Jocelyn,
I agree with you,the only reason why I have the 13 results is because I have
recorded them each time the person concerned has made their results public.
For the first five or so tests done by FTDNA on their Catley project, I could,
with my security code, gain access however there seem to have been a number of
website design changes which now prevent me doing anything useful other than
checking my personal dna matches.
Tim
On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 13:45:53 +1200
Jocelyn and Bert Prvanov via <catley(a)rootsweb.com> wrote:
Hi there Tim (and Liz),
Thanks for the update on the number of Cat*ley DNA tests that have been
done.
For some reason I can't see any information about these DNA results our
FTDNA Cat*ley projects page. The
Ysearch.org doesn't show 13 different
results either. Am I doing something wrong ?
Kind regards
Jocelyn
-----Original Message-----
From: catley-bounces(a)rootsweb.com [mailto:catley-bounces@rootsweb.com] On
Behalf Of Tim Cattley via
Sent: Friday, 7 August 2015 2:16 a.m.
To: catley(a)rootsweb.com
Subject: [CATLEY] Another Cat*ley Familytreedna test coming up
Listers may recall that we have some 13 different Cat*ley dna tests lodged
with FTDNA in the United States which have already shown that regionally,
some share common ancestors.
Thus the two Lincolnshire trees:- Thomas of Bottesford 1742 and William of
Kirton 1709 are connected
as are
The three Hertfordshire/Cambs/Essex ones:- James of Barley 1709. Joseph of
Royston 1771 and Joseph of Melbourn 1804.
and also
The four Yorks ones:- Stevan of Normanton 1580. Robert of Garforth 1690.
Edmund of Bilton 1724 and John of Leeds 1825. So close is the match between
Robert of Garforth and Edmund of Bilton (marker distance 1) that the
connection that joins them is now known.
However, new research has just come to light which indicates very strongly
that a connection exists between the Garforth-/-Bilton Catley tree and that
of Robert Catley of Rothwell. In the light of this news, I have today got a
a bona fide Rothwell male to volunteer to take the test. Fingers crossed for
another marker distance 1 result
We should not of course, overlook our four lonely dna tested trees where no
match has been found :-
Emery of Midsomer Norton 1731 Somerset
John of Hackney 1803
Thomas of Bath 1819
Charles of Greenwich 1867.
I suspect that the Emery of MSN tree is linked in to the Thomas of Welton
line, has anybody got any contact with a Welton male who would take the
test?
Regards
Tim
--
Tim Cattley <t.cattley(a)mypostoffice.co.uk>
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
CATLEY-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes
in the subject and the body of the message
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to CATLEY-request(a)rootsweb.com with
the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the
message
--
Tim Cattley <t.cattley(a)mypostoffice.co.uk>