Hello Elaine,
I for one, am very pleased to welcome you to Catley@rootsweb. Am glad that
our private emails have resulted in your coming in to join us.
You will probably have noted the emails from both Jann and Sharon so you can
expect some support from other Barley line members.
Have also sent them copies of my Mk2 version James of Barley tree; that
which I sent to you earlier on today ......... that way you will have a
common database to work around.
Best wishes
Tim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Elaine Nash" <l.bellerby(a)btinternet.com>
To: <catley(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: [CATLEY] James Catley of Barley family tree c 1709
Hi Everybody,
I have been one of the sleepers on this list hoping something would come
my
way. I have only been researching my family tree for a couple of
years,
so
compared to some of you I am a novice. Tim thank you for you info
and I
would love to do more research on the Barley/Anstey tree as I think I have
already uncovered something new for it. I will plod on in my fashion and
let
you know if I find anything of importance.
Elaine
-----Original Message-----
From: catley-bounces(a)rootsweb.com [mailto:catley-bounces@rootsweb.com] On
Behalf Of Jann Parkes
Sent: 27 September 2007 09:57
To: catley(a)rootsweb.com
Subject: Re: [CATLEY] James Catley of Barley family tree c 1709
HI Tim,
That's fine with me. I'll take a look and let you know how it all sits
etc
-
and , YES let's hope there are a few more rellies out there who
may add
some
VIP info at some stage!
Cheers
Jann
-----Original Message-----
From: catley-bounces(a)rootsweb.com [mailto:catley-bounces@rootsweb.com] On
Behalf Of Tim Cattley
Sent: Thursday, 27 September 2007 6:24 PM
To: catley(a)rootsweb.com
Subject: Re: [CATLEY] James Catley of Barley family tree c 1709
Hi Jan,
Good to hear from you and no, being in NSW Aus, does not present a
problem.
Kay.H. is "down under" as well but with the amount of email
traffic
running
between herself/Liz.C./myself, it often feels as if she is just up
the
road!
You say you thought that the Anstey line was already being researched,
well
so did I some time ago, but in the last few years we have had almost
nil
correspondence about it on this site except for the likes of your goodself
and other stalwarts who are looking into the emigration branches etc from
the main Barley beginnings.
Having said that, I suppose now that someone will pop out of the woodwork
and prove me wrong and I hope this turns out to be the case because if
there
are Anstey researchers out there, they are either
"sleepers" on Catley
Rootsweb or have not found us yet?
I found Elaine on Genes Reunited and she seems to have got back to James
and
Alice all by herself from what I can gather which is no mean
achievement
and
I am hoping that maybe she will expand her searches/interests to the
full
tree in time.
I will send you what I have drawn up for your perusal and comments, what I
have done is to concentrate on mapping out the branches/sub branches and
trying to get the structure of the tree correct, as such I have omitted
"clutter" such as dates of birth and just noted the year of B/M/D.
As such, the data looks a bit skeletal but that is intentional, the detail
can be reinserted later.
Please do let me know what you think.
Cheers
Timcatt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jann Parkes" <jann_parkes(a)netspace.net.au>
To: <catley(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 7:49 AM
Subject: Re: [CATLEY] James Catley of Barley family tree c 1709
> Hi Tim,
> Jann P here! I'd love a copy of what ever data you have from this side
of
> the Catley tree and I could help with what ever you think needs
doing
with
> it.
>
> Thanks for trying to get something happening with it all! The only
reason
I
> have stayed with the Tassie lot is that I thought the Anstey tree was
> already being researched.
>
> Just to keep my CATLEY research in perspective - I have been given quite
a
> bit by Pat in Tassie and Dennis in NZ and Mick as well. So I
guess my
small
> amount of research has been simply added to the bulk of others - many
thank
> to all of them!
>
> I have been helped so much by Catley researchers that if I can help out
with
> your request that would be great - I could give something back - as long
as
> being here in NSW Australia is not going to be a hassle for you.
>
> Kind regards to all and please let me know if I can be of help,
> Jann Sutton Parkes
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: catley-bounces(a)rootsweb.com [mailto:catley-bounces@rootsweb.com]
On
> Behalf Of Tim Cattley
> Sent: Thursday, 27 September 2007 9:05 AM
> To: catley(a)rootsweb.com
> Subject: [CATLEY] James Catley of Barley family tree c 1709
>
> Hello all,
>
> Recent contact with Elaine who is a descendent of James Catley of Barley
m
> Alice 1709, has set me thinking that we do not appear to have
any
listers
> who are active on Anstey Tree research?
>
> The Anstey line is a main branch of the James of Barley (Hertfordshire)
> overall tree and whilst we have Mick who is covering all Herts+Cambs
> Cat*leys and Jann.P.who is specialising on the Tasmanian connection plus
> quite a few others looking into the Tisbury and Cadley connections plus
> Bristol and also emigrations to both South Australia and New South
Wales,
> nobody seems interested in the UK Anstey line as a whole?
>
> I have made contact here in the UK by researching a bit, with some five
> Anstey (non Listers) Cat*leys but none of them are sufficiently
interested
> in taking up the cause which is a great shame.
>
> There is data floating about from one Roger (Richard?) Tamplin the one
time
> Vicar of Anstey Church who searched the Anstey Parish Records and of
course
> Candis Lee Cattley-Sanders who has a web site which covers the main
> genealogy but there are errors and omissions in both works which were
done
> some time ago now.
>
> Is there anybody out there who is interested in the overall James of
Barley
> tree which includes the Anstey side?
>
> By playing around with Chris' Catley Database (1881 Census) and the
IGI's
> for Herts/Essex plus frontracking by writing to current London
based
> Cattleys, I have managed to come up with a hitherto "lost Anstey branch"
> which went into London's East End (as did so many other Catley tree
members)
> and coincidentally, this ties up with Elaine's researches.
>
> I have lumped all the data from Barley and Barkway plus Anstey, through
to
> Tisbury and Bristol and thence on to Hobart plus the New South
Wales and
> South Australia together into one workable major tree. Anyone want a
copy?
>
> It is not definitive but a blend of donated data to me from others plus
a
> bit of original research as well.
>
> Regards
>
> Timcatt
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> CATLEY-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
quotes
> in the subject and the body of the message
>
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
CATLEY-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes
in the subject and the body of the message
>
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
CATLEY-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes
in the subject and the body of the message
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
CATLEY-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes
in the subject and the body of the message
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
CATLEY-request(a)rootsweb.com
with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes
in the subject and the body of the message