Hi again Jocelyn,
If you are happy to undertake this, then I will provide you with data but it
is a very time consuming task, have you the time and resolve to do it?
Tim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jocelyn and Bert Prvanov" <prvanov(a)xtra.co.nz>
To: <catley(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 12:30 AM
Subject: Re: [CATLEY] how many catley trees
Hi there Liz,
I am happy to do that but I would need the most up to date spreadsheet.
Jocelyn
-----Original Message-----
From: catley-bounces(a)rootsweb.com [mailto:catley-bounces@rootsweb.com] On
Behalf Of lizcordingley
Sent: Saturday, 30 October 2010 12:22 p.m.
To: catley(a)rootsweb.com
Subject: Re: [CATLEY] how many catley trees
Hi Jocelyn,
How about you work forwards and I'll work backwards. That way we can
double
check our notes. What do you think
Liz
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jocelyn and Bert Prvanov" <prvanov(a)xtra.co.nz>
To: <catley(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 9:28 PM
Subject: Re: [CATLEY] how many catley trees
> Hi there,
> I have often thought about this as well but doing so using an earlier
> timeframe. If you encompassed the 1851 census it would be much easier and
> more reliable - less people, less mobile, and closer to the "source".
> Starting closer to the source would include more Cat*ley trees as each
> generation does not necessarily produce Cat*leys or males. A prime
> example
> of this is mine and Anne's Zachariah of Hackney tree. This tree will not
> feature if you used the ~1850-1911 timeframes or even anything after
> 1840.
> There may will be unidentified cousins or great aunts and uncles out
> there
> but they could not be linked to this tree unless you looked at the data
> prior to 1800.
>
> Maybe a two pronged approach would work, one prior to 1800 and the other
> using ~1860-1911 ??
>
> I have often also thought about plotting the birth places of these
> earlier
> Cat*leys on a map much like I did with the Cat*ley DNA results. This
> approach might be more useful if once this proposed exercise has been
> undertaken and there are still outliers.
>
> Jocelyn
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: catley-bounces(a)rootsweb.com [mailto:catley-bounces@rootsweb.com] On
> Behalf Of Tim Cattley
> Sent: Saturday, 30 October 2010 5:36 a.m.
> To: catley(a)rootsweb.com
> Subject: Re: [CATLEY] how many catley trees
>
> OK Liz,
> Shall I do them in baches of ten years at a time?
> Tim
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "lizcordingley" <lizcordingley(a)blueyonder.co.uk>
> To: <catley(a)rootsweb.com>
> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 5:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [CATLEY] how many catley trees
>
>
>> Hi Tim,
>> Can you send me the details for the ones no accounted for only.
>> Cheers
>> Liz
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Tim Cattley" <felis(a)mypostoffice.co.uk>
>> To: <catley(a)rootsweb.com>
>> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 1:18 PM
>> Subject: Re: [CATLEY] how many catley trees
>>
>>
>>> Hi Liz,
>>>
>>> Glad you think it feasible and worth the effort. Am with you about
>>> starting
>>> at the 1911 census and tracking back from there.
>>> So, the target window would be 1860-1910 ish.
>>> Just had a quick reckon up with the outstanding (UK) births for this 50
>>> year
>>> period and estimate it gives us about 600 to look at, which at first
>>> impression sounds a trifle daunting but of course, is only an average
>>> of
>>> about 12/annum which is not bad I think.
>>>
>>> Tim
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "lizcordingley" <lizcordingley(a)blueyonder.co.uk>
>>> To: <catley(a)rootsweb.com>
>>> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 10:57 AM
>>> Subject: [CATLEY] how many catley trees
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi Tim
>>>> I'm game. It would be helpful if you started at the 1911 census and
>>>> worked
>>>> backwards.
>>>> Liz
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
>>>> CATLEY-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without
the
>>>> quotes
>>>> in the subject and the body of the message
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>> This email has been scanned by Netintelligence
>>>>
http://www.netintelligence.com/email
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> This email has been scanned by Netintelligence
>>>
http://www.netintelligence.com/email
>>>
>>>
>>> -------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
>>> CATLEY-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
>>> quotes
>>> in the subject and the body of the message
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
>> CATLEY-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
>> quotes
>
>> in the subject and the body of the message
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> This email has been scanned by Netintelligence
>>
http://www.netintelligence.com/email
>>
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by Netintelligence
>
http://www.netintelligence.com/email
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> CATLEY-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes
> in the subject and the body of the message
>
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> CATLEY-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes
> in the subject and the body of the message
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
CATLEY-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes
in the subject and the body of the message
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
CATLEY-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes
in the subject and the body of the message
______________________________________________
This email has been scanned by Netintelligence
http://www.netintelligence.com/email
______________________________________________
This email has been scanned by Netintelligence