This article appeared in Dick Eastmans latest newsletter and should be of interest
to any who have Pilgirm roots or to anyone concerned with preserving our
heritage.
It shows that commercial destruction of historical sites isn't just an
"American"
problem but is worldwide.
===========================================================
- Leiden, Holland, Pilgrim Sites Threatened
Two years ago I had the pleasure of visiting Leiden, Netherlands.
I walked in the neighborhood where the Pilgrims lived prior to
their trip to Plymouth, Massachusetts. I also toured the Leiden
American Pilgrim Museum. Even though I do not have Pilgrim
ancestry, I felt a strong sense of connection to an important
piece of American history.
This week I was distressed to read the following warning from
Jeremy Dupertuis Bangs, Director of the Leiden American Pilgrim
Museum. Much of this historical area may soon be destroyed. I
would suggest that every reader of this newsletter write a letter
or e-mail to each party listed. Also, please distribute this
information onto newslists, forums, chat boards and genealogy
society newsletters as you see fit:
NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN PILGRIM SITES DEMOLITION PLANS: LEIDEN'S
VROUWEKERK AND AALMARKT SITES
Jeremy Dupertuis Bangs, Director, Leiden American Pilgrim
Museum,
19 September 2000
November 7, 2000, has been set for the Council of State's
hearing on the City of Leiden's intention to demolition the
remains of the Vrouwekerk, the medieval church that was used
by the Walloons (Huguenots) after the Reformation. Through its
association with the families of Philip Delano, Francis Cooke
and his wife Hester Mayhew, Edward Bumpas and other Huguenots
who became Pilgrims, this site symbolizes the confluence of
two major streams in the history of persecution, refuge,
religious freedom, and colonial migration - the English
Separatists now called the Pilgrims and the French Calvinists
known as the Huguenots. In addition to the Pilgrim
connections, this is the church from which numerous families
emigrated to New York and Guyana in 1622-24, led by Jesse de
Forest. Thus the site is important for its historical
associations with the beginnings of colonial settlement in
both New York and New Netherlands.
In a new development, the Council of State has informed the
parties in the case that they may submit new evidence and
supporting materials up to two weeks before the date of the
hearing. Thus it becomes possible for me to submit individual
letters expressing support for my contention that the cultural
and historical value of the Vrouwekerk ruin as an important
symbol of the ties between The Netherlands and America
justifies a decision to prevent demolition. I can also now
include a copy of the petition which many people have signed,
as evidence in this case. This new development is very
encouraging and inspires hopes that the Council of State will
recognize the value of preserving this ruin to commemorate an
important link in the common histories of The Netherlands,
Belgium, France, and America.
Please send letters of support for preserving the Vrouwekerk
to me before October 15. I will then submit them to the
Council of State.
My postal address is:
Mandenmakerssteeg 11,
2311 ED Leiden
The Netherlands
My (new) e-mail address is:
bangsflynn(a)cs.com
Thank you very much for your continued support in this effort.
[Dispute details in the following sub-article:]
AALMARKT DEVELOPMENTS
Following discussions and decisions on the town's plans to
regulate prostitution (only four brothels), which the central
government has decriminalized as of October 1st, Leiden's Town
Council debated the Aalmarkt demolition plans in its meeting
last Tuesday, September 12, 2000. Despite eloquently expressed
opposition to large-scale construction and to demolition of
the historic sites in the Aalmarkt area, the coalition led by
the Labor Party (PvdA), circumvented attempts by the
opposition parties to require preservation of historic
monuments as well as to require competitive bidding and plan
proposals, thus retaining complete control of the development
within the cabinet of the mayor and aldermen. After several
months of further work on the drawing boards, that group
intends to present a choice to the council of two development
alternatives, both of which presuppose large-scale demolition
to accomplish the amount of new floor-space for large stores
that private investors want to build where numerous sixteenth
and seventeenth-century houses and other historic monuments
now stand. The cabinet of the mayor and alderman have
expressed their entire confidence in the ability of the single
private development company they have chosen (without
competitive bidding) to achieve plans which will represent the
best way to accomplish a profitable future for the city's
selected investors and to provide employment to local
contractors who traditionally support the Labor Party. The
damaging effects on existing small businesses and the traffic
chaos that can be foreseen are very sensitive to the fact that
one of the major investors, AHOLD, has discovered that its
American shoppers are unhappy that their money is going to a
company that intends to participate in the destruction of an
aspect of [history] are topics that were postponed by
promising future clarification.
Recent architectural surveys of the buildings prove that the
hospital wing where Myles Standish recuperated from wounds is
practically intact, with enough of its timber roof from 1571
still there to make complete restoration a real possibility.
The cabinet, however, has explicitly retained the "right" to
determine that such monuments will be demolished if it is
otherwise impossible to achieve the financial goals of the
property developer and the investors.
In a public debate (Sept. 5) and at an open meeting of the
town council's Commission on Urban Planning (Sept. 7),
numerous groups hoping to improve the city through preserving
its cultural and historic fabric echoed the pleas of the
(essentially powerless) National Monument Service and spoke in
favor of development without demolition. These groups included
the Aalmarkt Foundation, The Leiden Cultural Platform, The
Leiden Antiquarian Association "Oud Leiden", The Heritage
Preservation Society "Heemschut", The Arent van 's-Gravezande
Foundation for Architectural Heritage Preservation, and The
Leiden American Pilgrim Museum. The public response is
overwhelmingly in favor of preservation, and several speakers
specifically pointed out the need to preserve places that
serve to commemorate the city's role in the Pilgrim story, in
addition to the widespread general concern that a few
politicians and their friends, making decisions behind closed
doors, are destroying irrevocably the city these citizens
love.
AHOLD is the Dutch holding company that owns STOP & SHOP,
Giant-Landover, Giant-Carlisle, Tops Markets, BI-LO, and
Pathmark Stores.
Your letter to AHOLD will help in the preservation effort.
Write to:
Royal Ahold
P.O.Box 3050
1500 HB Zaandem,
The Netherlands
e-mail: corp.communications(a)corp.ahold.nl
Another company interested in investing in this demolition is
the Fortis Financial Group. They are included among the
addresses to which all reports from the developer are sent.
You may want to contact their American offices, also.
Write to:
Fortis Investors Inc.
P.O.Box 64284
St. Paul, MN 55164
or contact them at e-mail: financial(a)us.fortis.com
It is impossible to predict the outcome of this conflict
between the interests of those with hopes for a future
grounded in the reminders of a proud heritage and the
interests of those searching to maximize profits in the short
term. Your letters will count, now.
Thank you,
Jeremy Dupertuis Bangs
==========================================================