You have called my attention to an egregious error I made.
I said that the following points with which I strongly disagreed were your
arguments -- they were not your statements.
The erroneous text follows:
On Sat, 29 May 1999, Patricia Tidmarsh wrote:> > Sir-->
I disagree profoundly with two of your basic arguments.>
1. - Historical material should not be posted unless it is
absolutely correct.>
2. - The definition of personal privacy and copyrights.>
You have a perfect and proper right to have a differing opinions, to
state
them and to defend them, as you have for the past year and
specifically within the past week.> > Most sincerely,>
Patricia Carman Tidmarsh> > > > > > > > >
Dan, I retract my statement, you did not make these arguments.
Most sincerly
Patricia Carman Tidmarsh