Beginning March 2nd, 2020 the Mailing Lists functionality on RootsWeb will be discontinued. Users will no longer be able to send outgoing emails or accept incoming emails. Additionally, administration tools will no longer be available to list administrators and mailing lists will be put into an archival state.
Administrators may save the emails in their list prior to March 2nd. After that, mailing list archives will remain available and searchable on RootsWeb
There is a whole ex slave family in the USA who use the Catley name, they
were in contact with me in the 1980's from one of the Southern States.
The family story there is that upon release from slavery and becoming free
men and the opportunity of choosing their own Surname, that they chose a
close alternative to their ex Masters name, thus turned Catlin into Catley.
There is also another story about an ex slave who escaped his Masters rule
and went and hid with the local native American Indians somewhere down in
the S.W. of the USA and hee too was supposed to use the name Catley.
No doubt the Patty-Brays and the Sanders Cat*ley researchers in the U.S.
will see your e-mail and respond more fully.
Regards Timcatt
----- Original Message -----
From: "liz cordingley" <lizcordingley(a)blueyonder.co.uk>
To: <catley(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 9:30 PM
Subject: [CATLEY] mixture
> Hi Lynda,
>
> If the DNA test doesn't give enough results they will send you another kit
> free.
>
>
>
> Hi Marg Tim and Kay
>
>
>
> I must say going through these census for the Pennsylvania lot is a bit of
a
> headache. Ive got back to John and Catherion from Seacroft Yorks. I
noticed
> that most of the male children born in Penns. served in WW1 & 2. and as
far
> as I can tell only one was injured.
>
> To make my life easier do we know how many children of Thomas and Ann's
went
> to USA?
>
>
>
> For All in USA
>
>
>
> Without being offensive does anybody have any mixed colour in their tree.
> Only as I go through the census more and more coloured people have the
name
> Cat(t)ley and I wondered if they could be from the slave days and then
took
> on their owners name.
>
> I know that one of my ancestors had 7 slaves but dont know the names it
> might help me with my quest as well.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Liz
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
CATLEY-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes
in the subject and the body of the message
>
Wonderful to see all the enthusiasm for the dna testing and to see
people making contact with long lost Catleys.
Tim, I haven't yet sent Marge that print out. Will hopefully
be back into the swing of things in Feb. Sorry about that.
kayh
Hi Liz,
I am going to reply more fully by direct e-mail so that I can send you
attachments which may help you here.
Will copy Kay in on it because she is deeply involved in the research albeit
that she is "off the air" until Feb earliest.
Regards Timcatt
----- Original Message -----
From: "liz cordingley" <lizcordingley(a)blueyonder.co.uk>
To: <catley(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 9:30 PM
Subject: [CATLEY] mixture
> Hi Lynda,
>
> If the DNA test doesn't give enough results they will send you another kit
> free.
>
>
>
> Hi Marg Tim and Kay
>
>
>
> I must say going through these census for the Pennsylvania lot is a bit of
a
> headache. Ive got back to John and Catherion from Seacroft Yorks. I
noticed
> that most of the male children born in Penns. served in WW1 & 2. and as
far
> as I can tell only one was injured.
>
> To make my life easier do we know how many children of Thomas and Ann's
went
> to USA?
>
>
>
> For All in USA
>
>
>
> Without being offensive does anybody have any mixed colour in their tree.
> Only as I go through the census more and more coloured people have the
name
> Cat(t)ley and I wondered if they could be from the slave days and then
took
> on their owners name.
>
> I know that one of my ancestors had 7 slaves but dont know the names it
> might help me with my quest as well.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Liz
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
CATLEY-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes
in the subject and the body of the message
>
Yes indeed Kay,
It is good to learn that group input from Listers is really beginning to
make things happen.
Don't worry about sending Marge the print out, I have attended to it in your
absence and am happy to announce that her grand nephew John Cattley has
shown an interest in the Pennsylvania Tree and will probably be assisting
her.
Regards Timcatt
----- Original Message -----
From: "William N H Heath" <hampden(a)bigpond.net.au>
To: <catley(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 10:32 PM
Subject: [CATLEY] dna tests etc...
> Wonderful to see all the enthusiasm for the dna testing and to see
> people making contact with long lost Catleys.
>
> Tim, I haven't yet sent Marge that print out. Will hopefully
> be back into the swing of things in Feb. Sorry about that.
>
> kayh
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
CATLEY-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes
in the subject and the body of the message
>
Hi Lynda,
If the DNA test doesn't give enough results they will send you another kit
free.
Hi Marg Tim and Kay
I must say going through these census for the Pennsylvania lot is a bit of a
headache. Ive got back to John and Catherion from Seacroft Yorks. I noticed
that most of the male children born in Penns. served in WW1 & 2. and as far
as I can tell only one was injured.
To make my life easier do we know how many children of Thomas and Ann's went
to USA?
For All in USA
Without being offensive does anybody have any mixed colour in their tree.
Only as I go through the census more and more coloured people have the name
Cat(t)ley and I wondered if they could be from the slave days and then took
on their owners name.
I know that one of my ancestors had 7 slaves but dont know the names it
might help me with my quest as well.
Thanks
Liz
Hi Liz and Tim and all,
I have used the DNA kit on my cousin Len today and did not realise it has to
be done 4 hours apart. Will collect it tomorrow and post back to US on
Monday.
To update any of you interested Mick (G'day} Catley with reference from Tim
has enabled me to be in touch with my Australian cousins who descended from my
Gt Uncle and who the family lost touch with from c. 1920. Photos have been
exchanged and the resemblences here and there are amazing. It is like
Christmas Day each time I am on line and receive another email from them. Looks
like when I go to Australia I will have family to call on now! Many Thanks Mick
- the door has opened and has answered so many conundrums! It seems when H A
Catley sailed his wife to Australia she left a son behind who was raised by
a maternal grandmother and whose line reside in St Helens Lancs to this day
- we have just made contact with them today and will update you. Lynda
Lynda Powers
07808 956894
01582 490918
OK Liz,
Agree with you re jargon,it got me totally lost too but as you say, expect
all will become clear as we go along.
Would like to keep tabs with you concerning the US census, because I have
been doing a bit of dabbling there being curious about two different Amos
Cattleys who arrived in Pennsylvania, one was the grandfather of our Marge
(Lister) but there is another one recorded from what appears to have been
an earlier emigration.
Cheers Timcatt
----- Original Message -----
From: "liz cordingley" <lizcordingley(a)blueyonder.co.uk>
To: <catley(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 12:41 AM
Subject: [CATLEY] DNA
> Hi Tim,
>
> Just a quick note. I think each person is told the results and it is
checked
> on their data base for a match. There is so much jargon that it gets a bit
> confusing, hopefully it will all fall into place once the results are
done.
>
>
>
> I am just going through the census for USA that are available on Ancestry.
I
> am then going to see if I can get a better picture of who is who.
>
>
>
> Liz
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
CATLEY-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes
in the subject and the body of the message
>
Hi Tim,
Just a quick note. I think each person is told the results and it is checked
on their data base for a match. There is so much jargon that it gets a bit
confusing, hopefully it will all fall into place once the results are done.
I am just going through the census for USA that are available on Ancestry. I
am then going to see if I can get a better picture of who is who.
Liz
Hi Liz et al,
Interesting reading re census distribution of the two main names between
1841 and 1891 but even more interesting if one dips into the IGI Records and
looks back another 250 years or so to around 1590 because although one may
have thought that the Surname could be of Lincolnshire or maybe Yorkshire
extraction (there are Catley records to show that they were at large in
Yorkshire at that time) there are also records to prove that the name was
also in the London area at the same time as well..
This only goes to suggest that if one subscribes to the theory that all
Cat*leys may possibly come from one single source, then obviously it must
have been well before 1590 which lends itself nicely into the thought that
the single source may have had something to do with the Gilbertine Monastic
settlement of Catley c 1143 out in the Lincolnshire Fens.
Some feel that such a proposal is just too nice and simple and cut and
dried, based on the place name (be that Cattle-ley, cows,sheep or whatever
livestock in a pasture .... or even "wild cat wood") and that many people in
many places in many Counties could well have used this root as their place
name.
Hopefully the DNA tests will go a long way towards giving us all an inkling
as to whether the Surname is indeed single, or multi sourced.
I am still not quite clear as to how much comparison information us
individuals receive from familytreedna but suppose it does not matter as
long as you do, in your role of coordinator and can advise us all as to
where dna links do/do not exist.
Regards Timcatt
----- Original Message -----
From: "liz cordingley" <lizcordingley(a)blueyonder.co.uk>
To: <catley(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 11:15 AM
Subject: [CATLEY] DNA Results
> HI Tim and All,
>
> Just to update you. My dads test has been received at Familytreedna. It
> will take 6 weeks to do the test on a 37 marker. Each person that does
the
> test will be notified of the result. Once all tests are done it will be
> easier to check the results.
>
> Due to the privacy act etc. the results are only open to the participant
and
> myself. However as we are all in this together the information will be
known
> to the list. Unless somebody does not want to share their info which
defeats
> the reasons for doing it in the first place.
>
> I have done a bit of research on the name distribution, comparing census
> results.
>
>
>
> In 1841 the name Catley came out as follows
>
>
>
> Essex 22
>
> Cambridge 19
>
> Herts 27
>
> Lincoln 54
>
> London 47
>
> Somerset 51
>
> Yorkshire 61
>
> There where the odd few scattered elsewhere.
>
>
>
> 1851
>
> Cambridge 21
>
> Essex 22
>
> Herts 56
>
> Lancs 17
>
> Lincoln 50
>
> London 76
>
> Somerset 66
>
> Warwick 19
>
> Yorkshire 86
>
> Again a few where scattered elsewhere
>
>
>
> 1861
>
> Cambridge 12
>
> Essex 21
>
> Herts 15
>
> Lancs 22
>
> Lincoln 83
>
> London 91
>
> Somerset 64
>
> Yorkshire 37
>
>
>
> 1871
>
> Cam 12
>
> Essex 17
>
> Herts 17
>
> Lancs 28
>
> Lincs 75
>
> London 129
>
> Som 35
>
> Warwick 16
>
> Yorkshire 32
>
>
>
> 1891
>
> Essex34
>
> Herts 61
>
> Lancs 35
>
> Lincs 34
>
> London 146
>
> Som 89
>
> Yorks 105
>
>
>
> Cattley
>
> 1841
>
> Lancs 13
>
> London 24
>
> Yorkshire 68
>
>
>
> 1891
>
> London 48
>
> Sussex 12
>
> Somerset 12
>
> Wor 10
>
> Yorkshire 69
>
>
>
> There where a lot of counties that had no Catley's living in them. It
> appears most are living in Yorkshire to start with and not Lincs. maybe we
> should be looking at Yorkshire for a begining of the name and not Lincs.
> Food for thought
>
>
>
> Liz
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
CATLEY-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes
in the subject and the body of the message
>
HI Tim and All,
Just to update you. My dads test has been received at Familytreedna. It
will take 6 weeks to do the test on a 37 marker. Each person that does the
test will be notified of the result. Once all tests are done it will be
easier to check the results.
Due to the privacy act etc. the results are only open to the participant and
myself. However as we are all in this together the information will be known
to the list. Unless somebody does not want to share their info which defeats
the reasons for doing it in the first place.
I have done a bit of research on the name distribution, comparing census
results.
In 1841 the name Catley came out as follows
Essex 22
Cambridge 19
Herts 27
Lincoln 54
London 47
Somerset 51
Yorkshire 61
There where the odd few scattered elsewhere.
1851
Cambridge 21
Essex 22
Herts 56
Lancs 17
Lincoln 50
London 76
Somerset 66
Warwick 19
Yorkshire 86
Again a few where scattered elsewhere
1861
Cambridge 12
Essex 21
Herts 15
Lancs 22
Lincoln 83
London 91
Somerset 64
Yorkshire 37
1871
Cam 12
Essex 17
Herts 17
Lancs 28
Lincs 75
London 129
Som 35
Warwick 16
Yorkshire 32
1891
Essex34
Herts 61
Lancs 35
Lincs 34
London 146
Som 89
Yorks 105
Cattley
1841
Lancs 13
London 24
Yorkshire 68
1891
London 48
Sussex 12
Somerset 12
Wor 10
Yorkshire 69
There where a lot of counties that had no Catley's living in them. It
appears most are living in Yorkshire to start with and not Lincs. maybe we
should be looking at Yorkshire for a begining of the name and not Lincs.
Food for thought
Liz
Liz:
Just to let you know that when I ordered the test kit for my brother in UK I
sent the company an email to include my email in the results info and got a
very prompt acknowledgement from them.
I though you statistics on the distribution of the name was very interesting
.
Glynis
----- Original Message -----
From: "liz cordingley" <lizcordingley(a)blueyonder.co.uk>
To: <catley(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 3:15 AM
Subject: [CATLEY] DNA Results
> HI Tim and All,
>
> Just to update you. My dads test has been received at Familytreedna. It
> will take 6 weeks to do the test on a 37 marker. Each person that does
> the
> test will be notified of the result. Once all tests are done it will be
> easier to check the results.
>
> Due to the privacy act etc. the results are only open to the participant
> and
> myself. However as we are all in this together the information will be
> known
> to the list. Unless somebody does not want to share their info which
> defeats
> the reasons for doing it in the first place.
>
> I have done a bit of research on the name distribution, comparing census
> results.
>
>
>
> In 1841 the name Catley came out as follows
>
>
>
> Essex 22
>
> Cambridge 19
>
> Herts 27
>
> Lincoln 54
>
> London 47
>
> Somerset 51
>
> Yorkshire 61
>
> There where the odd few scattered elsewhere.
>
>
>
> 1851
>
> Cambridge 21
>
> Essex 22
>
> Herts 56
>
> Lancs 17
>
> Lincoln 50
>
> London 76
>
> Somerset 66
>
> Warwick 19
>
> Yorkshire 86
>
> Again a few where scattered elsewhere
>
>
>
> 1861
>
> Cambridge 12
>
> Essex 21
>
> Herts 15
>
> Lancs 22
>
> Lincoln 83
>
> London 91
>
> Somerset 64
>
> Yorkshire 37
>
>
>
> 1871
>
> Cam 12
>
> Essex 17
>
> Herts 17
>
> Lancs 28
>
> Lincs 75
>
> London 129
>
> Som 35
>
> Warwick 16
>
> Yorkshire 32
>
>
>
> 1891
>
> Essex34
>
> Herts 61
>
> Lancs 35
>
> Lincs 34
>
> London 146
>
> Som 89
>
> Yorks 105
>
>
>
> Cattley
>
> 1841
>
> Lancs 13
>
> London 24
>
> Yorkshire 68
>
>
>
> 1891
>
> London 48
>
> Sussex 12
>
> Somerset 12
>
> Wor 10
>
> Yorkshire 69
>
>
>
> There where a lot of counties that had no Catley's living in them. It
> appears most are living in Yorkshire to start with and not Lincs. maybe we
> should be looking at Yorkshire for a begining of the name and not Lincs.
> Food for thought
>
>
>
> Liz
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> CATLEY-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes
> in the subject and the body of the message
Of course IF I had taken the trouble to read the green acceptance form
supplied in the testing kit first, would have understood the methodology and
thus not asked the questions Liz, sorry!
So, it seems now as if we all only get a contact from familytreedna if any
tests show a positive marker comparison between individuals and that we are
given the e-mail address of matching Catley testers? That's OK.
On a Regional basis, although I am not getting my hopes up too far, I will
me mighty surprised if we get negative results for the West Riding of
Yorkshire as there are just too many descendents from too many Trees too
close together (we are talking only a 50 mile radius here) NOT to be in some
way related, way back.
Suppose that the Herts/Cambs/Essex/London Cat*leys could equally argue the
same point on another area basis whereas the Lincolnshire Cat*leys could
suggest that they are regionally between the South Eastern Cat*leys and
those from Yorkshire and could well be the original source of all Cat*leys.
The results will begin to come out in the next couple of weeks now I hope
although I do not see any test response time given.
Can only hope, that as we get the results and start to make them known by
Lister discussion, that it entices others to join in and enable us all to
get a better overall Cat*ley dna picture of events?
Regards Timcatt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Cattley" <timjhcat(a)tiscali.co.uk>
To: <catley(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 11:39 PM
Subject: Re: [CATLEY] DNa
> Hi Liz,
>
> What is your understanding as to how familytreedna broadcast news as to
> finding matches/non matches for individuals within "The Cat*ley Family
Tree
> Test"?
>
> Are the results only made known to the co-ordinator or what?
>
> Maybe they simply announce that this person of this address has a Y37
marker
> match with that person of that address - information sent to both parties?
>
> Am sure that those of us who have ordered and recieved their sample kits
are
> asking the same or similar questions whilst scraping away at their inner
> cheek cellular linings for a full minute.
>
> If you understand the workings of this next phase, am sure that all us
> participants would be interested to know what to expect?
>
> Regards Timcatt
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "liz cordingley" <lizcordingley(a)blueyonder.co.uk>
> To: <catley(a)rootsweb.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 10:48 PM
> Subject: [CATLEY] DNa
>
>
> > Hi John
> >
> > Your kit was received today and is being tested. I am sure they will
send
> > you an email confirming this.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Liz
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> CATLEY-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes
> in the subject and the body of the message
> >
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
CATLEY-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes
in the subject and the body of the message
>
Hi Sharon,
Would appreciate your doing so because I have been reminded that there was a
female Cattley on my line who married an Edward Baker in 1810 and that he
hailed from Southampton so there is a possibility that the connection is
with the Stevan Catlay of Normanton Tree.
Best wishes Timcatt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sharon" <frizzyfiona(a)ntlworld.com>
To: <catley(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 8:04 AM
Subject: Re: [CATLEY] Selected Reports from the Salisbury &
WinchesterJournal
> Hi Tim
>
> I've not come across the Baker & Cattley business either - I'll look into
it
> in more detail! Thanks,
> Sharon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: catley-bounces(a)rootsweb.com [mailto:catley-bounces@rootsweb.com] On
> Behalf Of Tim Cattley
> Sent: 16 January 2007 22:52
> To: catley(a)rootsweb.com
> Subject: [CATLEY] Selected Reports from the Salisbury & Winchester Journal
>
> Hello All,
>
> >From Rootsweb: Newspaper Transcripts:-
>
> 1812, date and month not given for this advert included in The Salisbury
and
> Winchester Journal
>
> SOUTHAMPTON
>
> Just landed,.... A Cargo of fine HONDURAS MAHOGANY, of large dimentions,
and
> selling
> at very reasonable prices, by
>
> BAKER and CATTLEY.
>
> That's it, no address given so the assumption must be that the
Baker&Cattley
> business
> was located in Southampton?
>
> This is a new one to me, I was not aware of any Cat*leys either domestic
or
> business-wise operating in the Southampton area.
>
> Regards Timcatt
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> CATLEY-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes
> in the subject and the body of the message
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
CATLEY-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes
in the subject and the body of the message
>
Hi Tim
I've not come across the Baker & Cattley business either - I'll look into it
in more detail! Thanks,
Sharon
-----Original Message-----
From: catley-bounces(a)rootsweb.com [mailto:catley-bounces@rootsweb.com] On
Behalf Of Tim Cattley
Sent: 16 January 2007 22:52
To: catley(a)rootsweb.com
Subject: [CATLEY] Selected Reports from the Salisbury & Winchester Journal
Hello All,
>From Rootsweb: Newspaper Transcripts:-
1812, date and month not given for this advert included in The Salisbury and
Winchester Journal
SOUTHAMPTON
Just landed,.... A Cargo of fine HONDURAS MAHOGANY, of large dimentions, and
selling
at very reasonable prices, by
BAKER and CATTLEY.
That's it, no address given so the assumption must be that the Baker&Cattley
business
was located in Southampton?
This is a new one to me, I was not aware of any Cat*leys either domestic or
business-wise operating in the Southampton area.
Regards Timcatt
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
CATLEY-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes
in the subject and the body of the message
Hello All,
>From Rootsweb: Newspaper Transcripts:-
1812, date and month not given for this advert included in The Salisbury and Winchester Journal
SOUTHAMPTON
Just landed,.... A Cargo of fine HONDURAS MAHOGANY, of large dimentions, and selling
at very reasonable prices, by
BAKER and CATTLEY.
That's it, no address given so the assumption must be that the Baker&Cattley business
was located in Southampton?
This is a new one to me, I was not aware of any Cat*leys either domestic or business-wise operating in the Southampton area.
Regards Timcatt
Hi Tim and All,
I got a bit muddled. Selena Eleanor did marry Thomas Waller (note spelling)
and has been confirmed by a relative who has a copy of the marriage cert.
Selina was born abt 1826 Bow on Bromley. She had a sister called Ann b abt
1850 Bow remained single as recorded on 1901 census. Living with Selena's
son George.
Selenas father was Joseph b abt 1795 and her mother was Ellen not Ann as
stated. Recorded as a Slater on marriage cert. I found a Joseph b 1821 Bow
married to Sarah this could be her brother he had a Mary Anne b abt 1856 Bow
recorded as his niece in the 61 and 71 census. According to the census there
where a few Cat(t)ley's born in Bow so if anybody has any links to those so
I can illiminate them from my enquiry.
Cheers
Liz
P.S I will look into your DNA test kit
-------Original Message-------
From: catley(a)rootsweb.com
Date: 01/16/07 07:48:35
To: catley(a)rootsweb.com
Subject: Re: [CATLEY] Selina Cattley
Hi Liz,
Selina Eleanor Cattley rings no bells this side,
However apart from the Herts Cambs and Essex IGI processing I referred to in
my previous email to the Listers, I also have a small amount of London IGI
stuff still to extract and send to Chris and guess what?
Therein is shown the following:-
12/April 1846 Selena Eleanor Cattley m Thomas Walter Laurence at St
Dunstan,Stepney
ref no IGI batch MO55766 sheet 2404.
Unfortunately the IGI's I have, do not list any marriage in the London Area
between a Joseph Cat*ley and an Ann, nor any Selina birth/christening
either.
Sorry I can not be more helpful.
By the way no DNA kit arrived yet.
Regards Timcatt
----- Original Message -----
From: "liz cordingley" <lizcordingley(a)blueyonder.co.uk>
To: "catley" <CATLEY(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 6:05 PM
Subject: [CATLEY] Selina Cattley
> Hi All,
>
> Does anybody have Selina Eleanor Cattley father Joseph mother Ann in their
> tree. Selina was from Bromley by Bow. I am looking for information on
Joseph
> and Ann.
>
> Thanks
>
> Liz
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
CATLEY-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes
in the subject and the body of the message
>
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
CATLEY-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes
in the subject and the body of the message
Here's one for you Marge and John,
Extracted from the McDonald Outlook Newspaper dated August 6th 1925 by Bill & Sandy Miklavic <4therv(a)icubed.com> on Mon, 30 Aug 2004
Cattley-Ayres
Minni B. Ayres, McDonald
To
George H. Cattley, Pittsburgh
Parents; Clark Ayres, South Side
August 1st, 1925
Home of Brides father
Rev. W.D.Irons, D.D.
Attendants; Frances Cattley, Harry Ayres
Will reside in Pittsburgh.
I assume this is George Handle Cattley and that the attendee
Frances Cattley was his sister?
I can only guess on this because we do not have any dates for your tree since immigration in 1891?
Regards Timcatt
Hi Liz & Tim:
I am pleased to say my elder brother, Peter, has agreed to participate in the DNA test and have order the test for him.
best regards
Glynis