Beginning March 2nd, 2020 the Mailing Lists functionality on RootsWeb will be discontinued. Users will no longer be able to send outgoing emails or accept incoming emails. Additionally, administration tools will no longer be available to list administrators and mailing lists will be put into an archival state.
Administrators may save the emails in their list prior to March 2nd. After that, mailing list archives will remain available and searchable on RootsWeb
Samuel B. Carmack was abt 26 years old, 20 but under 30, on the 1840
Census......
I am still looking for his parents........have cause to believe that
he was dropped by the stork while enroute to his Mama......and maybe he was
raised by ??????
Just kidding, of course............he is definitely a brick wall for
the many descendants of his that are actively looking for a connection for
him...........
Samuel B., wife & children are in Coffee County, TN, in 1850,
Hardeman County, TN, 1860, Gibson County, 1870........My g grandfather,
William Franklin, son of Samuel B. is found on the Crockett County, TN Census
in 1880 & in Lauderdale County, TN by 1900 Census........3 of William
Franklin's siblings have moved to AR by the 1880 Census.....one to AL......
If any of you find parents who lost a Samuel B. Carmack, please get
in touch with me. :o)
Thanks!
Marsha Owen
Tupelo, MS
I just realized that I haven't received any Carmack List mail since May 6th,
have I somehow been removed or are we quiet for the moment?
Thanks, Jo Anne Holmes
--WebTV-Mail-18461-446
Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Hi Judy,
I believe that the Mary Carmack in your message very well could be the
Mary Cookson who married Cornelius Carmack, son of John Carmack.
According to a copy of a record that I have, their first child,
Elizabeth was born 6 Oct. 1773, and I believe this was just before they
moved to VA. with his father John Carmack. It says their next child was
John born 17 Aug. 1775 (which is beside the point, but it continues to
list their children).
This is not much help on your question, but it shows it is possibly that
Mary. I received this copy from Erma Carmack. It is a "Carmack family
record found in an old book bought in East Tennessee by Mr. Hooberry and
presented to the archives Aug. 12, 1927." I presume that means the
Tenn. State Archives. There seems to be an error in the marriage date
given for Cornelius Carmack and Mary Cookson because it says they were
married on 8th day of October 1778. That probably is a typographical
error because their 3rd child Rachel was born 6 July 1777, then Susannah
4th child, born 5 June 1779.
Another clue is that it says Mary Cookson was the daughter of Samuel and
Jane Cookson. They may have been witnesses at her brother's marriage
if he was named Samuel for his father. As for being a Quaker, I have no
information.
Betty
--WebTV-Mail-18461-446
Content-Disposition: Inline
Content-Type: Message/RFC822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Received: from smtpin-102-8.bryant.webtv.net (209.240.198.45) by
storefull-102.iap.bryant.webtv.net with WTV-SMTP; Sat, 5 May 2001
07:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by smtpin-102-8.bryant.webtv.net (WebTV_Postfix+sws) id B6472166;
Sat, 5 May 2001 07:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: densmom(a)webtv.net
Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.123]) by
smtpin-102-8.bryant.webtv.net (WebTV_Postfix+sws) with ESMTP id
113BB10F; Sat, 5 May 2001 07:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id
f45E2vq08715; Sat, 5 May 2001 07:02:57 -0700
Resent-Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 07:02:57 -0700
X-Original-Sender: judyschool(a)msn.com Sat May 5 07:02:56 2001
X-Originating-IP: [63.46.120.19]
From: "Judy French" <judyschool(a)msn.com>
Old-To: <CARMACK-L(a)rootsweb.com>
Subject: Cornelius Carmack-Quaker Records of Northern Maryland
Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 08:51:01 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MSN Explorer 6.00.0010.0912
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Message-ID: <OE149VyRYg14sKuCYZv0000a9ac(a)hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 May 2001 14:02:53.0151 (UTC)
FILETIME=[13C92EF0:01C0D56C]
Resent-Message-ID: <6Bvj1D.A.-HC.QgA96(a)lists5.rootsweb.com>
To: CARMACK-L(a)rootsweb.com
Resent-From: CARMACK-L(a)rootsweb.com
Reply-To: CARMACK-L(a)rootsweb.com
X-Mailing-List: <CARMACK-L(a)rootsweb.com> archive/latest/991
X-Loop: CARMACK-L(a)rootsweb.com
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: CARMACK-L-request(a)rootsweb.com
I was at the library a couple of days ago, just pulling books out of the Maryland section, checking the index, and found this:
"Marriages: Samuel Cookson, Westminster Town, Frederick Co., MD and Mary Haines of Pipe Creek, 20th day of 1st month, 1773 at Pipe Creek Meeting House. Witnesses:----Mary Carmack -----Cornelius Carmack---"
Is the above mentioned Mary Carmack the Mary Cookson Carmack who married Cornelius Carmack, son of John? If so, was she a Quaker?
I didn't copy all the names of the witnesses; however, if anyone is interested I can copy them the next time I go to the library.
Judy Carmack French<br clear=all><hr>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a href="http://explorer.msn.com">http://explorer.msn.com</a><br></p>
==== CARMACK Mailing List ====
I'm not stuck, I'm ancestrally challenged.
--WebTV-Mail-18461-446--
I was at the library a couple of days ago, just pulling books out of the Maryland section, checking the index, and found this:
"Marriages: Samuel Cookson, Westminster Town, Frederick Co., MD and Mary Haines of Pipe Creek, 20th day of 1st month, 1773 at Pipe Creek Meeting House. Witnesses:----Mary Carmack -----Cornelius Carmack---"
Is the above mentioned Mary Carmack the Mary Cookson Carmack who married Cornelius Carmack, son of John? If so, was she a Quaker?
I didn't copy all the names of the witnesses; however, if anyone is interested I can copy them the next time I go to the library.
Judy Carmack French<br clear=all><hr>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a href="http://explorer.msn.com">http://explorer.msn.com</a><br></p>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C0D532.5AC33EC0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > > > > > > The Madam opened the brothel door to see a frail, elderly
> gentleman.
> > > > > > > "Can I help you?" the madam asked.
> > > > > > > "I want Natalie," the old man replied.
> > > > > > > "Sir, Natalie is one of our most expensive ladies, perhaps
> someone
> > > > > > > else...""No, I must see Natalie."
> > > > > > > Just then Natalie appeared and announced to the old man that
> she charged
> > > > > > > $1,000 per visit. Without blinking, the man reached into his
> pocket
> > > > > > >and handed her ten $100 bills. The two went up to a room for an
> hour,
> > > > > > >where upon the man calmly left.
> > > > > > > The next night he appeared again demanding to see Natalie.
> > > > > > > Natalie explained that no one had ever come back two nights in
> a row
> > > > > > >and that there were no discounts...it was still $1,000 a visit.
> Again the
> > > > > > >old man took out the money, the two went up to the room and an
> hour later,
> > > > > > >he left.
> > > > > > >When he showed up the third consecutive night, no one could
> believe it.
> > > > > > >Again he handed Natalie the money and up to the room they went.
> At
> > > > > > >the end of the hour Natalie questioned the old man: "No one has
> ever used my
> > > > > > >services three nights in a row.
> > > > > > >