Beginning March 2nd, 2020 the Mailing Lists functionality on RootsWeb will be discontinued. Users will no longer be able to send outgoing emails or accept incoming emails. Additionally, administration tools will no longer be available to list administrators and mailing lists will be put into an archival state.
Administrators may save the emails in their list prior to March 2nd. After that, mailing list archives will remain available and searchable on RootsWeb
It's a tag line on e-mail that originates at juno
At 02:27 AM 7/19/98 EDT, you wrote:
>So is somebody going to tell me why there was an advertisment for juno.com on
>that last e-mail? --Rocky
>
>
>==== CHAMBLEE Mailing List ====
>Chamlee & Chamblee Family Network
http://www.ornery.com/nauvoo/family/chamblee/index.html
>
>
DAStoddard,
I subscribed to the "James-L-request(a)rootsweb.com", and as I read the web
rules, I was struck by the fact, (unless I misinterpreted), that any info
you submit to that web is copyrighted automatically, by the web's owner,
and you are not allowed to resubmit that info to any other line, after
you have submitted it to the "James Web", and a few other restrictions,
re: copyright laws. So, I unsubscribed, because I think that is wrong.
George Leon Smith
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
works for me!
auto listism?
At 12:53 AM 7/18/98 -0400, you wrote:
>Now you should be able to hit "reply" and reply to the list by default.
>
>
>==== CHAMBLEE Mailing List ====
>Chamlee & Chamblee Family Network
http://www.ornery.com/nauvoo/family/chamblee/index.html
>
>
There are 242 files uploaded in the file for the family site.
Looking at Family Tree Maker CD liner notes in "NC/VA Marriages," they have
pages and pages of warnings about copyrights, citing "law" no less? They state
you fannot answer a research request on a bulletin board, i.e., tell people
when an ancestor was married. In fact, they say the purpose of the liner notes
is not to explain how to use the CD, but to explain copyright restrictions (19
pages worth)!
So, if you upload a gedcom full of info you have pulled off of their CD's
(which have alot of errors, btw, George Chamblee/Sarah Horton marriage not
even there) then you are violation of their copyright, even though they
solicited the gedcom for their site?
It further states Broderbund (FTM) is "serious" and "actively protects its
rights".
amusement for a Friday?
>
>I vote we change it because I'm a lazy person and won't remember the return
>address if I want everyone to see it.
>
I cannot find the option to change this, I'll have to ask around.
At one time it was not an option. I'll ask on the MSGen list
Mayhaps I called for a vote too soon?
Bobbe
I received an unsolicited membership application in the mail from the
Granville County Genealogical Society. No letter, not even a note, just the
application. There is an e-mail address listed, currin(a)gte.net, and I wrote
asking where they got my name and address and what precipitated the mailing.
The e-mail was returned as "user unknown." Weird, huh? I wonder if somebody
is selling a mailing list. Oh geez.
Rocky
At 09:25 PM 7/16/98 EDT, RockyIII(a)aol.com wrote:
>I notice that replies go to the individual and not back through the list. Is
>that really the way it is intended to be? Personally, I would love to see
all
>replies, but perhaps you did it this way for a good reason.
>
>Rocky Chamblee
You know, after persuing this genealogy habit for a while, I'm not sure I
want folks to know I'm a Chamblee Those Chamlees have more class anyway,
at least that's what I heard.
To respond to the list, hit the "reply to all", but this makes the original
sender get two replies, one from the list, and one personally to them.
I can set it up to automatically reply to the list, let's have a vote....
VOTE
Rocky's wanting to see "all the replies" is a good wish -- however, I
personally have replied directly to the sender (rather than the
rootsweb) because I needed to establish some "preliminary" info first --
perhaps we should all share the "preliminary info" anyway?????
Whaddayouthink?
Anne Barrett Chamlee
Well, I have never been able to get "reply to all" work on AOL yet with these
lists.
I vote we change it because I'm a lazy person and won't remember the return
address if I want everyone to see it.
I have a hard enough time remembering your names. So thanks, Laurie, for
allowing us this opportunity to flex our democratically solid ancestral
biceps.
I "thought" I forwarded this in the last blast to the list. I guess not
*************************
Well, on all the other lists I am on, you reply to the list..and if you don't
want anyone to see info, you reply in person.
I think it helps keeping the thread straight. Other people can also look at my
replies and say, "Oh, D'Ann's being sloppy again, she put in 1963 for Robert's
death date" and correct it.
However, it does have it's downsides, like people getting off topic, but Bobbe
will monitor that, she promised me.
Sometimes you do not want everyone to see the reply, but with a surname
organization that is usually the intent.
I notice that replies go to the individual and not back through the list. Is
that really the way it is intended to be? Personally, I would love to see all
replies, but perhaps you did it this way for a good reason.
Rocky Chamblee
Bonjour! (Hey, since so many people jump 6 generations to do their genealogy
and claim we are French, thought I'd just get you used to the mother tongue).
Since this list has not generally been announced yet and not on the Rootsweb
online master list as of this date, I'd thought I'd take this moment to
conduct a little business.
Because the e-mail & U.S. mailing list has gotten out of control (at least for
me), I am compiling a spreadsheet of cousins so I can actually remember who
they are when they e-mail me. Also, I know I have promised people things and
never delivered. Perhaps this will help. What would help is a vacation.
Anne, I am sure you have a separate list of U.S. Mail - Chamlee descendant
connections that you kept.
Think it would be tragic if anything happened to any one of us and record of
how to contact these people was lost. I've done this in Excel because I wanted
to be able to sort the fields effortlessly. The fields (columns of info are):
Lineage
Last Name
First Name
Street Name
City
State
Zip
Phone
E-mail address
URL or notes
Date of Initial contact
As you know I began hounding these people a LONG time ago for this info. So,
if anything should ever happen to me, know this master list exists. I think it
will be helpful to Bobbe as she monitors the list. She can see if new people
are hittin' it.
Once I figure I have gone with it as far as I can compiling, I'll send it out
to the core slaves. I'm sure Jack will need it for book announcement. Already
up to 150 names (including Anne's 5,000,000 she has that are just U.S. Mail
contacts).
It's finally heatin' up here, so we join the rest of the country in the Long
Hot Tennessee William's Summer.
La Ms D'Ann
PS: Carla, did you subscribe to this YET?
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------7F7D319152D
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Anyone know anything . . . ?
--------------7F7D319152D
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Return-Path: <POPEYEBUZZ(a)aol.com>
Received: from imo22.mx.aol.com (imo22.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.66])
by atl1.america.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA01119
for <chamlee(a)accucomm.net>; Wed, 15 Jul 1998 09:41:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: POPEYEBUZZ(a)aol.com
Received: from POPEYEBUZZ(a)aol.com
by imo22.mx.aol.com (IMOv14_b1.1) id NJZBa22301
for <chamlee(a)accucomm.net>; Wed, 15 Jul 1998 09:40:43 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <59602287.35acb15d(a)aol.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 09:40:43 EDT
To: chamlee(a)accucomm.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: HELLO
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 for Windows 95 sub 49
I AM LOOKING FOR A LADY WITH THE LAST NAME CHAMBLEE. SHE WAS BORN 8--31--37,
CHILDRESS, TEXAS. AT THE TIME SHE ALREADY HAD TWO CHILDREN [1957] IF YOU KNOW
HER PLEASE EMAIL ME THANK YOU POPEYEBUZZAOL.COM
--------------7F7D319152D--
In a message dated 7/15/1998 10:11:38 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
chamlee(a)accucomm.net writes:
<< I AM LOOKING FOR A LADY WITH THE LAST NAME CHAMBLEE. SHE WAS BORN
8--31--37, CHILDRESS, TEXAS. AT THE TIME SHE ALREADY HAD TWO CHILDREN [1957]
IF YOU KNOW HER PLEASE EMAIL ME THANK YOU POPEYEBUZZAOL.COM >>
1957 is very recent.....I only know dead people. I think it accounts for why I
am quite deadly at times.
--D