Right. If you are going to use one, I would stick to the lineages that are
currently approved by the Order of the Crown of Charlemagne society. These
have been published in book form (currently three volumes, I think). They
update them as new information becomes available. Another widely accepted
book is Royalty for Commoners by Stuart. I, too, have seen these lineages
that claim to go back to THE Adam, and while they are good for giggles I
wouldn't bet the farm on them.
Lynda Moreau
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff L Carr" <ffejlny(a)juno.com>
To: <CARR-L(a)rootsweb.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 10:16 PM
Subject: Re: [CARR] Re: William the Conqueror
The problem with WtC is also that so many of the charts beyond him
are
very suspect. I have seen three and all of them different. They also do
not seem to have ALL the generations accounted for.
Jeff Carr of TX
==== CARR Mailing List ====
CARR Surname Research Center
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~twigs/CARR/