Howdy Mick
Yes am aware that things do not tie up correctly but then Jann is working
through information supplied to her via Dennis and Barbara Catley and as you
know I am sure, things get distorted when working 2nd 3rd 4th hand
information and it seems quite right and proper to me that between the three
parties, you can put matters straight.
I think it is a question of miscommunication rather than misinformation.
Nodoubt Dennis and Jann will pick up on your input and get the full picture
from you and I was wrong to infer that there was a connection between the
Tisbury Catley/Cadley line and the Catleys from Somerset.
Regards Tim C
----- Original Message -----
From: Mick Catley <catleym(a)netspeed.com.au>
To: <catley(a)rootsweb.com>; <catley(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: [CATLEY] contact.
G'day Tim,
I have not seen the information you have exchanged with Jann but your
commentary on the move of the Catleys from Barley to Bristol does not
accord with the records that I have. The earliest Hertfordshire
Catleys I have are the family of James and Alice (not Ann ) and while
their marriage has been estimated by at least one person, I know of,
as 1709, neither the venue nor the date has been verified by any
records that I am aware of.
My records suggest the migration to Tisbury, Wiltshire occurred with
James Catley (c. 7 Nov 1740, Barkway, Hertfordshire) and his wife,
Martha. James was the grandson of James and Alice and the son of
Charles Catley and Mary Newman.
I noted that Dennis Catley traces his line which includes William
Aubrey Catley back to James of Chilcompton, b. 1757 although thanks
to Phil Clements he goes back to Midsomer Welton. Phil's records for
the Midsomer Norton Catleys predates both the Tisbury and
Hertfordshire Catleys with Thomas (b. 1701 Midsomer Norton, Somerset)
son of Thomas Catley and Grace.
I am not aware of any linkage between the Wiltshire and Somerset Catleys.
I would be interested in comparing my records with Jann's if she is
prepared to exchange her information with me.
At 08:42 AM 23/08/2006, Tim Cattley wrote:
>Hello again Jann,
>
>OK I have it, thanks to your private attachment and I now am "with it" in
as
>much as your Catley Roots start in the Hertfordshire village of
Barley
circa
>1709 when James Catley married Ann.
>
>As Mick Catley intimates, this beginning of what has become a major
Cat*ley
>Tree seemed to migrate to an adjacent village, namely Barkway and
a
>generation later to a slightly larger Hertfordshire village by the name
of
>Anstey. Most of the enlargement of this Tree over the next 200
years or
so
>seemingly took place from Anstey and thus, rightly or wrongly,
this
overall
>Tree is now referred to in our genealogical terms as "The
Anstey
Cat*leys".
>
>However in your case, it looks as if your Charles' sub branch was an
early
>pre Anstey move away from Barley/Barkway to Tisbury in Wiltshire
and from
>there to Bristol and then onwards to the Antipodes.
>
>The Wiltshire connection is interesting with a seeming accidental name
>change from Catley to Cadley.
>
>The Anstey Cat*leys appear to have a major roll in the appearance of the
>Cat*ley name in Australia one way or another and I think that our new
found
>Lister, Ted Cattley is also of the Anstey Tree but I need to
check this
out
>yet to confirm..
>
Regards,
Mick Catley
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.4/424 - Release Date: 21/08/2006
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
CATLEY-request(a)rootsweb.com
with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes
in the subject and the body of the message