Beginning March 2nd, 2020 the Mailing Lists functionality on RootsWeb will be discontinued. Users will no longer be able to send outgoing emails or accept incoming emails. Additionally, administration tools will no longer be available to list administrators and mailing lists will be put into an archival state.
Administrators may save the emails in their list prior to March 2nd. After that, mailing list archives will remain available and searchable on RootsWeb
I think the Dep. Lt. still has standing in the community, isn't he the
person who
welcomes the Queen to the County when she visits??
p.s. Ros , you are in Mosman, I am in Neutral Bay.. maybe we could
get together some time for a coffee!!
my email is hampden(a)bigpond.net.au
kayh
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roslyn Chapman" <rosiecha(a)bigpond.net.au>
To: <CATLEY-L(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 4:08 PM
Subject: [CAT...] Help
>
> For someone to become Deputy-Lieutenant of the West Riding of Yorkshire in
> 1861 how long would the family have had to have some standing in the
> county?
>
> I have a Joseph Mason Tennant whose aunt was a Harriet Cattley. I am
> trying
> to find out a bit more about the Tennant family. In 1791 when James
> Tennant
> married Harriet Cattley, James was listed as a Broker and Merchant, when
> he
> was 23 years old so I assume the family had standing in the late 1700s.
>
> Any ideas.
>
> Ros Chapman, Mosman, NSW, Australia
>
>
>
> ==== CATLEY Mailing List ====
> See our CAT(T)LEY One-Name pages at :
> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~hills/index.html
>
> ==============================
> Census images 1901, 1891, 1881 and 1871, plus so much more.
> Ancestry.com's United Kingdom & Ireland Collection. Learn more:
> http://www.ancestry.com/s13968/rd.ashx
>
>
Hello Ros,
I have your 13 page spread of data on the James Tennant m Harriet Cattley
and thus assumed that
you knew that the Harriet in question belongs to my (and Ericas') Cattley
family tree?
She bapt 1766 London (St Clements) and m James Tennant of Leeds and Kippax
in 1791.
She was one of 11 children born to Stephen Cattley who m Ann(Frances Maria)
Bode at St Michaels, Crooked La,London in 1754.
Stephen went to London from Yorkshire as a young man and made his fortune
there. He became a Merchant and property dealer, founding the company
Hardcastle&Cattley with trading houses in London and St Petersburg. He also
lived in property within the City of London but had other properties in
Islington (London) Westbury (Essex, I think) and Kippax (Yorks). He died at
and was buried in, Kippax in 1797.
I have a Conveyance on velum, dated April 1805 regarding the sale of some
cottages and land from Stephens estate in Kippax and the trustee signatures
include both James Tennant and his wife Harriet.
Apart from your work, the only alternative data source is from one Frank
Moberly and he only followed the Tennant line back up some two generations
from the Tennant/Cattley marriage and has no more to offer than that which
you already know.
Erica may have some input on the Tennant side as to what their family
circumstances were.
Regards Timcatt
----- Original Message -----
From: Roslyn Chapman <rosiecha(a)bigpond.net.au>
To: <CATLEY-L(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 5:08 AM
Subject: [CAT...] Help
>
> For someone to become Deputy-Lieutenant of the West Riding of Yorkshire in
> 1861 how long would the family have had to have some standing in the
county?
>
> I have a Joseph Mason Tennant whose aunt was a Harriet Cattley. I am
trying
> to find out a bit more about the Tennant family. In 1791 when James
Tennant
> married Harriet Cattley, James was listed as a Broker and Merchant, when
he
> was 23 years old so I assume the family had standing in the late 1700s.
>
> Any ideas.
>
> Ros Chapman, Mosman, NSW, Australia
>
>
>
> ==== CATLEY Mailing List ====
> See our CAT(T)LEY One-Name pages at :
> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~hills/index.html
>
> ==============================
> Census images 1901, 1891, 1881 and 1871, plus so much more.
> Ancestry.com's United Kingdom & Ireland Collection. Learn more:
http://www.ancestry.com/s13968/rd.ashx
>
How Do Mick,
Have you any information for me which would assist my quest in attempting to tie in a set of Cattleys to the main Anstey Cat*ley Tree as explained in my email to you of the 5th November?
Considering just how large the Anstey Tree is, it is therefore a sorrow to me that none of the living relations that I know of (quite a few both here in the UK and also in Australia) seem interested enough to grasp onto their genealogy. A nine generation Tree comprising, at a guess, some 300+ people is a dream in many researchers eyes yet few Ansteys seem bothered!
Fully realise that the Anstey connection is only one of many you are following but I would really appreciate any assistance that you can shed.
Regards
Timcatt
Hello Kay,
Many thanks for the information.
For obvious reasons I am going to call your Catley line "William of Farndon"
and enter as such into my Master Cattley GRO list against the entries there
for both Eliza Jane b 1848 and Thomas b 1849 with a note concerning the
spelling changes.
Looking foward to seeing you again next spring.
Regards Timcatt
----- Original Message -----
From: Kay <chantrey2000(a)btinternet.com>
To: <CATLEY-L(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: [CAT...] Catley
> Hi Tim
> Thank you for your email. The CATLEY tree is just a small branch of my
> family as I've followed it up my maternal line, so I tend to refer to them
> as "my Catleys" :-)
> I've pasted a copy of my tree as it stands at the moment. I haven't
managed
> to "prove" everyone in the generations above William CATLEY (DOB 1821 in
> Farndon) as I need to gather information from several different sources
> which will prove they belong to me and it gets so difficult when we reach
> 1837 and can't refer to GRO and census records.
> I don't know if this will help to tie up loose ends on the CATLEY list but
> after viewing the 1851 census I suspect that Jane ETCHES who had been
> married to Thomas CATLEY (DOB 1784) remarried. I found her aged 60 living
in
> Farndon in 1851 married to Joseph ANDERSON, her daughter Ann CATLEY aged
37
> was also living with them.
> Best regards
> Kay
>
> ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
> Descendants of William CATLEY
> 1 William CATLEY
> +Ann
> 2 William CATLEY b: 1778 in Farndon, Nottinghamshire
> 2 Richard CATLEY b: 1780 Died: Mar 1785
> 2 Ann CATLEY b: 1781 in Farndon, Nottinghamshire
> 2 Thomas CATLEY b: 1784 in Farndon, Nottinghamshire
> +Jane ETCHES Married: 12 Jun 1809
> 3 Ann CATLEY b: 1813 in Farndon, Nottinghamshire
> 3 Elizabeth CATLEY b: 1816 in Farndon, Nottinghamshire
> 3 Richard CATLEY b: 1818 in Farndon, Nottinghamshire Died: Jun 1818
> 3 Eliza CATLEY b: 1819 in Farndon, Nottinghamshire
> 3 William CATLEY b: 1821 in Farndon, Nottinghamshire Died: 31 Aug 1865
> +Zilpha BELL aka: Sarah b: 1818 in Balderton, Nottinghamshire Married: 16
> Dec 1845 Died: 1875
> 4 Elizabeth CATLEY b: about 1846 in Fiskerton, Nottinghamshire
> 4 Eliza Jane CATLEY b: 26 Mar 1848 in North Muskham, Nottinghamshire Died:
> 06 Jun 1901
> +Denby COGGAN b: 1857 in Haxey, Lincolnshire Married: 12 Mar 1876 Died:
1919
> 4 Thomas CATLEY b: 1849 in North Muskham, Nottinghamshire Died: 1883
> 4 Ann CATLEY b: 1852 in North Muskham, Nottinghamshire (Southwell Q2 7b
242)
> +James PACEY b: 1852 Married: 26 Oct 1873 Died: 25 Aug 1900
> 2 Elizabeth CATLEY b: 1786 in Farndon, Nottinghamshire
> ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
>
>
> ==== CATLEY Mailing List ====
> See our CAT(T)LEY One-Name pages at :
> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~hills/index.html
>
> ==============================
> Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the
> last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more:
http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx
>
Hi Tim
Thank you for your email. The CATLEY tree is just a small branch of my
family as I've followed it up my maternal line, so I tend to refer to them
as "my Catleys" :-)
I've pasted a copy of my tree as it stands at the moment. I haven't managed
to "prove" everyone in the generations above William CATLEY (DOB 1821 in
Farndon) as I need to gather information from several different sources
which will prove they belong to me and it gets so difficult when we reach
1837 and can't refer to GRO and census records.
I don't know if this will help to tie up loose ends on the CATLEY list but
after viewing the 1851 census I suspect that Jane ETCHES who had been
married to Thomas CATLEY (DOB 1784) remarried. I found her aged 60 living in
Farndon in 1851 married to Joseph ANDERSON, her daughter Ann CATLEY aged 37
was also living with them.
Best regards
Kay
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Descendants of William CATLEY
1 William CATLEY
+Ann
2 William CATLEY b: 1778 in Farndon, Nottinghamshire
2 Richard CATLEY b: 1780 Died: Mar 1785
2 Ann CATLEY b: 1781 in Farndon, Nottinghamshire
2 Thomas CATLEY b: 1784 in Farndon, Nottinghamshire
+Jane ETCHES Married: 12 Jun 1809
3 Ann CATLEY b: 1813 in Farndon, Nottinghamshire
3 Elizabeth CATLEY b: 1816 in Farndon, Nottinghamshire
3 Richard CATLEY b: 1818 in Farndon, Nottinghamshire Died: Jun 1818
3 Eliza CATLEY b: 1819 in Farndon, Nottinghamshire
3 William CATLEY b: 1821 in Farndon, Nottinghamshire Died: 31 Aug 1865
+Zilpha BELL aka: Sarah b: 1818 in Balderton, Nottinghamshire Married: 16
Dec 1845 Died: 1875
4 Elizabeth CATLEY b: about 1846 in Fiskerton, Nottinghamshire
4 Eliza Jane CATLEY b: 26 Mar 1848 in North Muskham, Nottinghamshire Died:
06 Jun 1901
+Denby COGGAN b: 1857 in Haxey, Lincolnshire Married: 12 Mar 1876 Died: 1919
4 Thomas CATLEY b: 1849 in North Muskham, Nottinghamshire Died: 1883
4 Ann CATLEY b: 1852 in North Muskham, Nottinghamshire (Southwell Q2 7b 242)
+James PACEY b: 1852 Married: 26 Oct 1873 Died: 25 Aug 1900
2 Elizabeth CATLEY b: 1786 in Farndon, Nottinghamshire
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Following taken from
Lincolnshire Family History Society's recently released CD of 'Lincolnshire
Inquests 1753-1880'.
David Meredith
Nottingham
LINCOLNSHIRE INQUESTS: LINDSEY QUARTER SESSIONS 1773 TO 1848
Inquest held 28 Oct 1845 at Springthorpe on the body of William Catley. [LQS
A/1/649/3]
LINCOLNSHIRE INQUESTS FROM NEWSPAPERS
Inquest at Gainsboro'. Reports of a very serious nature having been in
circulation respecting the death
of Jane Catley, noticed in our obituary of last week, Mr. Coroner Hitchins
insisted upon an
investigation, and he accordingly issued his warrant and held an inquest over
the body at the
Turk's Head last Monday. The enquiry has been important from two
considerations - first, as
proving the report of the deceased's having been poisoned by her daughter, to be
entirely without
foundation; and also as preventing the contravention by any one of the
administration of justice.
Mr. Jerems, it is to be remarked, the burgess constable, did not give the
necessary information to
the coroner, because he was told by the medical attendant that it was
unnecessary. The Jury
assembled at 12 o'clock, and continued the enquiry for eight hours: the coroner
then ordered a post
mortem examination, which occupied Messrs. Cook and Wilmot for above three
hours; the usual
decisive tests were applied, but no arsenic or any other poisonous matter was
discovered; and Mr
Cook gave it as his opinion, in which he was confirmed by Mr Wilmot, that the
deceased had a
strangulated hernia, and that the whole of the parts were highly inflamed, which
caused her death.
The Jury returned a verdict accordingly. The coroner then issued his order for
her burial, and at
eight o'clock the same night she was interred in Gainsboro' church-yard. Such
was the interest
excited that a dense crowd was outside waiting the decision of the Jury. Several
of the Jurymen
waited on our correspondent, and expressed their anxiety that the daughter of
the deceased might
be fairly exonerated before the public, which we consider to be but an act of
justice. [LRSM
Friday 4 Jan 1839]
INQUESTS HELD BEFORE MR MARRIS Ref: Lamb 4/2-5
When Inquest held and Where / When died and where / Name and Surname / Sex / Age
/ Rank
or Profession / Cause of Death / When information sent to registrar
2 Jan 1854 Caistor / 1 Jan 1853 [sic] Caistor / Edward Catley / M / 9 wks / Son
of William Catley of
Caistor Bootmaker / Accidental suffocation / 8 Feb
3 Aug 1858 Goxhill / 1 Aug Goxhill / Mark Catley / M / 7 / son of John Catley
Farmer / Accidentally
killed by falling from a pole placed between two apple trees / 14 Aug
OK,
That's fine Kay, just double checking to be certain and now I can append
your Cat*ley Tree name against the appropriate entries in the CATTLEY Lists.
That means I can now account for about 50% of all Cattley entries ex PRO.
However I would still like to have your title for this Tree but have lost
the plot as to where you are?
What are you calling it at present? Christian name of placename would be
sufficient eg Eli of Saltburn or whatever?
Note that Liz has just run into the Catley/Cattley spelling differential
problem same as you and had some head scratching for a while.
Have often wondered why the name got mis-spelled so often by the addition of
another T. Obviously it did because there are so many instances, but it
does seem rather odd to me, spelling errors are usually the replacement of a
wrong letter against the correct one, or maybe the dropping of a letter.
In our cases of course, we have the opposite ie the inclusion and doubling
of the T. All very odd.
Cheers Tim
----- Original Message -----
From: Kay <chantrey2000(a)btinternet.com>
To: <CATLEY-L(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 1:51 AM
Subject: Re: [CAT...] Catley
> Hi Tim
>
> Yes I'm pretty certain that Eliza Jane and Thomas belong to my tree. Their
name has been mis-spelt on their birth registrations as it should be spelt
CATLEY.
>
> I searched for ages for Eliza Jane's birth and was even wondering if she
hadn't been registered, it was only when I saw it listed on the CATTLEY page
that I realised I should have also been looking at other variations of the
name.
>
> I have a copy of Eliza Jane's birth certificate which gives her Mom's
maiden name as Zilpha BELL and this fitted in with the information I already
had.
>
> best regards
> Kay
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Tim Cattley
> To: CATLEY-L(a)rootsweb.com
> Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 11:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [CAT...] Catley
>
>
> >Hi Kay,
> >Re the information you have sent to Liz: I note two Cattley spellings
ie
> Eliza Jane b 1848 and Thomas b 1949 both at Southwell, Notts.
> >Both persons appear in the Public Record Office lists of births under
> Cattley.
> >Are you indicating that you have a positive identification for both on
your
> Catley tree?
> >I ask because I am working on the PRO b/m/d Cattley lists and
attempting to
> identify each entry to its own specific tree.
> >So, if you are claiming both persons as your tree members, would you
> confirm this for me and let me know what title you apply to your Tree
>so
> that I can entitle them on my main list accordingly?
> >Cheers Tim---- Original Message -----
> From: Kay <chantrey2000(a)btinternet.com>
> To: <CATLEY-L(a)rootsweb.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 6:14 PM
> Subject: Fw: [CAT...] Catley
>
>
> > Hi Liz
> >
> > It sounds as though you have a difficult task. I've copied and pasted
some
> > my Catley family information for you, I thought it might help a bit.
> >
> > best wishes
> > Kay
> > ___________________________
> > 1851: HO1071 / Piece: 2135 / Folio: 420 / Page: ?
> > Parish: North Muskham
> > Dwelling:
> > NAME / RELATION / MARITAL STATUS / GENDER / AGE / BIRTHPLACE /
OCCUPATION
> > William CATLEY / Head / M / Male / 30 / Fardon, Notts /
> > Agricultural Labourer
> > Zilpha CATLEY / Wife / M / Female / 33 / Balderton, Notts /
> Wife
> > Elizabeth CATLEY / Daur / - / Female / 5 / Fiskerton, Notts
> > Jane CATLEY / Daur / - / Female / 3 / Muskham, Notts
> > Thomas CATLEY / Son / - / Male / 1 / Muskham, Notts
> >
> > William CATLEY DOB 1821
> > Marriage XV 1225 Q4 1845 Southwell m Zilpah BELL
> > Death 7b 169 Q3 1865 Southwell
> >
> > Elizabeth CATLEY DOB 1846
> >
> > Eliza Jane CATLEY DOB 1848
> > Birth XV 652 Q2 1848 CATTLEY Southwell
> > Marriage 9c 426 Q1 1876 Sheffield m Denby COGGAN
> > Death 9c 286 Q2 1901 52 Sheffield
> >
> > Thomas CATLEY DOB 1849
> > Birth XV 623 Q4 1849 CATTLEY Southwell
> > Death 9c 318 Q3 1883 33 Sheffield
> >
> > Ann CATLEY DOB 1852
> > Marriage 9c 568 Q4 1873 Sheffield m James PACEY
> >
> >
> > ==== CATLEY Mailing List ====
> > See our CAT(T)LEY One-Name pages at :
> > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~hills/index.html
> >
> > ==============================
> > Census images 1901, 1891, 1881 and 1871, plus so much more.
> > Ancestry.com's United Kingdom & Ireland Collection. Learn more:
> http://www.ancestry.com/s13968/rd.ashx
> >
>
>
> ==== CATLEY Mailing List ====
> See our CAT(T)LEY One-Name pages at :
> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~hills/index.html
>
> ==============================
> View and search Historical Newspapers. Read about your ancestors, find
> marriage announcements and more. Learn more:
> http://www.ancestry.com/s13969/rd.ashx
>
>
> ==== CATLEY Mailing List ====
> See our CAT(T)LEY One-Name pages at :
> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~hills/index.html
>
> ==============================
> Jumpstart your genealogy with OneWorldTree. Search not only for
> ancestors, but entire generations. Learn more:
> http://www.ancestry.com/s13972/rd.ashx
>
Hi Tim
Yes I'm pretty certain that Eliza Jane and Thomas belong to my tree. Their
name has been mis-spelt on their birth registrations as it should be spelt
CATLEY.
I searched for ages for Eliza Jane's birth and was even wondering if she
hadn't been registered, it was only when I saw it listed on the CATTLEY page
that I realised I should have also been looking at other variations of the
name.
I have a copy of Eliza Jane's birth certificate which gives her Mom's maiden
name as Zilpha BELL and this fitted in with the information I already had.
best regards
Kay
>Hi Kay,
>Re the information you have sent to Liz: I note two Cattley spellings ie
Eliza Jane b 1848 and Thomas b 1949 both at Southwell, Notts.
>Both persons appear in the Public Record Office lists of births under
Cattley.
>Are you indicating that you have a positive identification for both on your
Catley tree?
>I ask because I am working on the PRO b/m/d Cattley lists and attempting to
identify each entry to its own specific tree.
>So, if you are claiming both persons as your tree members, would you
confirm this for me and let me know what title you apply to your Tree >so
that I can entitle them on my main list accordingly?
>Cheers Tim---- Original Message -----
From: Kay <chantrey2000(a)btinternet.com>
To: <CATLEY-L(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 6:14 PM
Subject: Fw: [CAT...] Catley
> Hi Liz
>
> It sounds as though you have a difficult task. I've copied and pasted some
> my Catley family information for you, I thought it might help a bit.
>
> best wishes
> Kay
> ___________________________
> 1851: HO1071 / Piece: 2135 / Folio: 420 / Page: ?
> Parish: North Muskham
> Dwelling:
> NAME / RELATION / MARITAL STATUS / GENDER / AGE / BIRTHPLACE / OCCUPATION
> William CATLEY / Head / M / Male / 30 / Fardon, Notts /
> Agricultural Labourer
> Zilpha CATLEY / Wife / M / Female / 33 / Balderton, Notts /
Wife
> Elizabeth CATLEY / Daur / - / Female / 5 / Fiskerton, Notts
> Jane CATLEY / Daur / - / Female / 3 / Muskham, Notts
> Thomas CATLEY / Son / - / Male / 1 / Muskham, Notts
>
> William CATLEY DOB 1821
> Marriage XV 1225 Q4 1845 Southwell m Zilpah BELL
> Death 7b 169 Q3 1865 Southwell
>
> Elizabeth CATLEY DOB 1846
>
> Eliza Jane CATLEY DOB 1848
> Birth XV 652 Q2 1848 CATTLEY Southwell
> Marriage 9c 426 Q1 1876 Sheffield m Denby COGGAN
> Death 9c 286 Q2 1901 52 Sheffield
>
> Thomas CATLEY DOB 1849
> Birth XV 623 Q4 1849 CATTLEY Southwell
> Death 9c 318 Q3 1883 33 Sheffield
>
> Ann CATLEY DOB 1852
> Marriage 9c 568 Q4 1873 Sheffield m James PACEY
>
>
> ==== CATLEY Mailing List ====
> See our CAT(T)LEY One-Name pages at :
> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~hills/index.html
>
> ==============================
> Census images 1901, 1891, 1881 and 1871, plus so much more.
> Ancestry.com's United Kingdom & Ireland Collection. Learn more:
http://www.ancestry.com/s13968/rd.ashx
>
>Hello Liz,
>Understand exactly how frustrating it is when you find that the surname
keeps bouncing around between the single and double T spelling.
>Am pretty fortunate with my own Tree as they seemed to have settled on
Cattley quite quickly but not so with the Anstey Cat*leys which I am doing a
bit of work on at present. One way of spelling on IGI and another on the
Census for the same person, drives me bats!
>Have been pondering on what on earth "Reduced Ordinance" means in relation
to declared Profession. I suppose it was ordinance and not ordnance was it?
Either way it still does not make much sense to me, because I see ordinance
as some form of decree or authoritative order or legislation from
Government. Maybe some other Listers can shed some light on the issue?
>I too am surprised by just how much travelling about some tree members did
in setting up in new areas presumably to gain new employment,for example we
know of a branch of the Anstey Cat*leys who travelled from rural
Hertfordshire to rural Wiltshire, a journey that could not have been easy in
the mid 1700's.
>Likewise in my family, we have an account of a Cattley ancestor who left
his native rural Yorkshire home at a young age to "make his fortune" in
London and he travelled by way of a carter who journeyed between York and
London carrying goods on a regular basis. The journey took over a week at
horse (or bullock) plodding pace.
>Am glad that You/I swopped Catley/Cattley PRO B/M/D's because as you say,
you have had to access my Cattley records on a number of occasions to cross
check. I too have found your Catley data invaluable for exactley the same
reason but in reverse!
>I see that KayH has put some stuff your way which may prove helpful and as
to the Lincolnshire connections, I feel shure that Dave Meredith will be
monitoring your information and might possibly come up with some information
as he seems to have Lincs well covered as far as Parish Records are
concerned.
>Thanks for the progress report
>Regards to all Tim catt
----- Original Message -----
From: liz cordingley <lizcordingley(a)blueyonder.co.uk>
To: <CATLEY-L(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 8:03 AM
Subject: [CAT...] Catley
> Hi Tim,
> I have been doing a little project or should I say a large project!! With
the 1851 census I have been trying to match up families with my BMD list
however I'm finding it very difficult. Firstly I keep having to check your
list and secondly I have some people who are just not on either list.
Secondly I have found some registered as Catley and some within the same
family registered as Cattley.
> Its very slow going at the moment.
>
> The other thing I have found a load of Catley's that I am hoping belong to
my tree in Sussex before the registration period starts.
> Zaccheaus father Thomas. It seems he married twice firstly to Mary unknown
she died 8/9/1808 then to Ann Tanner in 1811 both where widows. There is
also a Benjamin who married in 1825 to Charlotte Thorpe. My dads cousins
husband is a member of the Sussex Family H. S. he has loads of microfiche
etc and is going to look at some of these today. Looking at the IGI records
for Lincolnshire Thomas had a brother Zaccheaus (who I thought was my
Zaccheaus dad but is his Uncle) He also had a brother called Benjamin could
this be the same one and maybe he married twice.
> I have been trying to figure out why and what brought them from
Lincolnshire to Yorkshire then London then Sussex in the space of less then
10 years. The only form of transport would have been a stage couch or by
sea. Hastings has no canals. At the turn of the 1800's the only main
industry in Hastings was fishing but Thomas is recorded on 51 census in his
profession as Reduced Ordinance. Any clues as to what that would be?
> Talk soon
> Liz
>
>
> ==== CATLEY Mailing List ====
> See our CAT(T)LEY One-Name pages at :
> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~hills/index.html
>
> ==============================
> Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the
> last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more:
http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx
>
Thanks for the information Ros,
I do not immediately recognise a Christine from our own Cattley family in
Australia however no doubt Erica will have some idea as to which tree she
belongs to.
Cheers Tim
----- Original Message -----
From: Roslyn Chapman <rosiecha(a)bigpond.net.au>
To: <CATLEY-L(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 2:42 AM
Subject: RE: [CAT...] Christine Cattley
> Sorry. I forgot to say that I live in Sydney, Australia. Ros
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roslyn Chapman [mailto:rosiecha@bigpond.net.au]
> Sent: Thursday, 10 November 2005 11:17 AM
> To: CATLEY-L(a)rootsweb.com
> Subject: [CAT...] Christine Cattley
>
>
> There was a photo of a Christine Cattley who is bucking the trend and
going
> to University. Her father, no name in article, works in the post office.
> Don't know if it is of interest to Erica or Tim. Ros Chapman
>
>
>
> ==== CATLEY Mailing List ====
> See our CAT(T)LEY One-Name pages at :
> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~hills/index.html
>
> ==============================
> Census images 1901, 1891, 1881 and 1871, plus so much more.
> Ancestry.com's United Kingdom & Ireland Collection. Learn more:
> http://www.ancestry.com/s13968/rd.ashx
>
>
>
>
> ==== CATLEY Mailing List ====
> See our CAT(T)LEY One-Name pages at :
> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~hills/index.html
>
> ==============================
> Search Family and Local Histories for stories about your family and the
> areas they lived. Over 85 million names added in the last 12 months.
> Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13966/rd.ashx
>
Hi Liz
It sounds as though you have a difficult task. I've copied and pasted some
my Catley family information for you, I thought it might help a bit.
best wishes
Kay
___________________________
1851: HO1071 / Piece: 2135 / Folio: 420 / Page: ?
Parish: North Muskham
Dwelling:
NAME / RELATION / MARITAL STATUS / GENDER / AGE / BIRTHPLACE / OCCUPATION
William CATLEY / Head / M / Male / 30 / Fardon, Notts /
Agricultural Labourer
Zilpha CATLEY / Wife / M / Female / 33 / Balderton, Notts / Wife
Elizabeth CATLEY / Daur / - / Female / 5 / Fiskerton, Notts
Jane CATLEY / Daur / - / Female / 3 / Muskham, Notts
Thomas CATLEY / Son / - / Male / 1 / Muskham, Notts
William CATLEY DOB 1821
Marriage XV 1225 Q4 1845 Southwell m Zilpah BELL
Death 7b 169 Q3 1865 Southwell
Elizabeth CATLEY DOB 1846
Eliza Jane CATLEY DOB 1848
Birth XV 652 Q2 1848 CATTLEY Southwell
Marriage 9c 426 Q1 1876 Sheffield m Denby COGGAN
Death 9c 286 Q2 1901 52 Sheffield
Thomas CATLEY DOB 1849
Birth XV 623 Q4 1849 CATTLEY Southwell
Death 9c 318 Q3 1883 33 Sheffield
Ann CATLEY DOB 1852
Marriage 9c 568 Q4 1873 Sheffield m James PACEY
There was a photo of a Christine Cattley who is bucking the trend and going
to University. Her father, no name in article, works in the post office.
Don't know if it is of interest to Erica or Tim. Ros Chapman
Hi Tim,
I have been doing a little project or should I say a large project!! With the 1851 census I have been trying to match up families with my BMD list however I'm finding it very difficult. Firstly I keep having to check your list and secondly I have some people who are just not on either list. Secondly I have found some registered as Catley and some within the same family registered as Cattley.
Its very slow going at the moment.
The other thing I have found a load of Catley's that I am hoping belong to my tree in Sussex before the registration period starts.
Zaccheaus father Thomas. It seems he married twice firstly to Mary unknown she died 8/9/1808 then to Ann Tanner in 1811 both where widows. There is also a Benjamin who married in 1825 to Charlotte Thorpe. My dads cousins husband is a member of the Sussex Family H. S. he has loads of microfiche etc and is going to look at some of these today. Looking at the IGI records for Lincolnshire Thomas had a brother Zaccheaus (who I thought was my Zaccheaus dad but is his Uncle) He also had a brother called Benjamin could this be the same one and maybe he married twice.
I have been trying to figure out why and what brought them from Lincolnshire to Yorkshire then London then Sussex in the space of less then 10 years. The only form of transport would have been a stage couch or by sea. Hastings has no canals. At the turn of the 1800's the only main industry in Hastings was fishing but Thomas is recorded on 51 census in his profession as Reduced Ordinance. Any clues as to what that would be?
Talk soon
Liz
Hi All,
Just found the death of Zaccheaus first wife Rebecca. She was buried 12/8/1826 aged 30 years at St Mary in the Castle Hastings Sussex.
Also found Benjamin 25/8/1825 aged 14 months who was Zaccheaus and Rebecca's son christened 23/4/1824 As above parish.
Mary was buried 8/9/1808 age unknown but also at Hastings. Have yet to discover who she is. Could have been Zaccheaus father Thomas's wife.
Liz
Hi All,
Found this item at www.durham-miner.org.uk
Wm Catley District Rock Inspector Mr Brough cert. no. 2293 won 1st class cert. of service as a manager of mine granted under the coal mines regulation act 1872. dated 5/12/1873.
Also at www.cmhrc.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk
Between 1910-1914 William Catley injured.
I am assuming its the same William Catley but have no idea where Rock mine is. If he belongs to anybody there is a link for further information.
Liz
Hi Everyone,
This is probably old hat, but in checking through the 1837.online
database to clarify a registration name, I came upon this entry :
Violet Gladys CATTLEY b Leeds Jan Quarter 1905 9B 428
Anyone claim her ?
Cheers.... Erica
Hello Liz,
Yes you are quite correct, these are the children of Stephen Reed Cattley
(1807-1876) and a mis-spelling by the "authorities" as far as his issue is
concerned. They are members therefore of my Cattley Tree.
Cecelia or rather Cecelia Susan, to give her full entitlement, married
Travers Wire, the son of the Lord Mayor of London.
Regards ....... Tim C.
----- Original Message -----
From: liz cordingley <lizcordingley(a)blueyonder.co.uk>
To: <CATLEY-L(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 10:11 PM
Subject: [CAT...] 1841 census
> Hi All,
> Just found this on the 1841 census.
> HO107/0468/4 F31 Thanet area Kent. Sorry no other details except they
where there on the census.
>
> Henry Catley 6
> Isabella 5
> Mary 4
> Cecelia
> Looking at the 1851 census they belong to Stephen R Cattley
> Please note the spelling
> Liz
>
>
> ==== CATLEY Mailing List ====
> See our CAT(T)LEY One-Name pages at :
> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~hills/index.html
>
> ==============================
> Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the
> last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more:
http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx
>
I've been really busy sorting my whole family tree out, but have a little
bit of information to add to the CATLEY list about the branch that moved
from Nottinghamshire and ended up in Sheffield. I've received GRO
certificates for Eliza Jane CATLEY and fortunately they verify all the
information I'd found on census records, the mormon site and parish records
in Sheffield.
Best regards
Kay M
1. WILLIAM CATLEY
Born 1821 in Farndon, Nottinghamshire
Baptism: 19 Aug 1821, Farndon, Nottinghamshire
Died Btn. Jul - Sep 1865 in Southwell
Occupation: Cottager, Labourer
Married ZILPHA BELL, 16 Dec 1845 in North Muskham, Nottinghamshire by Banns,
daughter of ROBERT BELL and RUTH.
She was born 1818 in Balderton, Nottinghamshire,
Baptism: 19 Jul 1818, Balderton, Nottinghamshire
Burial: 31 Mar 1875, Burngreave Cemetery, Sheffield
Children of WILLIAM CATLEY and ZILPHA BELL are:
i. ELIZABETH4 CATLEY, Born about 1846, Fiskerton, Nottinghamshire
Baptism: 02 Aug 1846, Rolleston, Fiskerton, Nottinghamshire
ii. ELIZA JANE CATLEY,
Born. 26 Mar 1848, North Muskham, Nottinghamshire
Baptism: 06 Mar 1848, Moor house, North Muskham, Nottinghamshire
Died. 06 Jun 1901, Royal Infirmary Hospital, Sheffield
Burial: 10 Jun 1901, Burngreave Cemetery, Sheffield
Married: DENBY COGGAN, 12 Mar 1876, Christ Church, Pitsmoor, Sheffield,
iii. THOMAS CATLEY,
Born: 1849, North Muskham, Nottinghamshire
Baptism: 02 Dec 1849, Moor house, North Muskham, Nottinghamshire
Burial: 06 Sep 1883, Burngreave Cemetery, Sheffield
iv. ANN CATLEY,
Born: 1852, North Muskham, Nottinghamshire
Baptism: 02 May 1852, Moor house, North Muskham, Nottinghamshire
Married: JAMES PACEY, 26 Oct 1873, Christ Church, Pitsmoor, Sheffield