Beginning March 2nd, 2020 the Mailing Lists functionality on RootsWeb will be discontinued. Users will no longer be able to send outgoing emails or accept incoming emails. Additionally, administration tools will no longer be available to list administrators and mailing lists will be put into an archival state.
Administrators may save the emails in their list prior to March 2nd. After that, mailing list archives will remain available and searchable on RootsWeb
This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list.
Author: CoddGenealogy
Surnames:
Classification: queries
Message Board URL:
http://boards.rootsweb.com/surnames.coddington/501/mb.ashx
Message Board Post:
Both the rootsweb DB for Descendants of Stockdale Coddington and the freepages website, which has sources, have been updated.
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~coddingtons/
added a google search tool and links to non North American and non-Stockdale lines.
Important Note:
The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.
This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list.
Author: cmcclonestar
Surnames:
Classification: queries
Message Board URL:
http://boards.rootsweb.com/surnames.coddington/223.4/mb.ashx
Message Board Post:
Contact me with updated information as I would consider participating in a D.N.A. test group. Regards, C.M.C.
Important Note:
The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.
This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list.
Author: CoddGenealogy
Surnames:
Classification: queries
Message Board URL:
http://boards.rootsweb.com/surnames.coddington/499/mb.ashx
Message Board Post:
Just a note that I have uploaded a new Stockdale Coddington gedcom to rootsweb (and therefore ancestry.com) this past January. It has all the additions and corrections everyone has been sending me since last year (1300 changes).
Note that I never list living people, so if your corrections included such information, I have it privately but don't display it publicly.
Also, if the source for your info didn't seem much better than the source I had for the conflicting information, it was entered as, e.g. alt birth date or alt name, or whatever.
The completely sourced version of the gedcom is at:
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~coddingtons/
but that is not an updated copy as it is 16,000 individual files that are a lot of work to upload correctly.
happy hunting
Jonathan
Important Note:
The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.
This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list.
Author: CoddGenealogy
Surnames:
Classification: queries
Message Board URL:
http://boards.rootsweb.com/surnames.coddington/498/mb.ashx
Message Board Post:
We just got some new DNA results from a man definitely descended from the Cheshire, England Coddingtons. Among other places, this line emigrated to Utah and Canada in the 19th century and has a sprinkling of descendants in the US and Canada.
The results are that the Cheshire haplotype is not convincingly similar to either the Lincolnshire or the Surrey (i.e. Stockdale Coddington) Coddingtons. All three family groups got the Coddington surname independently and are not related in any genealogically meaningful sense.
Note that Lincolnshire Coddingtons are probably the most numerous and certainly the most widespread, being in the US, Canada, UK, NZ and Australia. Not sure about the Cheshire clan, but at least UK Canada and USA, although not very numerous, as far as I know.
The Surrey branch gave rise to nearly all the Coddingtons in the USA, but never went anywhere else, and seems all but extinct in the UK. There about 10,000 Coddingtons in the USA, I think.
The Cheshire DNA results still need confirmation by testing a second man distantly related to the first, so if any of you know of someone who qualifies and would be interested, please let us know here or email me privately.
Another mystery solved!
Jonathan
Important Note:
The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.
This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list.
Author: CoddGenealogy
Surnames:
Classification: queries
Message Board URL:
http://boards.rootsweb.com/surnames.coddington/223.3.1/mb.ashx
Message Board Post:
Excellent!
Sorry to have missed this response until now. The test is not cheap, but we really need info on Irish Coddingtons.
Please email me at coddgenealogy(a)gmail.com to discuss this further.
Jonathan
Important Note:
The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.
This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list.
Author: CoddGenealogy
Surnames:
Classification: queries
Message Board URL:
http://boards.rootsweb.com/surnames.coddington/176.2/mb.ashx
Message Board Post:
Hello Cheryl,
I think WAC was married twice, though, as you say Livinia was the daughter of Hattie. It was WA's grandfather, Aaron C. who moved to Canada, and Aaron was a son of John 1778, who is a minor pest in Coddington genealogy because it is not clear from which of the Coddington diaspora from NJ he descends.
The line I established for WA is not bulletproof, by any means, but judging from US and Canadian public records, it is a pretty good hypothesis.
Jonathan
(see:
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~coddingtons/7651.htm
Important Note:
The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.