Actually Edee, there was no sarcasm intended. I just
so often see folks that assume that their version of
things is the only correct version and the tone of
your first reply to David sounded more like, 'Your
wrong and this is what's right" and, that being one of
my few pet peeves I felt compelled to attempt to
remind folks once again that many time there are
alternate versions of a history and each sometimes has
a grain of truth to it. Usually though folks tend to
be sure that their version is always the correct one
and try to force it on others without documentation.
You show now you have documentation for your claims,
David has some reference for his, now is time to
attempt to verify both sources and see if it can be
narrowed down further.
I did not mean to offend you, and rereading my post
I can see that it might, I was a bit unpolished
yesterday, that's what I get for writing from the
office before I've had my coffee.
I offer a public apology to you for my abruptness, I
could have been a bit more tactful. I was irritated
adn I am sorry.
=====
Jim Williamson
Researching: Williamson, Marth, Kinsella, Case, Pace,
Hall, Straub, Fox, and McCurdy (the last
until I can prove/disprove a link to the
Williamson line)
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/