information you have in your file, for that matter), appearing the boxes in
diagrams. Family Historian is very flexible about how you define what can
appear in boxes (plus it comes with quite a few 'standard' text schemes that
you can use). Have a look at the User Manual: especially the section on
"Text Schemes" (p. 35 of Chapter 3) and the section "Create Text Schemes"
(p. 65 of Chapter 7).
Brian Teece wrote
>> Can you please advise me on the correct use of -
1 RESI
1 WILL
1 CENS @...@
FH is rejecting these as invalid lines.
I've talked about the CENS tag in another mail. RESI and WILL should be
valid in the context of an Individual record, but not elsewhere. If they're
being rejected, its probably because they're being used invalidly in these
contexts. Could you email me a short sample (including the full record -
i.e. the line that starts with a 0) so that I can see the context of use,
and work out what the problem is? Also, which version of Pedigree produced
this? And what version of GEDCOM does it generate? 5.5?
Brian Teece wrote
> I've been trying to transfer source and census information across from
> Pedigree but FH rejects the coding, a sample of which is given below. I'd
be
> grateful if you could explain where the errors are and what needs to be
done
> to make it acceptable to FH.
> I appreciate that the census data is using cusom tags - will FH accept
these
> if they are changed in some way, or is there another way around the
problem?
>
> Kind regards,
> Brian Teece
>
> 0 @I2547@ INDI
> 1 BIRT
> 2 SOUR @11@
> 0 @11@ SOUR
> 1 NOTE Parish Register & IGI
>
> 0 @I5551@ INDI
> 1 CENS @295@
> 0 @295@ CENS
> 1 CNUM 300
> 1 CYEA 1881
> 1 CADD Cobridge Rd,Shelton,Hanley
> 1 CPER TEECE Harriet Head W 67 Broseley
> 1814
> 2 CONT TEECE Benjamin Son U 47 Stone Miner Broseley
> 1834
> 2 CONT TEECE George H. GSon 16 App.in Pottery Hanley
> 1865
Brian, the census stuff that Pedigree is not valid GEDCOM. The line "0
@295@ CENS" defines a record of type 'CENS'. There is no such record in
GEDCOM (not in GEDCOM 5.5 at any rate, which has been the standard for about
7 years now). Nor does GEDCOM contain any provision for defining your own
record types. If you want to try to recover this information, the best
thing would be to try to find someone with a later version of Pedigree that
does a better job of exporting the data. Failing that, you could try
editing the GEDCOM file directly and converting all your Census records into
Note records. If you want to do this, as always, please make sure that you
*backup* all files involved before you try any of this out, and check the
results very carefully before starting to make use of a file that you've
edited in this way! (and, again, this is all at your own risk if you do it).
To edit the GEDCOM file to convert CENS records to NOTE records, you would
first have to find all occurrences of lines that look like
0 @295@ CENS
and change them to
0 @295@ NOTE
The number between the @ chars must remain unchanged, in each case. This is
a little tricky. You could search for all occurrences of "@ CENS" and
replace this with "@ NOTE", but you would need to check that "@ CENS" never
occurred in a different type of context. Alternatively, if you want to,
Microsoft Word and other editors allow you to use "Wildcards" (sometimes
also called regular expressions), which would make it possible to do the
search and replace in a single pass (not easy unless you're already familiar
with using Wildcards), specifying something effectively like this: Find me a
line beginning with "0 @" followed by any text, followed by "@ CENS"; and
then keep it all the same but replace the final CENS with NOTE (In Word 97,
open the Replace dialog, click 'Wild cards', set Find What to "(^l0
\@[0-9]@\@) CENS" without the quotes and set Replace to "\1 NOTE", without
the quotes. Experiment with this yourself, to make sure it does what it
should, before you rely on it!).
Having done that you would then want to find all occurrences of lines
containing "1 CENS @295@" (or something other record number other than 295)
and replace them with lines containing "1 NOTE @295@". Again, you could do
this by searching for 1 CENS @" and replacing it with "1 NOTE @" as long as
you were sure that the search text did not occur in the wrong context
anywhere.
That should take you forward a bit, but you would find that your new Note
records contained no text, and had lots of 'star-burst' fields (unrecognised
fields that F.H. has loaded and treats as text, but doesn't actually know
what the fields are supposed to be used for) in them with the Census info.
CNUM, CYEA, CADD and CPER and for example, are not valid GEDCOM. You could
use this data to manually edit the census records over time, to move the
data into the text portion of the note. Alternatively, when you do the
conversion, you could if you wanted to try changing this at that point.
e.g. when you edited the GEDCOM file you could change
0 @295@ CENS
1 CNUM 300
1 CYEA 1881
to
0 @295 NOTE Census - 300 - 1881
or something similar. You could experiment with a sample file, perhaps, and
see what works best in practice.
Good luck.
Simon Orde
List Administrator and Family Historian designer
Simon
First just to say that Brian Teece has now kindly fixed my problem of
missing spaces in my Generations GEDCOM file. He replaced nearly 4000
instances of CONC with CONT so everything is now fine.
How do I remove an unwanted file name from the drop down list of the 4 most
recently opened files that you get when you open File ? I have deleted the
files themselves but the names remain and prevent me going straight to other
files.
Regards
Peter
Geoffers,
Highlight the source on the sources tab, then, on the on the view menu,
select "Record Links"
That will list every record linked to that source. All you have to do
then is select your record from the rsulting window.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Dave Pacey
-----Original Message-----8< snip
Being a new user of FH, I may not yet have found the function; but if it
doesn't exist, I'd like to be able to open a source and then show what
individual records are connected to it. E.G a census return with several
members of a household would be linked to several individual records,
I'd like to be able to access any of those records directly from the
source.
However, for a new programme I'd give it a mark of 9 out of 10.
Geoffers
Charlbury, Oxfordshire
______________________________
Simon
I had 2 very kind offers ( from Brian Teece and from Jackie in
Kidderminster ) to run my GEDCOM file through Generations 8.0, and it worked
!
The notes now appear in the right place, which is brilliant. The only
slight defect is that quite a few of the spaces between words are missing,
but that doesn't really matter too much.
Once again thanks for your help and support.
Regards
Peter
Cumbria.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Partridge" <mjp(a)dsl.pipex.com>
[The one area that puzzles me, however, is the correct use of Notes
(as appearing in the Notes Tab on
the Record screen). How and where would this differ from a source?]
I think this is a case of using it to suit your own needs. I use it to
add things that I need to do, things that puzzle me - and for
individuals who I don't want to carry on with more detailed research,
I add a precis of what is known about them. In the sources notes, I
add the Custom ID of individuals mentioned in the source and if there
are any married women, add their maiden names - that sort of stuff.
I've had FH for just on a week and I like it. I like the display of
individual records and the switch through the various tabs. I like
being able to add sources independently of individual records and to
then attach them later. This layout is better than other programmes. I
have two projects, first a one-name study of my surname in Norfolk;
second a study of all data (i.e. all register, AT, BT, census,
subsidy, muster, manor records etc) relating to a single village in
Norfolk as part of a local history study.
I use Custodian II as well to store data and find it indispensable -
and if possible would really like updates of FH to move a little
towards Custodian in providing better analysis of sources.
Being a new user of FH, I may not yet have found the function; but if
it doesn't exist, I'd like to be able to open a source and then show
what individual records are connected to it. E.G a census return with
several members of a household would be linked to several individual
records, I'd like to be able to access any of those records directly
from the source.
Improvement in what can be done with family tree diagrams would be
welcomed with time and future upgrades, for example, I'd like to be
able to have a basic tree of names and then add individual bits of
information such as dates of birth, marriage, burial, etc; the present
format is a bit restrictive.. This was the one thing I liked about
Family Tree Maker (There wasn't much else to like about it).
However, for a new programme I'd give it a mark of 9 out of 10.
Geoffers
Charlbury, Oxfordshire
Simon,
>(5) Search for all occurrences of "1 NOTE". You will have to change each
of
these manually. They will be preceded by a line that starts with a 0.
e.g.<
Not if you use Word to do the replacements. (It won't work with Wordpad or
Notepad)
You FIND "NOTE^p1 " and leave the REPLACE box blank. "^p" represents the
end of line (carriage return) marker. You are removing NOTE from the first
line, the end of line marker and the 1 and space from the begining of the
second line.
And the rest of you who are faint hearted, Simon said it is not as
difficult as it looks. It isn't! Fifteen minutes at the very most to
change one GEDCOM file no matter how many people there are in it. And the
process is automatic - if you also use what I have suggested above as well
as what Simon has suggested. Three 'passes' through the file is all that
is required..
Jeanne Bunting née Attersley
I'm a relatively new user of FH and am just getting to the stage where I
can fully appreciate it's flexibility and power. The one area that puzzles
me, however, is the correct use of Notes (as appearing in the Notes Tab on
the Record screen). How and where would this differ from a source? Is it
intended simply as a place to note questions or areas to follow up etc. or
am I missing something really important here?
Overall it's a great program with many unique (or nearly so!) features. The
main draw back that I can see is the limited options for printing various
styles of trees and individual/ family reports - which are very useful for
sharing information with family members. Perhaps version 2.1 will rectify
this to some extent. In the meantime the answer seem to be to use FH to
create the gedcom file and then import it into another program where there
are more options to produce trees etc. The Diagrams are great though for
viewing records and it's in the area of creating and recording the basic
information that this program scores so highly. Simplicity itself! What
programs or Gedcom utilities do people find best for manipulating the file
produced by FH? Does anyone have any views on Tree Draw as an option?
Mike
_________________________
www.george-macdonald.comwww.digital-disciple.com
Simon
Many thanks for replying. I am afraid it all sounds beyond my capabilities,
and in any case I just want to get on with my family history researches.
Also I am not clear as to whether I would have to edit all of my 6000+ notes
individually. If so I couldn't even start to think about it !
Am I right in assuming that, as the fault lies with Generations 6.0, then
even your upgrade when it comes will not be able to deal with the problem ?
Which would leave me with the choice of buying Generations 8.0 in order to
use FH ( a rather expensive option ), or abandoning FH all together ( or at
least only using it for its charts ).
Regards
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: "Simon Orde" <SimonOrde(a)family-historian.co.uk>
To: <FAMILY-HISTORIAN-USERS-L(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 11:32 AM
Subject: [FHU] How to Fix GEDCOM Notes problems with Generations 6.0
> Peter Bolson mentioned the problem he has with Notes records generated by
> Generations version 6.0. He sent me an example of it. The problem in a
> nutshell is that this version of Generations is generating invalid and
> incorrect GEDCOM for Notes records. It appears that they fixed this bug
in
> later versions, but that doesn't help version 6.0 owners. The best
solution
> is to find someone who has a later version of Generations who can open
your
> Generations files and do the export for you. However, if you don't know
> anyone with a later version of Generations, here is an alternative
solution
> (not for the faint-hearted):
>
> The problem is sufficiently severe that the only way to solve it is to
edit
> the GEDCOM file itself directly. You can do this using a text editor such
> as Notepad or Wordpad. For the purposes of this example, you need a text
> editor which lets you do Search/Replace, which Wordpad does, and Notepad
> doesn't. So use Wordpad if you don't have anything better (Wordpad is a
> free accessory that comes with Windows). Bear in mind that GEDCOM files
are
> text files so you can use any text editor you want (as long as it can cope
> with the file size).
>
> Before trying this, here are 3 thoughts:
> (A) PLEASE make sure you make a backup copy of your file before you try
> changing it in a text editor!!!!
> (B) The instructions are fairly detailed, but on the whole make it seem
more
> complex than it is. However, its probably not worth attempting unless you
> are at least reasonably self-confident about it, know how to select
multiple
> lines in a text file, know what 'Cut', 'copy' and 'paste' mean, and can
make
> sense of the instructions!
> (C) This is all "at your own risk". If you make a mess of it, and haven't
> kept safe copies of your original files, please don't complain to me about
> it.
>
> Now, suppose you have a note record with text that reads: "I was born in
the
> year 1632, in the city of York, of a good family, though not of that
> country, my father being a foreigner of Bremen, who settled first at
Hull."
> When you save this to GEDCOM it should be saved in a format that looks
like
> this:
>
> 0 @N1@ NOTE I was born in the year 1632, in the city of York, of a good
> family, though not of that coun
> 1 CONC try, my father being a foreigner of Bremen, who settled first at
> Hull.
>
> GEDCOM lines always begin with a number. Records (e.g. Note records)
always
> start with a 0. Other lines have numbers that are bigger than 0. These
> lines are all parts of records. Long notes have to be split over several
> GEDCOM lines, because GEDCOM lines must not be longer than 255 characters
> (actually this particular note could fit onto one line, but I've split it
> over 2 to illustrate how that works).
>
> The problem is that Generations version 6.0 would not generate the correct
> GEDCOM. Instead it would produce something like the following for this
> note:
>
> 0 @N1@ NOTE
> 1 NOTE I was born in the year 1632, in the city of York, of a good family,
> though not of that coun
> 2 CONC try, my father being a foreigner of Bremen, who settled first at
> Hull.
>
> Which, in computing terms, is nothing like what it should be.
>
> So - what you need to do is this:
>
> *** Tips if you use Wordpad ***
> i) You will need to set the File type to 'All documents' in the File Open
> dialog, to see GEDCOM files.
> ii) Make sure you set the Wordwrap option to 'No wrap' (View/Options menu,
> then Text tab).
> iii) Create the New File as a "Text document" in Step (3).
> iv) When you save the file, make sure you save it as a "Text document"
> v) When searching for "1 NOTE" in step (5), press F3 to repeat the last
> search
> **************************
>
> (1) Locate the section of your file that contains the Note records. Note
> records (like all records) occur on lines that start with a 0. They are
> followed by an @ char, then a letter 'N', then a number, another @ char,
> then the word NOTE (e.g. 0 @N1@ NOTE). A Note record ends where the next
> record starts (ie. at the next line that starts with a 0).
> (2) Select all the lines that belong to Note records (all Note records
> should be grouped together) and use Cut to move them into the clipboard.
> Type a new line with just 3 asterisks in it, to show where the Note
records
> had been. Save the file.
> (3) Create a new file and paste the Note records into it.
> (4) In the new text file, use your editors Search and Replace facility to
> change all occurrences of the text "2 CONC" to "1 CONC" (use Match Case
for
> greater safety). Also similarly change all occurrences of "2 CONT" to "1
> CONT".
> (5) Search for all occurrences of "1 NOTE". You will have to change each
of
> these manually. They will be preceded by a line that starts with a 0.
e.g.
>
> 0 @N1@ NOTE
> 1 NOTE I was born in the year 1632, in the city of York, of a good family,
> though not of that coun
>
> You need to make these 2 lines into 1 line by deleting everying following
> the start of the word NOTE on the 1st line up to the start of the word
NOTE
> on the 2nd line. So that this example would become.
>
> 0 @N1@ NOTE I was born in the year 1632, in the city of York, of a good
> family, though not of that coun
>
> Theoretically doing this might mean that the new line was now over the 255
> character limit, if the 2nd line was exactly 255 characters long.
However,
> in practice Generations appears to keep its lines much shorter than that,
so
> I don't think this should be a problem.
>
> (6) finally, select all of the text in the new file. Copy it to the
> clipboard.
> (7) Re-open your original file. Locate the line with 3 asterisks and
delete
> that line.
> (8) Place your cursor at the start of the next line and click Paste.
> (9) Make sure that the line you used in (8) is still a separate line, and
> hasn't got appended to the end of a Note record line. If it has, add a
line
> break (use the Enter key) to put it back on a line of its own.
> (10) Save your changes.
> (11) Open the file in Family Historian and check it *very carefully* to
see
> if it now looks OK! Try looking at your Note records in the Property
Dialog
> to make sure that everything is exactly as it should be.
>
>
> Bearing in mind that you can use 'Replace All' to do all the replacements
in
> step (4) in one go, this shouldn't necessarily take as long as you might
> think. The longer bit is step (5) where you have to manually merge 2
lines
> for each note record. How long that would take would depend on how many
> Note records you have.
>
> Incidentally, if you don't have many Note records, and you happen to know
> that CONT and CONC only ever occur within Note records and nowhere else,
> then you could do steps (4) and (5) on the original file without ever
having
> to go to the trouble of first isolating the Note records by cutting and
> pasting them into another file.
>
> *** FINAL NOTE: this version of Generations also uses CONC incorrectly
> everywhere - which means that you will always lose a space character
> wherever you see a CONC, and 2 words will be fused together with no space
> between them. This is a less serious, but nevertheless very annoying
> problem. The GEDCOM spec says that you must never split a line (using
CONC)
> at a space character, and this version of Generations only ever splits
lines
> at space characters using CONC. If you wanted to, you could go some way
to
> solving this problem by modifying your search/replace in step (4) to
replace
> "2 CONC " with "1 CONC _" (there is one space after the CONC in each
case).
> This way, you will get an underscore character wherever you should have a
> space, making the missing space characters easier to locate later, and
> making the text easier to read.
>
> Good luck.
>
> Simon Orde
> List Administrator and Family Historian designer
>
>
>
>
> ==============================
> To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records,
go to:
> http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237
>
>
P.S. In the previous email there are several lines which should appear as a
single line, but which have been automatically split (by my email program)
over 2 lines. For example,
0 @N1@ NOTE I was born in the year 1632, in the city of York, of a good
family, though not of that coun
should be one GEDCOM line, and was originally written by me as one line, but
got split by the email program over 2. All the examples of GEDCOM lines are
like this. Whenever you see a GEDCOM line, bear in mind that it should
always start with a number (e.g. 0, 1, 2, etc) and mentally put it back onto
a single line as you read it. Sorry about that.
Simon Orde
List Administrator and Family Historian designer
Peter Bolson mentioned the problem he has with Notes records generated by
Generations version 6.0. He sent me an example of it. The problem in a
nutshell is that this version of Generations is generating invalid and
incorrect GEDCOM for Notes records. It appears that they fixed this bug in
later versions, but that doesn't help version 6.0 owners. The best solution
is to find someone who has a later version of Generations who can open your
Generations files and do the export for you. However, if you don't know
anyone with a later version of Generations, here is an alternative solution
(not for the faint-hearted):
The problem is sufficiently severe that the only way to solve it is to edit
the GEDCOM file itself directly. You can do this using a text editor such
as Notepad or Wordpad. For the purposes of this example, you need a text
editor which lets you do Search/Replace, which Wordpad does, and Notepad
doesn't. So use Wordpad if you don't have anything better (Wordpad is a
free accessory that comes with Windows). Bear in mind that GEDCOM files are
text files so you can use any text editor you want (as long as it can cope
with the file size).
Before trying this, here are 3 thoughts:
(A) PLEASE make sure you make a backup copy of your file before you try
changing it in a text editor!!!!
(B) The instructions are fairly detailed, but on the whole make it seem more
complex than it is. However, its probably not worth attempting unless you
are at least reasonably self-confident about it, know how to select multiple
lines in a text file, know what 'Cut', 'copy' and 'paste' mean, and can make
sense of the instructions!
(C) This is all "at your own risk". If you make a mess of it, and haven't
kept safe copies of your original files, please don't complain to me about
it.
Now, suppose you have a note record with text that reads: "I was born in the
year 1632, in the city of York, of a good family, though not of that
country, my father being a foreigner of Bremen, who settled first at Hull."
When you save this to GEDCOM it should be saved in a format that looks like
this:
0 @N1@ NOTE I was born in the year 1632, in the city of York, of a good
family, though not of that coun
1 CONC try, my father being a foreigner of Bremen, who settled first at
Hull.
GEDCOM lines always begin with a number. Records (e.g. Note records) always
start with a 0. Other lines have numbers that are bigger than 0. These
lines are all parts of records. Long notes have to be split over several
GEDCOM lines, because GEDCOM lines must not be longer than 255 characters
(actually this particular note could fit onto one line, but I've split it
over 2 to illustrate how that works).
The problem is that Generations version 6.0 would not generate the correct
GEDCOM. Instead it would produce something like the following for this
note:
0 @N1@ NOTE
1 NOTE I was born in the year 1632, in the city of York, of a good family,
though not of that coun
2 CONC try, my father being a foreigner of Bremen, who settled first at
Hull.
Which, in computing terms, is nothing like what it should be.
So - what you need to do is this:
*** Tips if you use Wordpad ***
i) You will need to set the File type to 'All documents' in the File Open
dialog, to see GEDCOM files.
ii) Make sure you set the Wordwrap option to 'No wrap' (View/Options menu,
then Text tab).
iii) Create the New File as a "Text document" in Step (3).
iv) When you save the file, make sure you save it as a "Text document"
v) When searching for "1 NOTE" in step (5), press F3 to repeat the last
search
**************************
(1) Locate the section of your file that contains the Note records. Note
records (like all records) occur on lines that start with a 0. They are
followed by an @ char, then a letter 'N', then a number, another @ char,
then the word NOTE (e.g. 0 @N1@ NOTE). A Note record ends where the next
record starts (ie. at the next line that starts with a 0).
(2) Select all the lines that belong to Note records (all Note records
should be grouped together) and use Cut to move them into the clipboard.
Type a new line with just 3 asterisks in it, to show where the Note records
had been. Save the file.
(3) Create a new file and paste the Note records into it.
(4) In the new text file, use your editors Search and Replace facility to
change all occurrences of the text "2 CONC" to "1 CONC" (use Match Case for
greater safety). Also similarly change all occurrences of "2 CONT" to "1
CONT".
(5) Search for all occurrences of "1 NOTE". You will have to change each of
these manually. They will be preceded by a line that starts with a 0. e.g.
0 @N1@ NOTE
1 NOTE I was born in the year 1632, in the city of York, of a good family,
though not of that coun
You need to make these 2 lines into 1 line by deleting everying following
the start of the word NOTE on the 1st line up to the start of the word NOTE
on the 2nd line. So that this example would become.
0 @N1@ NOTE I was born in the year 1632, in the city of York, of a good
family, though not of that coun
Theoretically doing this might mean that the new line was now over the 255
character limit, if the 2nd line was exactly 255 characters long. However,
in practice Generations appears to keep its lines much shorter than that, so
I don't think this should be a problem.
(6) finally, select all of the text in the new file. Copy it to the
clipboard.
(7) Re-open your original file. Locate the line with 3 asterisks and delete
that line.
(8) Place your cursor at the start of the next line and click Paste.
(9) Make sure that the line you used in (8) is still a separate line, and
hasn't got appended to the end of a Note record line. If it has, add a line
break (use the Enter key) to put it back on a line of its own.
(10) Save your changes.
(11) Open the file in Family Historian and check it *very carefully* to see
if it now looks OK! Try looking at your Note records in the Property Dialog
to make sure that everything is exactly as it should be.
Bearing in mind that you can use 'Replace All' to do all the replacements in
step (4) in one go, this shouldn't necessarily take as long as you might
think. The longer bit is step (5) where you have to manually merge 2 lines
for each note record. How long that would take would depend on how many
Note records you have.
Incidentally, if you don't have many Note records, and you happen to know
that CONT and CONC only ever occur within Note records and nowhere else,
then you could do steps (4) and (5) on the original file without ever having
to go to the trouble of first isolating the Note records by cutting and
pasting them into another file.
*** FINAL NOTE: this version of Generations also uses CONC incorrectly
everywhere - which means that you will always lose a space character
wherever you see a CONC, and 2 words will be fused together with no space
between them. This is a less serious, but nevertheless very annoying
problem. The GEDCOM spec says that you must never split a line (using CONC)
at a space character, and this version of Generations only ever splits lines
at space characters using CONC. If you wanted to, you could go some way to
solving this problem by modifying your search/replace in step (4) to replace
"2 CONC " with "1 CONC _" (there is one space after the CONC in each case).
This way, you will get an underscore character wherever you should have a
space, making the missing space characters easier to locate later, and
making the text easier to read.
Good luck.
Simon Orde
List Administrator and Family Historian designer
Lesley,
just a thought, but is your version of Acrobat Reader an old one? If its
any earlier than 5.0, I would recommend upgrading it to 5.0, which you can
do by following the usual installation instructions (see the ReadMe file, in
the Family Historian section of the Start\Programs menu).
Simon Orde
List Administrator and Family Historian designer
I picked up on FHU following a review in Family Tree Magazine (a
UK publication) and was intrigued by the 'Windows Explorer' type
format for displaying individual data - not to mention the reviewer's
enthusiasm for the 'charting' capabilities.
Despite the lack of 'reports' I decided to give it a go. I should
perhaps make the point here that previously I was a devotee
of Family Origins. Sad to say this piece of software appears to
have run its course and reading between the lines it seems that
the current owners may be more interested in pushing Family Tree
Maker - perhaps a case of buying-out the competition and letting it die a
slow death. So despite the knowledge that the original author of FO
is developing a new piece of software, I for one was on the lookout
for an alternative. As I have stated on a previous posting to this list, I
wouldn't
be without it now and I have tried all the main competitors from the Master
Genealogist through to Family Tree Maker.
If you have tried a sample of the available genealogy software programmes
on the market today you may agree with me that they appear to be merely
playing 'catch-up' with each other, with offerings which seem to be based
around tried and tested formats that lack very little innovation. The fact
is
though that most of these additions are purely cosmetic and when truth be
told, they are of little practical use to the average researcher. Lets be
honest,
how many times do we use the numerous reports that are now available in
these programmes?
What the genuine average family researcher has been crying out for
is a programme that is tailored to, and indeed addresses, his or her
fundamental research and data recording needs.
Being able to produce a time-line or a break-down of the average
number of children per family unit is hardly relevant when you are
sitting in an archive or library trying to find your kin, nor for that
matter
is it relevant when you get back home to sit down at your computer to
enter a day's findings on your system, not to mention when you come
to pass on your findings to a fellow researcher.
It seems to me that we, the family genealogists, have been dictated to
for far to long by 'market forces', to the determent of our practical needs.
Currently, FHU lacks some fundamental reports - Simone has put
his hands up to this omission and is in the process of rectifying the
position with the offer of a free upgrade - so no quibbles there.
Reports aside, I believe FHU already provides a fresh and long overdue
fresh approach to recording and displaying family data.
If I could be granted a say in development wishes, they would be to focus
his current annotative approach to genealogy software on putting himself
in the shoes of the average family researcher and asking 'how can I can
assist the family researcher to keep track of research in hand - i.e. those
chores we label under 'things-to-do-files' - and what about 'correspondence
by letter or email' not forgetting the sharp end with 'what printouts or
pro-formas' would best assist researchers when they go out to actual
archives or libraries'.
I've rattled on enough, so what do you think - are we to succumb to
'whizbangs
and bells', or should we be pushing for software formats that meet our
needs?
Doesn't FHU provide a ray of hope?
David Meredith
Nottingham, England
I'm interested in what software FH users switched from and why. I presently
use Legacy. My main interest in FH was its use of Gedcom directly (implying
that I could port my data to any other Gedcom capable software). I share my
data with a large ring of fellow researchers, all using different programs.
What other capabilities of the software are selling points?
Thanks,
Hi Phil
I was trying to print from the Acrobat help file, but I have now found out if I check the 'print as image' box it will work, although it prints a bit slower.
thanks
---- Original Message -----
From: "Lesley Arber" <l.arber(a)btinternet.com>
To: <FAMILY-HISTORIAN-USERS-L(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 10:31 PM
Subject: [FHU] (FH) Printing the manual
> Hello
>
> I'm a new user of the FH software and would like to print a hard copy of
the manual, but it will only print a series of minute boxes instead of the
correct font. I did try the export as text function, as well as selecting
all and copying straight to word, and although the text is there you lose
all the 'prettys'.
> Any ideas please.
> Lesley
Information
The Family Historian Users Mailing List is where Family Historian users can discuss aspects of the program
New and inexperienced users can post questions and ask advice, and experienced users of Family Historian can share their knowledge and give tips.
