If he remarried at 87 and living in the pre-Viagra days, wouldn't
surprise me not to see any more new Carriers from him. :-)
I think the Virginia line is a separate line of immigration possibly
from the same source (England).
On the LDS site, England seems to have produced more than it's share of
Thomas Carriers.
Neal
Nicole wrote:
I would tend to think that they got the two Thomas'
confused.. I mean, yes, why would he have gotten
married so much later. Also ,there are no mystery
children wandering around. Also, I presume you have
seen that e-mail about the ship, with the two
Carriers. One of the passengers was a Thomas Morgan,
and the ship landed about 1654 in VA. Our Thomas'
first appearance in MA was about 1655. Is this the
same Thomas? But then again, why would he go up to MA
if he landed in VA? Who knows.. I am just curious...
===
"It is a good rule in life never to apologize. The right sort
of people don't want apologies, and the wrong sort take a mean
advantage of them." ~P.G. Wodehouse
Researching surnames: Carrier, Dey, Watrous/Waterhouse,
Ingalls, Allen, Spofford, Sessions, Brown, Cook, Cooper,Childs
Wirth, Rosenberger, Fiedler, Auchter, Karch, Schlageter,
Reuther, Kasslar, Baumann to name a few :-)
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at
http://mail.yahoo.com
--
Neal F. Carrier
Holland Patent, NY
WAGS #776
Listowner CARRIER-L Mail List