My view aside, you are correct Charles.
For a state sponsored motion, it was at a minimum very dogerdly written at a
maximum terribly drafted.
The sponsoring state has outstanding writers as CCs.
They should have used some of them.
Terrible.
Don Kelly with thanks for your input. It might work better after all.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Barnum" <jcnreno(a)charter.net>
To: <cogen(a)rootsweb.com>; <COGEN-L(a)rootsweb.com>;
<AZGEN-L(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: [COGEN] Fwd: Announcement - Bylaw Amendment Proposal by
KSGenWeb
Donal,
All politics is bad and corrupt, but it's one of those universal evils.
I'd like to see only one SC Rep on the AB, One SP Rep, One RAL, and Four
CC Reps and one NC, of course.