W-E-L-L, C-U-Z-, YOU HAVE NEVER AGREED WITH ANYTHIING THAT ANY OF THEM<OUR
CUSINS INCLUDED POSTED IN THE HERITAGE BOOKS, THOUGH MANY OF THOSE
ARTICALS STATE THE LEGITEMENT SOURSES,
I AM GOING TO SHOW YOU & THE OTHER AUTHENCY FREAKS WHERE YOU CAN BE ALL
WRONG.
OUR OLD GEORGE & GRANNY CATTY ,UNK. HAD 13 CHILDREN; i VENTUER TO SAY
THAT THERE IS WAY MORE MEMBERSS OF CAMPBELL_KIDS FROM JOHN & WILLIAM
CAMPBELL THAN FROM ALL OF THE OTHER CHILDREN OF GEORGE & GRANNY CATTY
i DOUBT IF ONE OF MY 4TH GREAT GRAND FATHER GEORGE CAMPBELL'S CHILDREN
WAS TTO SEE THE LIST OF THE CAMPBELL_KIDS IF THEY WOULD HAVE ANY IDEA
AS TOO WHO HE WAS IN THE PRESENCE OF; BOTH SHIRLEY CRAFT & MINE, WITH ALL
THREE OF US PROVEN TRUE DESCENDANTS OF OLE GEORGE & GRANNY CATTY, THE
RESULTS WOULD LEAVE YOU OR ANY OTHER CAMPBELLKIDS RESEARCHER IN A
BL_________________K WITH EVERY THING THAT A THREE OF OLE EORGES DESCENDANTS WOULD BE
TRUE TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE, AND THAT MY CONFUSED COUSN IS WHY PEOPLE
HAVE TROUBLE WITH THE HERITAGE BOOKS, THE PEOPLE WHO READ THE HERITAGE
BOOKSTORY & HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT ARE IN REALITY, IN TWO DIFFERENT WORLDS BUT
WITH THE SAME STORY.
ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT PARTS OF OUR REASEARCH IS TO GWT AS MANY PARTS
OF OUR FAMILY TO GRARTHER, BUT PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THERE IS NO PLACE IN
GENEALOGY FOR THESE <4 WORDS, IT JUST CAINT BE!
COUSINS, WITH ONE ADOPTON & OR AN OUT OF WEDLOCK BIRTH <UNKNOWN OF, WILL
NUTREALIZE D. N. A. RESULTS.
MANY OF THE NOT BELIEVED HERITAGE BOOK ARTICALS HAVE JUST AS GOOD SOURCES
AS AY RESEARCHER
ONE VERY IMPORTANT POINT IN FAMIY RESEARCHL IT IS JUST A MANY IF NOT
MORE BLUNDERS MADE BY THOOSE WHO DO NOT BELIEVE ANY OF WHAT THEY READ AS
THERE IS FROM THOSEE WHO DO NOT BELIEVE ANYTHING THHAT WE READ, huh, TO NOT
BELIEVE THAT WOULD KILL OUR RESON FOR SEEKING RECORDS. NO MATER HOW GOOD OF A
REASEARCHER WE MIGHT BE, JUST BECAUSE WE HAVE NEVER SEEN SOMETHING DOES NOT
MAKE ANYTHING TRUE OR FALSE.
I VENTUER TO SAY THAT CAMPBELL_KIDS HAVE AS GOOD IF NOT MORE & BETER
FAMILY INFORMATION ABOUT OLE GEORGE & GRANNY KATTY UNK &ACRDING THE POSTED
FAMILY INFORMATION THAN ANY OF OUR COUNTERPARTS.
IN MY OPINION IT SURE BE INTRESTING TO SEE IF ANY OF THE OTHER
DESCENDANTS HAVE ANY CAMPBELL FAMILY INFORMATION ASSEMBLED????
what ever any of our ole George & Granny Cattys Ddescendnts might have,
sure be interested to see. NOW, just disagreeing with CUZ AT, is not the
answer. Just letts see if you can come forth with , the counter to CUZ AT
YEP, much of this is true, & alot will be questioned, so an opinion will
have no effect AS TO WHEATHER IT IS TRUE OR FALSE
I AM tired of opinionated lynchings.
I HAVE MANY WELL VERSED KIN FOLKS
BUT I VENTURE TO SAY THAT I DO NOT HAVE A FAMILY CONNECTION WHO WAS IN 43
OF HA U. S. STATED BY THE Firrst of SEPT 1,1950 there is no doubt but you
had just as much informtion from your area as i did from mine, Whichis to
say the people who submited their artical in he HERITAGE BOOK could have
been just as correct from their knowledge of liveing in their time as CUZ BH,
learned from his research, JUST BECAUSE IT MAY SONT A BIT DIFFERENT<
QUESTION HAVE YOU EVER LOST A SON<I HAVE: COUSINS, YA should see the resukts of
the distortations plantd by the GRAND MOTHER, i am not saayingthat she
intended it that way BUT I AM Haveing experences that could have not been if
things had just not been said, CUZ AT
In a message dated 11/16/2013 2:12:21 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
bharris1932(a)comcast.net writes:
I have never said that these people were wrong? BH
From: _Atpowelljr(a)aol.com_ (mailto:Atpowelljr@aol.com)
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2013 1:36 PM
To: _bharris1932(a)comcast.net_ (mailto:bharris1932@comcast.net)
Subject: (no subject)
This thread:
* WHAT ARE YU BASEING YOUR CONECTION THAT ALL OF THESE PEOPLE ARE
WRONG ON??? CUZ AT
* * * _ATTENNL CAMPBELL-- ENNIS FAMILY MARRIAGES_
(
http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/CAMPBELL/2005-03/1109990185) by
_Atpowelljr(a)aol.com_ (mailto:Atpowelljr@aol.com)
* _Reply: Campbell and Ennis marriages_
(
http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/CAMPBELL/2005-03/1110002746) by
"Lilly" <
_malik(a)scs-net.org_ (mailto:malik@scs-net.org) >
* _Re: [CAMPBELL] Reply: Campbell and Ennis marriages_
(
http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/CAMPBELL/2005-03/1110153329) by <
_scraft(a)cfw.com_ (mailto:scraft@cfw.com) >
* _Reply: Henry Campbell born in Scotland???_
(
http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/CAMPBELL/2005-03/1110179361) by
"Lilly" <
_malik(a)scs-net.org_ (mailto:malik@scs-net.org) >
* _Re: [CAMPBELL] Reply: Henry Campbell born in Scotland???_
(
http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/CAMPBELL/2005-03/1110248671) by
Samuel Campbell < _sgt_sam_wash_co(a)yahoo.com_
(mailto:sgt_sam_wash_co@yahoo.com) >
* _RE: [CAMPBELL] Reply: Campbell and Ennis marriages_
(
http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/CAMPBELL/2005-03/1110028017) by
"Moore" <
_w_moore(a)bellsouth.net_ (mailto:w_moore@bellsouth.net) >
* _Re: [CAMPBELL] Reply: Campbell and Ennis marriages_
(
http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/CAMPBELL/2005-03/1110176179) by
_Atpowelljr(a)aol.com_ (mailto:Atpowelljr@aol.com)
____________________________________
RootsWeb is funded and supported