Hi Marylin. Not sure if you remember me but I did speak to you on the phone as well a
while back. I forgot to let you know that I did the DNA kit from Sorenson about 4 or 5
months ago. I can't wait to see the results. I have been very busy and have had to put
the genealogy stuff on hold for now.
--- On Mon, 8/31/09, gneolog(a)aol.com <gneolog(a)aol.com> wrote:
From: gneolog(a)aol.com <gneolog(a)aol.com>
Subject: [CALLISON] DNA results
To: callison(a)rootsweb.com
Date: Monday, August 31, 2009, 10:53 PM
Hi all, we just got back from a little R and R in Georgia and the DNA results from the
line from James who married Isabel Jones are back. I thought that Suzanne and I had
ordered 67 markers but had only done 37. We can always upgrade later BUT this line from
James, presumed son of William, matches 37/37 with line of Joseph, known son of William so
this fact combined with the fact that James was in Washington Co., OH with William and
also in Gallia Co. with William pretty much confirms that he was the son of William. The
matches are not posted online -- but I have all of the results in my own files. On the 37
markers -- the line from Joseph, son of William; Arthur, line of John Sr;. Hiram and now
James, son of William all match 37/37 while my line of Charles, line of John Sr. is 36/37.
Additionally, one line from the thrice married James, is 36/37 and a line from Absolem
tested on Sorenson so only tested 33 of the 37 markers BUT they all matched exactly.
As mentioned in earli!
er emails, The three lines from Moses all have the same reversed numbers on two of the
markers. Does not help confirm the father of Moses but links them all as lines from Moses.
More lines from Moses would be helpful to confirm this mutation that possibly happened
with Moses. In two of the three lines from Moses, these are the ONLY differences from the
majority on 37 markers. Two lines from two other sons of the thrice married James Callison
also have matches of 35/37. The two lines with greater differences than 35/37 are one line
from Moses but he has the reversed numbers of the other two lines from Moses so fits well
and then Joyce's Samuel -- who has no place to roost yet. <sad> Even though we
can't tell if William or John is the parent of Hiram, Moses, Absolom, we can tell that
there is a close relationship between them and the sons of the thrice married James.
Four lines have been tested to 67 markers -- Joseph, son of William; Hiram; Arthur and
Charles, lines of John Sr.
At the end of 67 markers,
Joseph, line of William and Arthur, line of John Sr (brother to William) still match
67/67
Hiram, son of ?, matches 66/67
Charles, line of John Sr matches 66/67
Hiram and Charles have mutations on different numbers.
Again, more people tested and more people upgrading to 67 would tell us more and more but
hey -- we are doing GREAT with as many people as we have.
I have a a document about 5 pages long with DNA results and my discussion of same (very
unscientific) if anyone wants a copy. It's kinda fun to compare your own results. Take
care. Marilyn
==== CALLISON Mailing List ====
CALLISON(a)rootsweb.com
To contact the List Administrator:
Rick Berkheiser, CALLISON-admin(a)rootsweb.com
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to CALLISON-request(a)rootsweb.com with
the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the
message
Hi all, we just got back from a little R and R in Georgia and the DNA results from the
line from James who married Isabel Jones are back. I thought that Suzanne and I had
ordered 67 markers but had only done 37. We can always upgrade later BUT this line from
James, presumed son of William, matches 37/37 with line of Joseph, known son of William so
this fact combined with the fact that James was in Washington Co., OH with William and
also in Gallia Co. with William pretty much confirms that he was the son of William. The
matches are not posted online -- but I have all of the results in my own files. On the 37
markers -- the line from Joseph, son of William; Arthur, line of John Sr;. Hiram and now
James, son of William all match 37/37 while my line of Charles, line of John Sr. is 36/37.
Additionally, one line from the thrice married James, is 36/37 and a line from Absolem
tested on Sorenson so only tested 33 of the 37 markers BUT they all matched exactly. As
mentioned in earli!
er emails, The three lines from Moses all have the same reversed numbers on two of the
markers. Does not help confirm the father of Moses but links them all as lines from Moses.
More lines from Moses would be helpful to confirm this mutation that possibly happened
with Moses. In two of the three lines from Moses, these are the ONLY differences from the
majority on 37 markers. Two lines from two other sons of the thrice married James Callison
also have matches of 35/37. The two lines with greater differences than 35/37 are one line
from Moses but he has the reversed numbers of the other two lines from Moses so fits well
and then Joyce's Samuel -- who has no place to roost yet. <sad> Even though we
can't tell if William or John is the parent of Hiram, Moses, Absolom, we can tell that
there is a close relationship between them and the sons of the thrice married James.
Four lines have been tested to 67 markers -- Joseph, son of William; Hiram; Arthur and
Charles, lines of John Sr.
At the end of 67 markers,
Joseph, line of William and Arthur, line of John Sr (brother to William) still match
67/67
Hiram, son of ?, matches 66/67
Charles, line of John Sr matches 66/67
Hiram and Charles have mutations on different numbers.
Again, more people tested and more people upgrading to 67 would tell us more and more but
hey -- we are doing GREAT with as many people as we have.
I have a a document about 5 pages long with DNA results and my discussion of same (very
unscientific) if anyone wants a copy. It's kinda fun to compare your own results. Take
care. Marilyn