Beginning March 2nd, 2020 the Mailing Lists functionality on RootsWeb will be discontinued. Users will no longer be able to send outgoing emails or accept incoming emails. Additionally, administration tools will no longer be available to list administrators and mailing lists will be put into an archival state.
Administrators may save the emails in their list prior to March 2nd. After that, mailing list archives will remain available and searchable on RootsWeb
Anyone know anything about these Cardens/Morelocks being black?
Subject:
Morelock
Date:
Tue, 9 May 2000 20:27:55 EDT
From:
JPOORE18822(a)gateway.net
To:
bmacd(a)dmci.net
Hi I just came across your family page and have been searching for info
on
the Molock family for ever it seems , I was trying every name but
Morelock.
My husband's grandfather was James Robert and his dad was Robert Larkin.
Was
wondering if you know the orgin of this family, we have been told Irish
and
Dutch. I had just received some of the info on Robert Larkin from
another
Molock and he is sending me the info he has on William C.
I did notice that on one of these pages it listed a census and said
something like Robert Larkin m black farm, then his wife, f black
ho;usekeeper, then James m black farm, im so new at this does that mean
they
were black or does that mean they worked on a black farm?
hope to hear from you
Jackie Poore
A minor piece of 'Carden' info below that may be useful to someone.
Regards,
Dave Collins
dave.clnz(a)xtra.co.nz
ph (09) 298 6614
-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Mountain & Deborah Carmichael [mailto:gaddes@bigpond.com]
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2000 7:38 PM
To: 'Dave Collins'
Subject: RE: Somerset Men in Monmouth Rebellion 1685
Hi dave,
Sorry its taken so long to get back to you !
One entry for CARDEN as follows :
CARDEN Thomas : tried at Wells; transported for Howard Oct 25 to Jamacia
There are no entries for COLLINS from Rode, but there are 3 men from
Chardland. Let me know if you want the details.
No entries for DANVERS, BROOKS, FUSSELL, NOAD, MINCHIN WHEELER or WHITTAKER
Best wishes, Deborah
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Collins [SMTP:dave.clnz@xtra.co.nz]
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 8:52 AM
To: Gary Mountain & Deborah Carmichael
Subject: RE: Somerset Men in Monmouth Rebellion 1685
Hello Deborah. Thanks for your very kind offer.
I am not that far back with my family yet although I have one solid link
back to the 1400s. I have the following names in my tree, predominantly
from the Rode area. My own name comes from a James Collins from Hemington
in the 1700s - I have no record of him prior to that yet.
My name interests are: COLLINS, NOAD, CARDEN, WHITAKER, MINCHIN, DANVERS,
WHEELER, BROOKS, FUSSELL.
Any information on any of them would be most welcome.
Thank you very much for your efforts - much appreciated.
Regards,
Dave Collins
dave.clnz(a)xtra.co.nz
ph (09) 298 6614
-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Mountain & Deborah Carmichael [mailto:gaddes@bigpond.com]
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2000 4:00 PM
To: Bristol_and_Somerset-L(a)rootsweb.com
Subject: Somerset Men in Monmouth Rebellion 1685
The following might be of interest to list members.
Chuck
The NARA proposal to revamp the system and fees for providing copies of
Military Service Records, Bounty-Land Warrant Applications Files, and
Pension Application Files has been published in the 25 April 2000 issue of
the Federal Register. Public comment is invited and should be directed to
NARA Regulation Comment Desk
8601 Adelphi Road
College Park, MD 20740-6001
Fax: 301 713-7270
The comment period closes on 26 June 2000. NARA prefers that you use either
the postal address or fax number to submit our comments rather than e-mail.
A complete copy of the Federal Register notice is available from the NARA
Web site at http://www.nara.gov/nara/fees-pro.html. The proposed
Reproduction Fee Schedule covers a number of items, but the Military Service
Records, and the Pension and Bounty-Land Warrants are of the greatest
concern to genealogists. NARA proposes three major changes:
1. The NATF Form 80 would be discontinued, to be replaced by two new forms:
NATF Form 85 to request both Bounty-Land Warrant application files and
Pension files (more than 75 years old), and NATF From 86 to request Military
Service Records (more than 75 years old).
2. For all three types of files, NARA would no longer send a selection of
pages, but would send the complete file. This would eliminate the two-step
process currently used and should be beneficial to most genealogists.
3. The fees for all three types of files would be raised. For Military
Service Records the new fee would be $17.00, regardless of the number of
pages included in the file. For Bounty-land Warrants the fee would be
$17.25, again without regard to the number of pages. For Pension Files the
fee would be $40.00, regardless of the number of pages.
Finally, the proposal would go into effect on 1 September 2000, if approved.
Many genealogists may consider the proposed fees to be excessive. NARA
specifically invites comment on the proposed fee schedule. The FGS/NGS
Records Preservation and Access Committee urges everyone who wants to
comment to carefully read the full proposal before submitting comments. The
proposed fees are intended to cover the actual cost of locating, copying and
mailing the records, plus 10% as authorized by law, and are based on the
average size of the files. NARA states that the average for Military Service
Records and Bounty-land Applications is somewhere under 20 pages, while the
average for full Pension Files is 105 pages.
The FGS/NGS Records Preservation and Access Committee will be looking at the
NARA proposal carefully, and will submit comments as appropriate.
Individuals who would like to provide input to the Committee's evaluation
are welcome to do so but are also encouraged to comment direct to NARA at
the address given above. Comments for Committee consideration should be
e-mailed to fgs-access(a)fgs.org, or mailed to Federation of Genealogical
Societies, Attention: RPAC, PO Box 200940, Austin, TX 78720-0940. In order
for the Records Preservation and Access Committee to adequately evaluate
such input it must be received by 26 May 2000. The deadline for comment to
NARA, however, is still 26 June 2000.
Posting of this message to other mail lists is encouraged. A copy of
this message will also be available on the Records Preservation and
Access page of the FGS Web site http://www.fgs.org/fgs-recordsnews.htm>
and on the NGS Web site <http://www.ngsgenealogy.org>