Beginning March 2nd, 2020 the Mailing Lists functionality on RootsWeb will be discontinued. Users will no longer be able to send outgoing emails or accept incoming emails. Additionally, administration tools will no longer be available to list administrators and mailing lists will be put into an archival state.
Administrators may save the emails in their list prior to March 2nd. After that, mailing list archives will remain available and searchable on RootsWeb
1..HI, is there anyone in Hopkinton, merrimack,NH that can check the
cemetary for a Celinda Mills grave. I think it is in the Old Cemetary.
would like to verify husband, family, dates, maybe maiden name.thanks
2. for Hopkinton again..Gilman Clough..Old Cemetary.. anything and
family there.
3..is there anyone in Lebana??New London Ct. (from old census and can't
read it)for a Annie Cora Kenyon..died Apr.15.1910 at the age of 52
(about).. need anything on that. (could be under the name of George
Strong??)
4... last one for Old Cemetary... Joesph Mills (d.1874)and Celinda
(d1880)(wife)
5.is there anyone in the Belchertown Ma. for Guernsey A. (Gurnsey)
Clough and wife of Mary Shabrook (looking for proof of wife maiden name)
only child I know of is William.. wife Cora Brown.anything on those.
6...Belchertown cemetary..Jonathan Clough and wife Almira
Levins...children James., Jefferson Moody Clough.,Henry,, Timothy,and
.and some more.. need to check. There is a Gurensy L. who is Williams
L.Clough son..who was he )guernsey married to?)thanks so much.. Judy
Hi Linda F.,
I don't know if this is the way to answer you, but I can't figure out how
to do it otherwise. I have John 2 that was first married to Jone (I have
Jane Sanders) as being married a second time to Martha CILLEY (SIBLEY). I
got her name from Page 99 of The Old Families of Salisbury and Amesbury,
Massachusetts which was written by David W. Hoyt. I have them married 15
January 1685/86. I have no children for them. I haven't finished the book
yet because I was reading it in the Library and it cannot be taken out.
If there is another way to answer you, please let me know the correct way.
Lucille J. Frost
EarthLink Revolves Around You.
> [Original Message]
> From: <MaizieRae(a)aol.com>
> To: <CLOUGH-GENEALOGY-L(a)rootsweb.com>
> Date: 4/9/2006 1:08:06 PM
> Subject: [CLOUGH-GEN] Re: Re: Correction: children of John: two Marthas
>
> In a message dated 4/9/2006 12:50:11 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> MaizieRae(a)aol.com writes:
>
> Martha, d. John and Martha, Mar. 17, 1691 (p. 51)
> John & Jone's children:
>
> Elizabeth, d. John and Jone, 16: 10 m: 1642 (p. 49)
> Mary, d. John and Jone, 30: 5 m: 1644 (p. 51)
> Sarah, d. John and Jone, 28: 4 m: 1646 (p. 52)
> John, s. John and Jone, 9: 1 m: 1648 (p. 50)
> Thomas, s. John and Jone, 29: 3 m: 1651 (p. 52)
> Martha, d. of John and Jone, 22; 1 m: 1654
> Samuell, s. John and Jone [Joannah. CT. R. 20: 12 m: 1656 ( p. 51).]
>
> John & Martha's child:
>
> Martha, d. John and Martha, Mar. 17, 1691 (p. 51)
>
> The above birth occurred after John 1 married Martha (nee BLAISDELL)
> CILLEY/SIBLEY who was born abt. 1640-1644, and before John 1 died.
Martha would
> have been about age 47-51 and certainly could have had a child at that
age. I
> don't know of any other John & Martha CLOUGH in Salisbury in 1691,
unless John
> 3 (John 2, John 1) married a second time to a Martha. Any ideas?
>
> Your cousin,
> Linda F.
>
>
>
> ==============================
> View and search Historical Newspapers. Read about your ancestors, find
> marriage announcements and more. Learn more:
> http://www.ancestry.com/s13969/rd.ashx
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 0.0.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.0/305 - Release Date: 4/8/2006
In a message dated 4/9/2006 12:50:11 PM Eastern Standard Time,
MaizieRae(a)aol.com writes:
Martha, d. John and Martha, Mar. 17, 1691 (p. 51)
John & Jone's children:
Elizabeth, d. John and Jone, 16: 10 m: 1642 (p. 49)
Mary, d. John and Jone, 30: 5 m: 1644 (p. 51)
Sarah, d. John and Jone, 28: 4 m: 1646 (p. 52)
John, s. John and Jone, 9: 1 m: 1648 (p. 50)
Thomas, s. John and Jone, 29: 3 m: 1651 (p. 52)
Martha, d. of John and Jone, 22; 1 m: 1654
Samuell, s. John and Jone [Joannah. CT. R. 20: 12 m: 1656 ( p. 51).]
John & Martha's child:
Martha, d. John and Martha, Mar. 17, 1691 (p. 51)
The above birth occurred after John 1 married Martha (nee BLAISDELL)
CILLEY/SIBLEY who was born abt. 1640-1644, and before John 1 died. Martha would
have been about age 47-51 and certainly could have had a child at that age. I
don't know of any other John & Martha CLOUGH in Salisbury in 1691, unless John
3 (John 2, John 1) married a second time to a Martha. Any ideas?
Your cousin,
Linda F.
In a message dated 4/9/2006 4:40:34 AM Eastern Standard Time,
dragonfly(a)atlantic.net writes:
I have found a bit of information.
the Jone is a legal name in the colonial times. I found it as Jone in
birth records in the middle and late 1600's New England in the NEHGS
listings.
maybe John Clough's wife really was Jone.
Dear Cousins,
I don't think John's wife's name ever was "Jane." It may be that in some
handwriting of "Jone" the "o" looked more like an "a." No where in the
Salisbury Vital Records is John's wife referred to as "Jane."
So far this is what I have found on Joannah / Jone (nee Unknown) CLOUGH,
wife of John 1:
"Jane" is only mentioned as Jone in the Salisbury, MA, vital records, and
only as Jone and Joannah in the court records, Essex County Quarterly Court.
Source: Deaths, heading "CLOUGH," "Vital Records of Salisbury,
Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849." Topsfield, MA: The Topsfield Historical
Society, 1915, pages 539-541.
John CLOUGH is mentioned with his wife Jone (not Jane) in the births of all
of his children, and both Jone and Joannah with the birth of Samuel, under
"Salisbury Births" (they are listed in the book noted above in alphabetical
order):
Elizabeth, d. John and Jone, 16: 10 m: 1642 (p. 49)
Mary, d. John and Jone, 30: 5 m: 1644 (p. 51)
Sarah, d. John and Jone, 28: 4 m: 1646 (p. 52)
John, s. John and Jone, 9: 1 m: 1648 (p. 50)
Thomas, s. John and Jone, 29: 3 m: 1651 (p. 52)
Martha, d. John and Jone, Mar. 17, 1691 (p. 51)
Samuell, s. John and Jone [Joannah. CT. R. 20: 12 m: 1656 ( p. 51).]
NOTE: CT. R.: court records, Essex Co. Quarterly Court mention both Jone
and Joannah).
Date of death. Salisbury, MA, death records list the entry "Jone, w John,
Sr d Jan 16 1679."
Source: Deaths, heading "CLOUGH," "Vital Records of Salisbury,
Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849." Topsfield, MA: The Topsfield Historical
Society, 1915, page 540.
It seems to me that "Jane" would not be a nickname for "Joannah," but
"Jone" most certainly would be. I believe we should be searching for a girl with
the birth name of "Joannah" with various spellings, not "Jane." Where did
the name "Jane" start surfacing in the first place? Anybody know?
Just my two cents worth,
Linda F.
I have found a bit of information.
the Jone is a legal name in the colonial times. I found it as Jone in
birth records in the middle and late 1600's New England in the NEHGS
listings.
maybe John Clough's wife really was Jone.
also... if a person died at 36 years, 11month and 4 days how old is
she?how do I figure the birth date?? I have a death record on this and I
don't know the birth day and year so I figured it could be found out by
this way. thanks Judy