Thanks CUZ, Good Bad Or indiferent, Itn njust Seemed With this much
Information that somer one would have noticesd, I known that I have alot of
time, But , No,m interest, i sure hope that there is some time Available for
some Attention to <BOSS JOSH> Campbell's <C. S. A.> IRON CROSS Cermony.
do not want to Sound like An bother, But the Planer Would like to have
someIdea as to how Masny People will be there. It is 3:00 PM Sunday May 6,
2012. TRUE any one is Free to make up their MIND, & there are some that
may not decide untill That Sunday Morning, If so Please come on. this is not
invitation only it is for Any one who wishes to see a great Cermony. Just
be there IF YOU can. Hope to see many of OUR Cousins in Lowesville, Va on
SUNDAY May 6/2012 With the Reenactors & The Southern BELLES With their
HOOP-SKIRTS. hopeing for Many Cousins.
CUZ AT _atpowelljr(a)aol.com_ (mailto:email@example.com)
In a message dated 2/10/2012 8:59:32 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
I looked at this and sorry that I didn't reply sooner. I have exchanged
information with Wayne and he does a great job and we've worked together on
our Campbell family. But we do differ on the children of Francis Campbell
and Nancy Coffey. I have never found anything to support children named
Joseph or Rachel. ( believe that Joseph C. and Rachel were children of brother
Based on census records, marriage records, etc. it appears that Francis
and Nancy Campbell had 7 children, 2 boys and 5 girls. They have been
identified as: Francis Jefferson, Edmund J., Mary "Polly", Elizabeth, Nancy,
Malinda and Manerva. It should also be noted that Francis made a deed of trust
(I think in 1834 or so) for the support and maintenance of his family which
identified his wife and children.
If anyone has anything to confirm that Francis and Nancy had children
named Joseph and Rachel I'd sure be interested.
PS: I don't believe anyone has anything to support Isabell's last name
being Catlett. It might be but nothing to confirm that yet.
I've have correspondence with Catlett researchers over the years and have
found not one of them that claims this theory.
_Reply to sender_
ENTION%20in%205%20DAYS) | _Reply to group_
has%20not%20atracted%20ANY%20ATTENTION%20in%205%20DAYS) | _Reply via web
| _Start a New Topic_
_Messages in this topic_
* _New Photos_
_Visit Your Group_
Switch to: _Text-Only_
(mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=Change Delivery Format:
Traditional) , _Daily Digest_
(mailto:email@example.com?subject=Email Delivery: Digest) •