Sorry Holly, it did not print out correctly for me! I see it on the actual
web page. Thanks
Betsy
-------Original Message-------
From: Holly Carter Dunlap Georgia
Date: 8/16/2011 5:58:27 PM
To: carter-dna(a)rootsweb.com
Subject: Re: [CARTER-DNA] William Carter of Christ Parish, Middlesex Co., VA
Larry, the answer you gave is correct. Kits are grouped by matching
Haplogroup first and then by matching Marker Numbers.
I don't understand the comment: "We are supposed to be R1b1, though it is
not shown on Carter-cousins webpage."
I see "R1b1" with Kit # GT0001 [ Nathan McCarter ]. I don't understand what
is missing.
From: larry-and-nancy(a)cox.net
To: carter-dna(a)rootsweb.com
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:53:02 -0500
Subject: Re: [CARTER-DNA] William Carter of Christ Parish, Middlesex Co.,
VA
Hello Betsy, If you look thee are quite a few R1b1's in various groups,
Seperation is because of the number of matching markers, I think. Perhaps
Holly or Keith can give you more information on this.
Many times the paper trail can get lost, destroyed or information just may
not have been passed along or recorded.
Makes Research just that more challenging and frusterating.
Larry
----- Original Message -----
From: "Betsy Wildes" <celticspirit(a)insightbb.com>
To: <carter-dna(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: [CARTER-DNA] William Carter of Christ Parish, Middlesex Co.,
VA
>
> Thank you, Larry! I have been trying to find the answer to this question
> also! I am , actually my brother is, kit # GT0001* Our earliest
PROVEN
> ancestor is Chauncy Carter. It has been said, though not proven, that
his
> father was Nathan McCarter and Polly Kent M: 1800. She was the
daughter
> of
> Charles Kent.
> We are grouped with kit 91664 with a 29/30 match. There is no matching
> paper trail!
> We are supposed to be R1b1, though it is not shown on Carter-cousins web
> page. So why are these two kits separated from the rest of the
R1b1
> groups?
>
> Betsy Carter-Wildes
>