Hi Shirley,
Elaine here again...
What I was pondering but now realize I didn't make clear in my message to
you, is that perhaps your ancestor William and my Robert were brothers? Our
family also did not show imagination in naming the children, but handed down
family names generation after generation for at least 200 years. Family
names were: William, James, Robert, Hugh, John and George, as well as
Agnes, Elizabeth, Jane, Janet, and Margaret. I mentioned that my Robert
Carson named his son John. John in turn named his oldest child after
himself, and the next male child was called William. Is there anything that
you know about the life of your people that might connect them to mine?
Elaine
Vancouver, B.C., Canada
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shirley Johnson" <shirleyjohnson(a)shaw.ca>
To: <carson(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2006 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: [CARSON] WILLIAM CARSON
Thank you, Josette, for stating this. I have enjoyed reading this
discussion.
It is so tempting to look for ways to confirm what you suspect -
especially when the searching gets frustrating. I am not involved in
the DNA research and am somewhat cautious as to its actual value. My
scepticism always leads me to wonder if the most vigorous proponents of
anything might have a financial benefit from it. Also, it is sad to see
people given information that makes them optimistic/excited about
something when it is not really accurate.
There are many of us who are finding dead ends in our Irish research -
but we keep trying - perhaps somewhere there is a tiny bit of
information that will help.
Personally, I am having some difficulty with William Carson (born abt
1787 in Fermanagh) and his wife Ann (born about 1787 in Leitrim). Many
of us here in Canada are descendents of this couple - as well as many
who are now in the U.S. And, as most of us have discovered, the Carson
families did not show much originality in naming their children.
Shirley Carson Johnson
British Columbia, Canada
-----Original Message-----
From: carson-bounces(a)rootsweb.com [mailto:carson-bounces@rootsweb.com]
On Behalf Of Josette L. Maxwell
Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2006 9:57 AM
To: carson(a)rootsweb.com
Subject: Re: [CARSON] WILLIAM CARSON
Several years ago - seven/eight? - when this Alexander Harvey Carson
"line" was set forth, a number of the Carson researchers (with decades
of experience in genealogy) managed to track down the originator of the
information - a guy in Arizona. He was repeatedly contacted and asked
for evidence/documentation/verification of the information cited by him.
He absolutely refused to do so. Further, people started trying to verify
themselves and there exists nothing that supports his whole myth in
terms of linage although there was information on specific individuals
at specific times, i.e. there was a Rev. Alexander Carson (if I remember
correctly) who was in Scotland at one time.
Genealogy data without evidence/documentation is mythology.
With reference to the DNA testing, you can independently verify via
internet research that the process they are using can only establish a
linkage going back three or four generations, if that. The other form of
DNA testing is more accurate. Since everyone in the world (according to
some archeaologistis and geneticists) go back to "Lucy", you're bound to
find some linkages. With respect to establishing genalogical proof, it
is totally worthless. It's a waste of money and basically takes your
time and money from pursuing real genealogy research.
I cannot tell you how many people write me telling me that they are part
of the Henry Maxwell/Agness Carson line (which goes
back to 1725) because of the DNA testing. We have everyone, and I mean
everyone documented, proven beyond doubt. And,
they keep writing back and saying but the DNA proves it. It
is really totally worthless.
If you look at family search data, you can see the "carsons" who are
from the nordic countries (spelled slightly differently, converted or
rather angelized to Carson). There is also an Italian line.
People always look for shortcuts to the plodding required in genealogy
research. And, sometimes you hit a dead end and it is really a dead
end. I cannot get Walter and Agness Carson or Samuel and Jane Carson
back to Scotland/Ireland nor can I get HEnry Maxwell back. I suspect
that will always be the case. The records just aren't there.
Josette
-----Original Message-----
>From: Stephanie Carson Feldman <steph_carson(a)yahoo.com>
>Sent: Oct 8, 2006 12:00 PM
>To: carson(a)rootsweb.com
>Subject: Re: [CARSON] WILLIAM CARSON
>
>Josette,
>I also have seen the Alexander Harvery Carson. Do you
>know what source records prompted this? There must be something to
>have started it, though I'm sure the internet has propagated it.
>
>Are there male Carsons of this line around today? I'd
>love to have more people participate in the DNA
>studies. They have a 67 marker test now that can
>bring the generations down to a much smaller number.
>
>Stephanie
>
>--- "Josette L. Maxwell" <maxwelljl(a)earthlink.net>
>wrote:
>> There is absolutely no evidence/documentation of any relationship
>> to the "Alexander Carson" line, if indeed it is a
>> line. It's been
>> discredited many times.
>_______________________________________________
>CARSON mailing list
>CARSON(a)rootsweb.com
>
>-------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
>CARSON-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
>quotes in the subject and the body of the message
_______________________________________________
CARSON mailing list
CARSON(a)rootsweb.com
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
CARSON-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
quotes in the subject and the body of the message
_______________________________________________
CARSON mailing list
CARSON(a)rootsweb.com
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
CARSON-request(a)rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes
in the subject and the body of the message